SB 1014 — municipal zoning; rezoning protests
Last action — failed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
33 added · 34 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to SB 1014 clarify the process for notifying property owners about zoning amendments and specify that a protest must come from owners of twenty percent or more of the property within a defined area. Previously, the bill included slightly different language about the area considered for protests. This matters because the changes aim to ensure that local governments have a consistent way to handle protests and vote requirements, thus potentially enhancing community engagement in zoning decisions.
SB1014 - 532R - SH Ver SenateHouse Engrossed Senate Bill State of Arizona Senate Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 1014 AN ACT amending section 9-462.04, Arizona Revised Statutes;
H. If the owners of twenty percent or more of the property by area and number of lots, tracts and condominium units either within the zoning area of the affected property or the area within one hundred fifty feet, including all rights-of-way,rights‑of-way, of the zoning area file a protest in writing against a proposed amendment, the change shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of three‑fourths of all members of the governing body of the municipality. If any members of the governing body are unable to vote on such a question because of a conflict of interest, then the required number of votes for passage of the question shall be three‑fourths of the remaining membership of the governing body, provided that such the required number of votes shall in no event not be less than a majority of the full membership of the legally established governing body. For the purposes of this subsection, the vote shall be rounded to the nearest whole number. A protest filed pursuant to this subsection shall be signed by the property owners opposing the proposed amendment and filed in the office of the clerk of the municipality not later than 12:00 noon one business day before the date on which the governing body will vote on the proposed amendment or on an earlier time and date established by the governing body.
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
failed
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
prefiled.
Sponsors
- John Kavanagh · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on · 56 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- John Kavanagh Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 40 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 50 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 15% | 83% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 23% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Yea |
| Juan Mendez | — | Yea |
| Judy Burges | — | Nay |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Yea |
| Martin Quezada | — | Yea |
| Nancy Barto | — | Nay |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Robert Meza | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Nay |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Yea |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Yea |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Nay |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Nay |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Nay |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1014?
- SB 1014 is sponsored by John Kavanagh (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1014?
- This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1014?
- Track SB 1014 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1014
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1014
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →