HB 2260 — commercial license; defensive driving school
Last action — vetoed by governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
99 added · 24 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of HB 2260 introduces a $5 surcharge for individuals attending court-authorized diversion programs, including defensive driving schools, which will help fund the judicial collection enhancement fund. Additionally, it clarifies that individuals with a commercial driver license can now participate in defensive driving programs, which was previously restricted. These changes matter because they aim to make defensive driving courses more accessible while generating additional funds for the judicial system.
HB2260 - 532R - HS Ver HouseSenate Engrossed House Bill State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2260 AN ACT amending sections 12-114, 28‑3392 and 28‑3394, Arizona Revised Statutes;
amending title 28, chapter 8, article 7, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 28-3394.01;
amending section 28-3396, Arizona Revised Statutes;
Section 1. Section 28-3392,12-114, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE12-114. Surcharge on court ordered diversion programs for traffic offenses;
deposit A. If a court authorizes individuals charged with civil or criminal traffic offenses to attend a court authorized diversion program, including a defensive driving school program, it shall require the assessment of a five dollar surcharge on the fees charged by such court authorized diversion programs. The surcharge applies to every individual who attends a court authorized diversion program, including an individual who holds a commercial driver license.
B. A court or a court authorized diversion program shall collect the five dollar surcharge and remit the surcharge to the supreme court which shall deposit, pursuant to sections 35‑146 and 35‑147, the surcharge in the judicial collection enhancement fund.
END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Section 28-3392, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
eligibility A. A A. A To the extent a court is in compliance with title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, the court:
(b) Shall allow an individual who holds a commercial driver license and who is issued a citation for a civil traffic moving violation pursuant to chapter 3, article 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 or 15 of this title or a local civil traffic ordinance relating to the same subject matter to attend a defensive driving school for the purposes provided in this article only if the individual was driving a vehicle requiring a class D license,license or a class M license and the vehicle was not being used for commercial purposes.
END_STATUTE Sec. 2. SectionSec. 3. Section 28-3394, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE28-3394. Successful course completion A. IfA. Except as provided in section 28‑3394.01, if an eligible individual successfully completes the course at a defensive driving school:
2. The department shall not include a record of the civil or criminal traffic citation for which the individual attended the school on the individual's driving recordrecord. for the purposes of section 28-3306, subsection A, paragraph 3.
C. NotwithstandingEND_STATUTE subsectionSec. 4. Title A,28, paragraphchapter 28, ofarticle this7, section,Arizona ifRevised anStatutes, individual is aamended commercialby driveradding licensesection holder,28-3394.01, a record of the civil or criminal traffic citation for which the individual attended defensive driving school is not confidential and shall be disclosed for purposes of title 49, code of federal regulations and to insurers.read:
END_STATUTESTART_STATUTE28-3394.01. Commercial driver license holders A. The court shall forward to the department an abstract of a record of judgment against a person who holds a commercial driver LICENSE and who is eligible to attend defensive driving school pursuant to section 28‑3392. The department shall include a record of the civil traffic violation on the person's driving record. The department or an agency of this state may not consider the violation for the purpose of determining whether the person's driver license SHOULD be suspended or revoked.
B. If the person described in subsection A of this section successfully completes the course at a defensive driving school:
1. the court may not impose a civil penalty for the traffic citation for which the individual attended the school.
2. For private passenger motor vehicle liability insurance, an INSURER shall consider the traffic citation equivalent to a dismissed traffic citation pursuant to section 28‑3394 except that an insurer of a commercial motor vehicle may consider the citation for underwriting and rating purposes for any policy covering the vehicle.
END_STATUTE Sec. 5. Section 28-3396, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE28-3396. Court diversion fee A. The presiding judge of each court shall:
1. Set the amount of the court diversion fee that an individual, including an individual who holds a commercial driver license, who attends a defensive driving school may be assessed.
2. Charge an individual a forty‑five dollar surcharge if the individual attends a defensive driving school.
3. Immediately inform the supreme court in writing of the amount of the court diversion fee that is established for the court and the total cost to attend a defensive driving school.
4. Immediately inform the supreme court in writing of any changes in the total cost to attend a defensive driving school.
B. Payment of the court diversion fee and surcharge is in lieu of payment of a civil penalty or criminal fine and any surcharge that are imposed for a traffic violation.
C. The driving school shall collect the court diversion fee and surcharge before or at the time an individual attends the school. On receipt of the diversion fee, the defensive driving school shall transmit the fee promptly to the appropriate court pursuant to procedures prescribed by the supreme court. On receipt of the surcharge, the defensive driving school shall transmit the surcharge promptly to the state treasurer for deposit, pursuant to sections 35‑146 and 35‑147, as follows:
1. The first ten million four hundred thousand dollars in revenue annually in the department of public safety forensics fund established by section 41‑1730.
2. All remaining money in the state general fund.
END_STATUTE Sec. 6. Effective date This act is effective from and after August 31, 2019.
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
vetoed by governor
-
transmit to governor
-
passed
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
house placed on consent calendar
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- David Livingston · Cosponsor
- Kevin Payne · Cosponsor
- David Stringer · Cosponsor
- Paul Mosley · Cosponsor
- Jay Lawrence · Cosponsor
- Drew John · Cosponsor
- David L. Cook · Cosponsor
- Noel W. Campbell · Cosponsor
- Russell Bowers · Cosponsor
- Richard C. Andrade · Cosponsor
- Ben Toma · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 82 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (10)
Not signed on (82)
82 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 82 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Judy Burges | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Not Voting |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Not Voting |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Robert Meza | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Yea |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2260?
- HB 2260 is sponsored by David Livingston (Republican), Kevin Payne (Republican), David Stringer, Paul Mosley, Jay Lawrence, Drew John, David L. Cook, Noel W. Campbell, Russell Bowers, Richard C. Andrade, and Ben Toma.
- What is the current status of HB 2260?
- This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2260?
- Track HB 2260 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2260
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2260
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →