Article V convention; term limits
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SCR 1005 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SCR 1005.
You're tracking SCR 1005
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SCR 1005 — Article V convention; term limits
Last action — house second reading
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
Died in session
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
30 added · 51 removedPlain-language change summary
The proposed amendments to SCR 1005 adjust the language of the Arizona Constitution to clarify that both the state and municipal corporations can engage in industrial activities, provided these pursuits serve a public purpose. This change emphasizes the role of local governments in contributing to economic development while ensuring that such activities align with public interests. By replacing the broader language with specific provisions, the amendment aims to give municipalities more flexibility in their economic engagements, which could impact local job creation and services.
SCR1005 - 532R - IS Ver REFERENCESenate TITLE:Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Arizona;
Articleamending Varticle convention;II, section 34, Constitution of Arizona;
termamending limitsarticle XIII, section 5, StateConstitution of ArizonaArizona; Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session SCR 1005 Introduced by Senators Petersen:
Allenrelating S, Barto, Bowie, Burges, Contreras, Dalessandro, Fann, Kavanagh, Kerr, Peshlakai, Smith, Worsley A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION applying to themunicipal congresscorporations. of the united states to call a convention for proposing an amendment to the constitution of the united states to set term limits for United States representatives and united States senators.
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) Whereas,1. Article theII, founderssection of34, the Constitution of theArizona, Unitedis Statesproposed empoweredto statebe legislatorsamended toas befollows guardiansif ofapproved libertyby againstthe futurevoters abusesand ofon powerproclamation byof the federalGovernor: government;
andSTART_STATUTE34. Industrial Whereas,pursuits itby isstate theand solemnmunicipal dutycorporations ofSection the34. The statesTHIS tostate protect the liberty of ourArizona people, particularly for the generations to come, and toeach proposemunicipal amendmentscorporation towithin the ConstitutionTHIS state of theArizona Unitedshall Stateshave through a convention of the statesright under Article V to placeengage clearin restraintsindustrial onpursuits theseTHAT andSERVE relatedA abusesPUBLIC ofPURPOSE. power.
ThereforeEND_STATUTE Be2. Article itXIII, resolvedsection by5, theConstitution Senate of theArizona, Stateis ofproposed Arizona,to be amended as follows if approved by the Housevoters and on proclamation of Representativesthe concurring:Governor:
1. That,START_STATUTE5. Right pursuant to Article V of themunicipal Constitutioncorporation of the United States, the Legislature of the State of Arizona formally applies to theengage Congressin ofbusiness theor Unitedenterprise StatesSection to5. except callas aprovided conventionin ofarticle theii, statessection limited34, toevery proposingmunicipal ancorporation amendmentwithin tothis thestate Constitutionshall ofhave the Unitedright States to setengage ain limitany onbusiness theor numberenterprise ofwhich terms that a person may be electedengaged asin by a Memberperson, offirm, theor Unitedcorporation Statesby Housevirtue of Representatives and to set a limitfranchise onfrom thesaid numbermunicipal ofcorporation. terms that a person may be elected as a Member of the United States Senate.
2. ThatEND_STATUTE this3. The applicationSecretary constitutesof aState continuingshall applicationsubmit inthis accordanceproposition withto Article V of the Constitutionvoters ofat the Unitednext Statesgeneral untilelection atas leastprovided two-thirdsby ofarticle theXXI, legislaturesConstitution of theArizona. several states have made application on the same subjects.
3. That this application shall be considered as covering the same subject matter as the applications from other states to Congress to call a convention to set a limit on the number of terms that a person may be elected to the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, and this application shall be aggregated with same for the purpose of attaining the two-thirds of states necessary to require Congress to call a limited convention on this subject, but shall not be aggregated with any other applications on any other subject.
4. That the Secretary of State of the State of Arizona transmit a copy of this Resolution to the President and Secretary of the United States Senate, the Speaker, Clerk and Judiciary Committee Chairman of the United States House of Representatives, each Member of Congress from the State of Arizona and the presiding officers of each house of the several state legislatures, requesting their cooperation.
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
Sponsors
- Sylvia Allen · Cosponsor
- Lupe Contreras · Cosponsor
- John Kavanagh · Cosponsor
- Warren Petersen · Primary
- Bob Worsley · Cosponsor
- Steve Smith · Cosponsor
- Jamescita Peshlakai · Cosponsor
- Sine Kerr · Cosponsor
- Karen Fann · Cosponsor
- Andrea Dalessandro · Cosponsor
- Judy Burges · Cosponsor
- Sean Bowie · Cosponsor
- Nancy Barto · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 80 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Warren Petersen Republican
Co-sponsors (12)
- Sylvia Allen Republican
- Lupe Contreras Democrat Voted No
- John Kavanagh Republican
- Bob Worsley
- Steve Smith
- Jamescita Peshlakai Voted No
- Sine Kerr
- Karen Fann
- Andrea Dalessandro Voted No
- Judy Burges
- Sean Bowie Voted No
- Nancy Barto
Not signed on (80)
80 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 80 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 47% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Nay |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Nay |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Judy Burges | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Nay |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Nay |
| Rick Gray | — | Nay |
| Robert Meza | — | Nay |
| Sean Bowie | — | Nay |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Nay |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Nay |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Nay |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
Per-member breakdown not published by this state.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SCR 1005?
- SCR 1005 is sponsored by Sylvia Allen (Republican), Lupe Contreras (Democrat), John Kavanagh (Republican), Warren Petersen (Republican), Bob Worsley, Steve Smith, Jamescita Peshlakai, Sine Kerr, Karen Fann, Andrea Dalessandro, Judy Burges, Sean Bowie, and Nancy Barto.
- What is the current status of SCR 1005?
- This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCR 1005?
- Track SCR 1005 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCR 1005
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCR 1005
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →