HB 2516 — school buildings; airports
Last action — senate second reading
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
17 added · 93 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of HB 2516 simplifies the requirements for schools near public use airports. It now states that only charter schools and districts planning to build new structures within two miles of an airport must get a safety determination from the FAA, removing broader zoning and local enforcement powers for existing schools. This change focuses on ensuring safety without imposing restrictive regulations on schools that are already in operation, which may facilitate easier planning and construction while still protecting public safety.
HB2516 - 532R - IH Ver REFERENCEHouse TITLE:Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session HOUSE BILL 2516 AN ACT amending Title 15, chapter 1, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 15-153;
school buildings;
airports State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session HB 2516 Introduced by Representative Coleman AN ACT amending Title 15, chapter 1, article 5, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 15-153;
amending section 15‑189.01, Arizona Revised Statutes;
(TEXT OF BILL BEGINS ON NEXT PAGE) Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Arizona:
exception A. NOTWITHSTANDINGA. From and after August 31, 2018, a charter school or school district that is seeking to locate a school within two miles of a public use airport runway shall obtain a determination of no hazard from the federal aviation administration before commencing any otherconstruction law,pursuant eachto municipality14 andcode county:of federal regulations part 77.
1. SHALLB. This REQUIREsection schoolsdoes thatnot areapply operatedto bya charter school districtsor anddistrict school that areexists LOCATEDwithin NEARtwo ANmiles AIRPORTof tOa WHICHpublic 14use CODEairport OFrunway FEDERALas REGULATIONSof PARTJanuary 771, APPLIes2015, TOunless SHOW THAT A DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AS PART OF THE LIFE AND SAFETY BUILDING CODES PERMITTING PROCESS. 2. MAY ENACT AND ENFORCE ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT schools that arecharter operated by school districtsseeks FROMto LOCATINGbuild WITHINa ANnew AIRPORT'Sstructure.END_STATUTE PUBLISHEDSec. 2. Effective sixtydate DAY-NIGHTThis AVERAGEact DECIBELis LEVELeffective CONTOURfrom AREA,and ORafter AAugust COMPARABLE31, AIRPORT2018. ESTABLISHED ZONE.
B. THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO A SCHOOL that is operated by a school district and THAT EXISTS WITHIN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT AS DEPICTED ON THE MAP REQUIRED BY SECTION 28-8486 AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015, uNLESS THe SCHOOL district or school SEEKS TO BUILD A STRUCTURE that is HIGHER THAN THat school's CURRENT FACILITY. END_STATUTE Sec. 2. Section 15-189.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE15-189.01. Charter schools;
zoning;
development fees A. Charter schools shall be classified the same as public schools that are operated by a school district for the purposes of zoning and the assessment of zoning fees, site plan fees and development fees, including any required hearings or applications. Municipalities and counties shall allow a charter school to be established and operate at a location or in a facility for which the zoning regulations of the county or municipality cannot legally prohibit schools operated by school districts, except that a county or municipality may adopt zoning regulations that prohibit a charter school from operating on property that is less than an acre in size and that is located within an existing single family residence zoning district.
B. Except as provided in subsection D of this section, a charter school is subject to the same level of oversight and the same rules, hearing requirements, application requirements, ordinances, limitations and other requirements, if any, that would be applied to and enforced against a school that is operated by a school district. A municipality or county shall not enforce, or attempt to enforce, any ordinance, procedure or process against a charter school that cannot be legally enforced against a school district. Voluntary compliance of by a school district in with the zoning regulations of a municipality or a county does not result in the application of those zoning regulations to a charter school.
C. The construction and development of the charter school facility shall be subject to the building codes, including life and safety building codes, of the municipality, county or state in which the charter school facility is located.
D. Municipalities and counties shall adopt procedures to ensure that hearings and administrative reviews involving charter schools are scheduled and conducted on an expedited basis and that charter schools receive a final determination from the municipality or county within thirty days after the beginning of processes requiring only an administrative review and within ninety days after the beginning of processes requiring a public hearing and allowing an appeal to a board of adjustment, city or town governing body or board of supervisors.
E. Except as provided in subsection subsections F, H and I of this section, no a political subdivision of this state may not enact or interpret any law, rule or ordinance in a manner that conflicts with this section.
F. Notwithstanding subsections A and B of this section, a charter school shall not be established or operated on commercial or residential property in an age restricted community that is located in unorganized territory.
G. A charter school may authorize a third party to apply to a municipality or county as the representative of that charter school for any application or action prescribed in subsections A through D of this section.
H. NOTWITHSTANDING any other provision of this section, each municipality and county:
1. SHALL REQUIRE charter schools that are LOCATED NEAR AN AIRPORT tO which 14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS PART 77 APPLIes TO SHOW THAT A DETERMINATION OF NO HAZARD HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION AS PART OF THE LIFE AND SAFETY BUILDING CODES PERMITTING PROCESS. 2. MAY ENACT AND ENFORCE ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS THAT PROHIBIT charter schools FROM LOCATING WITHIN AN AIRPORT'S PUBLISHED sixty DAY-NIGHT AVERAGE DECIBEL LEVEL CONTOUR AREA, OR A COMPARABLE AIRPORT ESTABLISHED ZONE.
I. THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO A CHARTER SCHOOL THAT EXISTS WITHIN THE TERRITORY IN THE VICINITY OF A PUBLIC AIRPORT AS DEPICTED ON THE MAP REQUIRED BY SECTION 28-8486 AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015, uNLESS THat charter SCHOOL SEEKS TO BUILD A STRUCTURE that is HIGHER THAN THE charter school's CURRENT FACILITY.
END_STATUTE
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- Douglas Coleman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 42 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (60)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2516?
- HB 2516 is sponsored by Douglas Coleman.
- What is the current status of HB 2516?
- This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 2516?
- Track HB 2516 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2516
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2516
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →