municipalities; parking; public vehicles.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2209 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2209.
You're tracking HB 2209
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2209 — municipalities; parking; public vehicles.
Last action — signed by governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
3 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 6 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill HB 2209 removed the approval and filing details that were previously included in the text. These details included specific references to the governor's approval and the filing date with the Secretary of State. This change simplifies the bill's language and focuses on the core provisions without extraneous information. It matters because it streamlines the document, making it easier to understand while still conveying the main points about enabling real-time voice communication through broadband technology.
HB2209Chapter 0294 - 532R - S Ver of HB2209 Senate Engrossed House Bill State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature Second Regular Session CHAPTER HOUSE BILL 2209 AN ACT amending Title 40, chapter 2, article 1, Arizona Revised Statutes, by adding section 40-212;
END_STATUTE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MAY 16, 2018.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MAY 16, 2018.
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current html
- Engrossed Senate Engrossed Version html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill adds a new section to clarify the regulatory status of internet protocol services and explicitly states they are not to be treated as public service corporations.
-
Title 40, chapter 2, article 1
START_STATUTE40-212. Internet protocol services; definitions A. A person that offers, furnishes or provides for profit or otherwise internet protocol-enabled service or voice over internet protocol service is not providing message transmission service to the public and is not a public service corporation. The commission may not regulate, directly or indirectly, the entry, exit, rates, terms, conditions or service quality standards of internet protocol-enabled service or voice over internet protocol service.
The new section ensures that internet protocol services are not treated as public utility services and are exempt from specific regulatory oversight.
-
Title 40, chapter 2, article 1
B. This section does not affect or modify: 1. The commission's authority to enforce the requirements on voice over internet protocol service that are provided for or allowed by federal law, including the collection of nondiscriminatory 911 or E911 fees, telecommunications relay service fees and universal service fees. 2. A person's obligations under or any right granted to a person by 47 United States Code sections 251 and 252. 3. The commission's jurisdiction over intrastate switched access rates, including the implementation of federal law with respect to intercarrier compensation.
This part clarifies that existing federal and state regulations concerning certain fees and obligations remain in effect.
-
Title 40, chapter 2, article 1
C. For the purposes of this section: 1. 'Internet protocol-enabled service' means a service, functionality or application that uses internet protocol or a successor protocol and enables an end user to send or receive a voice, data or video communication in internet protocol format or a successor format. 2. 'Voice over internet protocol service' means a service that meets all of the following: (a) Enables real-time, two-way voice communication that originates from or terminates at the user's location in internet protocol or a successor protocol. (b) Uses a broadband connection from the user's location.
This section provides definitions for key terms related to internet protocol services.
Action History
-
signed by governor
-
transmit to governor
-
passed
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
house placed on consent calendar
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- Nancy Barto · Cosponsor
- Travis W. Grantham · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 91 not signed on · 20 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (1)
Not signed on (91)
91 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 91 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 42 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 23% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 25 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 13% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Dalessandro | — | Yea |
| Bob Worsley | — | Yea |
| David Bradley | — | Yea |
| Frank Pratt | — | Yea |
| Jamescita Peshlakai | — | Nay |
| Juan Mendez | — | Nay |
| Judy Burges | — | Yea |
| Karen Fann | — | Yea |
| Kate Brophy McGee | — | Yea |
| Katie Hobbs | — | Yea |
| Kimberly Yee | — | Yea |
| Lisa Otondo | — | Nay |
| Martin Quezada | — | Nay |
| Nancy Barto | — | Yea |
| Olivia Cajero Bedford | — | Yea |
| Rick Gray | — | Yea |
| Robert Meza | — | Yea |
| Sean Bowie | — | Yea |
| Sine Kerr | — | Yea |
| Sonny Borrelli | — | Yea |
| Steve Farley | — | Yea |
| Steve Smith | — | Yea |
| Steve Yarbrough | — | Yea |
| Catherine Miranda | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Lupe Contreras | Democrat | Yea |
| David C. Farnsworth | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Griffin | Republican | Yea |
| John Kavanagh | Republican | Yea |
| Sylvia Allen | Republican | Yea |
| Warren Petersen | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 47 | 11 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 18% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2209?
- HB 2209 is sponsored by Nancy Barto and Travis W. Grantham.
- What is the current status of HB 2209?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2209?
- Track HB 2209 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2209
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2209
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →