Arizona 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 3 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 2514 — HURF distribution; cities, towns, counties

Last action — senate second reading

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 43 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of the bill now includes a more straightforward allocation of funds by specifying that the distribution of $18 million from the Arizona highway user revenue fund will take place in fiscal year 2019-2020, rather than stating it is for each fiscal year thereafter. Additionally, some references to the initial section of the bill and certain percentages have been removed. This change clarifies the timing for the fund distribution and eliminates unnecessary complexity, which may help ensure that local governments receive their funding more effectively.

→
Previous
Latest
HB2514 - 532R - I Ver       REFERENCE TITLE:
HB2514 - 532R - H Ver       House Engrossed         State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session       HOUSE BILL 2514       AN ACT   amending title 28, chapter 18, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 28‑6535;
HURF distribution;
cities, towns, counties       State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session   HB 2514   Introduced by Representatives Cook:
Barton, Campbell, Cardenas, Cobb, Descheenie, Fernandez, Gabaldón, Gonzales, John, Mitchell, Mosley, Nutt, Peten, Shope, Stringer, Thorpe, Toma, Senators Allen S, Borrelli, Fann, Griffin, Kerr, Otondo, Pratt, Smith     AN ACT   amending title 28, chapter 18, article 2, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 28‑6535;
amending section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by section 2 of this act;
repealing section 28-6535, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act;
population A.  Beginning in fiscal year 2019‑2020 and For each fiscal year thereafter, the department shall allocate and the state treasurer shall distribute eighteen million dollars from revenues of the Arizona highway user revenue fund as follows:
population A.  In addition to any other monies distributed to counties, cities and towns pursuant to this article, in fiscal year 2019‑2020, the department shall allocate and the state treasurer shall distribute eighteen million dollars from revenues of the Arizona highway user revenue fund as follows:
B.  Notwithstanding section 28‑6532, for the purposes of this section in fiscal year 2019‑2020 the department shall use the 2016 population estimates from the United States bureau of the census.END_STATUTE Sec. 2.  Section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
B.  Notwithstanding section 28‑6532, for the purposes of this section the department shall use the 2016 population estimates from the United States bureau of the census.END_STATUTE Sec. 2.  Section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
END_STATUTE Sec. 3.  Effective date This act is effective from and after June 30, 2019.
END_STATUTE Sec. 3.  Section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by section 2 of this act, is amended to read:
START_STATUTE28-6538.  Arizona highway user revenue fund distribution;
remaining monies;
highway fund distribution;
contract authorization;
regional transportation plan requirements A.  Each fiscal year the department shall allocate and the state treasurer shall distribute revenues of the Arizona highway user revenue fund remaining after the distribution provided in sections 28‑6534, 28‑6535 and 28‑6537 as follows:
1.  To the state highway fund, fifty and one‑half percent.
2.  To the counties, nineteen percent.
3.  To the incorporated cities and towns, twenty‑seven and one‑half percent.
4.  To incorporated cities with a population of three hundred thousand or more persons, three percent.
B.  At least twelve and six‑tenths percent of the revenues allocated each year to the state highway fund pursuant to subsection A of this section shall be further distributed in the following proportions and for the following purposes:
1.  Seventy‑five percent of the revenues shall be spent, pledged or accumulated in counties with a population of one million five hundred thousand or more persons for the design, right‑of‑way purchase or construction of controlled access highways that are included in the regional transportation plan of the county and that are accepted into the state highway system either as a state route or as a state highway.
2.  Twenty‑five percent of the revenues shall be spent, pledged or accumulated in counties with a population of more than eight hundred thousand but less than one million five hundred thousand persons for:
(a)  The design, right‑of‑way purchase or construction of controlled access highways that are included in the regional transportation plan of the county and that are accepted into the state highway system either as a state route or as a state highway or related grade separations of controlled access highways that are included in the regional transportation plan of the county.
(b)  Notwithstanding sections 28‑6993 and 28‑6995, the design, right‑of‑way purchase, construction, standard and reduced clearance grade separation, extension and widening of arterial streets and highways that are included in the regional transportation plan of the county.
C.  Of the monies allocated to the state highway fund pursuant to subsection A of this section, not more than five million dollars annually shall be spent for the acquisition, construction or improvement of entry roads to state parks or roads in state parks.
D.  Expenditures for state matching monies for the federal interstate system shall be in addition to the amount provided in subsection B of this section.
E.  The department may contract with a county, city or town to allow the county, city or town to construct the streets or highways prescribed in subsection B of this section.
F.  A county described in subsection B of this section and the cities and towns in the county, through their regional planning agency, shall list transportation corridors by priority in the regional transportation plan.  The regional transportation plan may also provide a suggested construction schedule for the transportation corridors contained in the plan.
END_STATUTE Sec. 4.  Delayed repeal Section 28-6535, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, is repealed from and after October 31, 2020.
Sec. 5.  Legislative intent It is the legislature's intent that the eighteen million dollars distributed pursuant to section 28‑6535, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, be distributed from the anticipated increase in Arizona highway user revenue fund monies in fiscal year 2019‑2020.
Sec. 6.  Effective date A.  Section 28-6535, Arizona Revised Statutes, as added by this act, and section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by section 2 of this act, are effective from and after June 30, 2019.
B.  Section 28-6538, Arizona Revised Statutes, as amended by section 3 of this act, is effective from and after October 31, 2020.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. senate second reading

  2. senate first reading

  3. transmit to senate

  4. passed

  5. house placed on consent calendar

  6. house second reading

  7. house first reading.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 67 not signed on · 18 voted No

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed

Passed 36 Yea · 20 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 281603
Democrat 3100
Republican 5301
Total 362004
% of votes cast 60%33%0%7%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
BEN TOMA — Nay
Anthony T. Kern — Yea
Athena Salman — Yea
Becky A. Nutt — Nay
Bob Thorpe — Yea
Brenda Barton — Yea
Charlene R. Fernandez — Yea
César Chávez — Not Voting
Daniel Hernandez — Yea
Darin Mitchell — Yea
David L. Cook — Yea
David Stringer — Yea
Diego Espinoza — Not Voting
Douglas Coleman — Yea
Drew John — Yea
Eddie Farnsworth — Nay
Eric Descheenie — Yea
Gerae Peten — Yea
Heather Carter — Nay
Isela Blanc — Yea
Jay Lawrence — Yea
Jill Norgaard — Yea
John M. Allen — Nay
Kelli Butler — Nay
Kelly Townsend — Yea
Ken Clark — Yea
Kirsten Engel — Nay
Macario Saldate — Nay
Maria Syms — Yea
Mark A. Cardenas — Yea
Michelle B. Ugenti-Rita — Nay
Michelle Udall — Nay
Noel W. Campbell — Yea
Pamela Powers Hannley — Yea
Paul Boyer — Nay
Paul Mosley — Yea
Randall Friese — Yea
Ray D. Martinez — Yea
Rebecca Rios — Nay
Regina E. Cobb — Yea
Reginald Bolding — Yea
Richard C. Andrade — Nay
Russell Bowers — Nay
Todd A. Clodfelter — Nay
Tony Navarrete — Not Voting
Travis W. Grantham — Nay
Wenona Benally — Yea
Denise “Mitzi” Epstein Democrat Nay
Lela Alston Democrat Yea
Rosanna Gabaldón Democrat Yea
Sally Ann Gonzales Democrat Yea
David Livingston Republican Not Voting
J.D. Mesnard Republican Nay
Jeff Weninger Republican Yea
Kevin Payne Republican Yea
Mark Finchem Republican Nay
Thomas "T.J." Shope Republican Yea
Timothy "Tim" Dunn Republican Yea
Tony Rivero Republican Yea
Venden "Vince" Leach Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 2514?
HB 2514 is sponsored by Sally Ann Gonzales (Democrat), Thomas "T.J." Shope (Republican), Sylvia Allen (Republican), Gail Griffin (Republican), Steve Smith, Frank Pratt, Bob Thorpe, David Stringer, Lisa Otondo, Sine Kerr, Karen Fann, Sonny Borrelli, Ben Toma, Gerae Peten, Becky A. Nutt, Paul Mosley, Darin Mitchell, Drew John, Rosanna Gabaldón, Charlene R. Fernandez, Eric Descheenie, Regina E. Cobb, Mark A. Cardenas, Noel W. Campbell, Brenda Barton, and David L. Cook.
What is the current status of HB 2514?
This bill died with 53rd Legislature - 2nd Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2514?
Track HB 2514 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2514

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 2514

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →