An Act relating to the office of administrative hearings; relating to the types of proceedings handled by t...
The bill revises the roles and powers of the chief administrative law judge and administrative law judges, including hiring authority and compensation. It outlines procedures for administrative hearings and the entities that may utilize these services.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 7 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 7.
You're tracking HB 7
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 7 — An Act relating to the office of administrative hearings; relating to the types of proceedings handled by the office of administrative hearings; relating to the entities that may use the services of the office of administrative hearings; relating to the duties of the chief administrative law judge, including the power to hire professional staff; relating to the qualifications and powers of administrative law judges, including subpoena power; relating to the compensation of the chief administrative law judge; relating to complaints against administrative law judges and hearing officers; relating to reimbursement for costs incurred by the office of administrative hearings; relating to procedures for requesting and conducting proceedings of the office of administrative hearings; and providing for an effective date.
Last action — (H) REFERRED TO STATE AFFAIRS
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 33rd Legislature (2023-2024). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill updates procedures and responsibilities for the office of administrative hearings in Alaska.
The bill revises the roles and powers of the chief administrative law judge and administrative law judges, including hiring authority and compensation. It outlines procedures for administrative hearings and the entities that may utilize these services.
Bill Text
- HB 7 View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends existing statutes to clarify and define the roles, duties, and powers of the chief administrative law judge and administrative law judges, as well as the procedures for the office of administrative hearings in Alaska.
-
AS 18.80.120(b)
AS 44.64.040 - 44.64.055→ AS 44.64.040 and 44.64.050This change updates the reference to applicable procedures for hearings.
-
AS 39.25.120(c)(20)
AND→ ,This modifies the list of personnel to include professional staff of the office.
-
AS 44.64.010(d)
NOT LESS THAN STEP A NOR MORE THAN STEP F,→ that is equal to a step inThis change establishes the salary of the chief administrative law judge as equal to a specific step in the salary range instead of limiting it to a specific range.
-
AS 44.64.020
UPON→ based onThis change adjusts the language regarding the assignment of judges to preside over hearings.
-
AS 44.64.020
ALTERNATE→ alternativeThis modifies the terminology used for dispute resolution.
-
AS 44.64.030(b)
OR OTHER PROCEEDING OF THATThis change simplifies the wording related to types of proceedings the office can conduct.
-
AS 44.64.040(a)
TWO→ FOURThis change increases the required years of legal practice for administrative law judges prior to employment.
-
AS 44.64.040(b)
ALTERNATE→ alternativeThis modifies language to be consistent with the changes made in other sections regarding dispute resolution.
-
AS 44.64.040(c)
APPOINTED TO A POSITION THAT IS LESS THAN FULL TIMEThis simplifies the requirements regarding the employment status of administrative law judges.
-
AS 44.64.050(c)
[(1)]This change updates the enumeration format in the complaint process.
-
AS 44.64.050(c)
[(2)]This change updates the enumeration format in the complaint process.
-
AS 44.64.060(a)
or thaThis corrects a typographical error in the text.
Action History
-
(H) REFERRED TO STATE AFFAIRS
-
(H) STA, JUD, FIN
-
(H) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
-
(H) Prefile released 1/9/23
Sponsors
- Sara Hannan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (64)
64 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 64 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 7?
- HB 7 is sponsored by Sara Hannan (D).
- What is the current status of HB 7?
- This bill died with 33rd Legislature (2023-2024). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 7?
- Track HB 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 7
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 7
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →