senior property valuation freeze; income
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SCR 1007 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SCR 1007.
You're tracking SCR 1007
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SCR 1007 — senior property valuation freeze; income
Last action — passed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
31 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent updates to SCR 1007 clarify the application process for residents seeking property valuation protection. Specifically, it emphasizes that residents must submit necessary documentation by September 1 to be considered for the current year; otherwise, their application will be processed for the following year. Additionally, the language has been modified to ensure that the income limits for eligibility remain clear, without changing the actual limits. This is important because it underscores the deadlines residents must meet and helps ensure they understand the requirements to maintain their property valuation protection.
SCR1007 - 532R - SH Ver SenateHouse Engrossed Senate Bill State of Arizona Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the constitution of Arizona;
(7) A resident of this state who is sixty-five years of age or older may apply to the county assessor for a property valuation protection option on the person's primary residence, including not more than ten acres of undeveloped appurtenant land. To be eligible for the property valuation protection option, the resident shall make application must apply to and furnish documentation required by the assessor on or before September 1. If the resident fails to file the application on or before September 1, the assessor shall process the application for the subsequent year. If the resident files an application with the assessor on or before September 1, the assessor shall notify the resident whether the application is accepted or denied on or before December 1. The resident may apply for a property valuation protection option after residing in the primary residence for two years. If one person owns the property, the person's total income from all sources including nontaxable income shall not exceed four hundred per cent percent of the supplemental security income benefit rate established by section 1611(b)(1) of the social security act. act. If If the property is owned by two or more persons, including a husband and wife, at least one of the owners must be sixty‑five years of age or older and the owners' combined total income from all sources including nontaxable income shall not exceed five hundred per cent percent of the supplemental security income benefit rate established by section 1611(b)(1) of the social security act. Theact. assessor shall review the owner's income qualifications on a triennial basis and shall use the owner's average total income during the previous three years for the review. If the county assessor approves a property valuation protection option, the value of the primary residence shall remain fixed at the valuation determined pursuant to subsection (3) of this section that is in effect during the year the property valuation protection option is filed and as long as the owner remains eligible. To remain eligible, the county assessor shall require a qualifying resident to reapply for the property valuation protection option every three years and shall send a notice of reapplication to qualifying residents six months before the three year reapplication requirement. If title to the property is conveyed to any person who does not qualify for the property valuation protection option, the property valuation protection option terminates, and the property shall revert to its current full cash value. For the purposes of this subsection, "income from all sources including nontaxable income" includes gains realized on equity and interest-bearing investments, but does not include any amount of the original investment recovered in the transaction.
The assessor shall review the owner's income qualifications on a triennial basis and shall use the owner's average total income during the previous three years for the review. If the county assessor approves a property valuation protection option, the value of the primary residence shall remain fixed at the valuation determined pursuant to subsection (3) of this section that is in effect during the year the property valuation protection option is filed and as long as the owner remains eligible. To remain eligible, the county assessor shall require a qualifying resident to reapply for the property valuation protection option every three years and shall send a notice of reapplication to qualifying residents six months before the three year reapplication requirement. If title to the property is conveyed to any person who does not qualify for the property valuation protection option, the property valuation protection option terminates, and the property shall revert to its current full cash value. For the purposes of this subsection, "income from all sources including nontaxable income" includes gains realized on equity and interest-bearing investments, but does not include any amount of the original investment recovered in the transaction.
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
passed
-
house placed on consent calendar
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
Sponsors
- Gail Griffin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gail Griffin Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 59 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Not Voting |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Judy Burges | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Not Voting |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Robert Meza | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Yea |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SCR 1007?
- SCR 1007 is sponsored by Gail Griffin (Republican).
- What is the current status of SCR 1007?
- This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SCR 1007?
- Track SCR 1007 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SCR 1007
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SCR 1007
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →