HB 2239 — incompetent, nonrestorable defendants; involuntary commitment
Last action — signed by governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2017. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
542 added · 527 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill HB 2239 clarifies the definition of a person deemed incompetent to stand trial, specifically emphasizing their ability to consult with legal counsel. Additionally, it removes certain provisions about the consequences of being found incompetent, streamlining the process of determining eligibility for court-ordered treatment. These changes are significant because they aim to ensure that individuals receive appropriate evaluations and treatment, which could help them potentially regain competency to participate in their defense.
HB2239Chapter 0059 - 531R - H Ver of HB2239 House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-third Legislature First Regular Session CHAPTER 59 HOUSE BILL 2239 AN ACT amending sections 13-4501, 13-4508 and 13-4517, Arizona Revised Statutes;
E. F. The administration may conduct jointly with a school district, directly or indirectly, an educational evaluation pursuant to sections 15‑765 and 15‑766 for nonadjudicated youth. The evaluation information may be shared by and among authorized personnel employed by the administration and the department of education, or authorized personnel from the local education agency, for purposes of ensuring the provision of special education and related services as required by the individuals with disabilities education act (20 United States Code sections 1400 through 1415).END_STATUTE1415). Sec. 10. Section 36-533, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
END_STATUTE Sec. 10. Section 36-533, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
5. 6. During any period of outpatient treatment under subsection A, paragraph 2 of this section, if the medical director of the outpatient treatment facility in charge of the patient's care determines, in concert with the medical director of an inpatient mental health treatment facility who has agreed to accept the patient, that the patient is in need of immediate acute inpatient psychiatric care because of behavior that is dangerous to self or to others, the medical director of the outpatient treatment facility may order a peace officer to apprehend and transport the patient to the inpatient treatment facility pending a court determination on an amended order under paragraph 4 5 of this subsection. The patient may be detained and treated at the inpatient treatment facility for a period of no more than forty‑eight hours, exclusive of weekends and holidays, from the time that the patient is taken to the inpatient treatment facility. The medical director of the outpatient treatment facility shall file the motion for an amended court order requesting inpatient treatment no later than the next working day following the patient being taken to the inpatient treatment facility. Any period of detention within the inpatient treatment facility pending issuance of an amended order shall not increase the total period of commitment originally ordered by the court or, when added to the period of inpatient treatment provided by the original order and any other amended orders, exceed the maximum period allowed for an order for inpatient treatment pursuant to subsection F of this section. If a patient is ordered to undergo inpatient treatment pursuant to an amended order, the medical director of the outpatient treatment facility shall inform the patient of the patient's right to judicial review and to consult with an attorney pursuant to section 36‑546.
Q. If the court does not find a person to be in need of treatment and a prosecutor filed a petition pursuant to section 13‑4517, the evaluation agency, within twenty‑four hours, shall notify the prosecuting agency of its finding. The court shall order the medical director to detain the person for an additional twenty‑four hours to allow the prosecuting agency to be notified. If the court has retained jurisdiction pursuant to section 13‑4517, subsection C, the court may remand the person to the custody of the sheriff for further disposition pursuant to section 13‑4517, subsection A, paragraph 2 or 3.
C. D. If criminal charges against a patient involving death or serious physical injury or a violation of title 13, chapter 14 are dismissed the patient is undergoing court-ordered treatment as the result of a petition filed by a prosecuting agency pursuant to section 13‑4517, the medical director of the mental health treatment agency shall notify the court and the prosecuting agency if a civil commitment order issued pursuant to this chapter expires or is terminated, or if the patient is discharged to outpatient treatment. The medical director shall provide this notice by mail at least five days before the anticipated date of the expiration, termination or discharge. This subsection does not apply to amended orders that are a result of the patient's need for acute or emergency care during the period of court‑ordered treatment.
END_STATUTE APPROVED BY THE GOVERNOR MARCH 24, 2017.
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE MARCH 24, 2017.
View plain text versions (3)
- Chaptered Chaptered Version Current html
- Engrossed House Engrossed Version html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
signed by governor
-
transmit to governor
-
transmit to house
-
passed
-
senate second reading
-
senate first reading
-
transmit to senate
-
passed
-
house second reading
-
house first reading.
Sponsors
- Eddie Farnsworth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 2239?
- HB 2239 is sponsored by Eddie Farnsworth.
- What is the current status of HB 2239?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 17, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2239?
- Track HB 2239 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2239
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2239
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →