SB 129 — An Act relating to information on judicial officers provided in election pamphlets.
Last action — (S) REFERRED TO RULES
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 32nd Legislature (2021-2022). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
39 added · 74 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of SB 129 changes how information about judges is presented during retention elections. Originally, the bill required judges seeking retention to submit a 300-word statement and details about their qualifications, but the new version removes that requirement and instead mandates that the judicial council provide a 600-word evaluation of each judge, including any public reprimands or suspensions. This change is significant because it shifts the focus from self-reported information by judges to an evaluation from an independent body, potentially increasing transparency and accountability in the judicial election process.
32-LS0751\N32-LS0751\B CS FOR SENATE BILL NO.
129(JUD)129 IN THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRTY-SECOND LEGISLATURE -SECOND- FIRST SESSION BY THESENATOR SENATEMYERS JUDICIARYIntroduced: COMMITTEE Referred:
State4/21/21 AffairsReferred: Sponsor(s):
SENATORJudiciary, MYERSState Affairs A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED "An Act relating to information on judicial officers seekingprovided retention in office."election pamphlets." BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA:
AS 15.58.030(g) is amended to read:
(g) Not [NO] later than August 7 of the year in which the state gelar election will be held, a person seeking retention in office as a justice or judge may file with the lieutenant governor the following information, not to exceed 300 words:
(1) a photograph;
(2) information regarding the residency of the justice or judge;
(3) information regarding the military service of the justice or judge;
(4) information regarding the professional activities of the justice or judge, including public outreach and administrative activities;
(5) any additional information that the justice or judge would like published to support the justice's or judge's [AND A STATEMENT ADVOCATING THE] candidacy.
SB0129B -1- CSSB 129(JUD) New Text Underlined [DELETED TEXT BRACKETED] 32-LS0751\N * Sec.
2.
The statement may not exceed 600 words, must [SHALL] reflect the evaluation of each justice or judge conducted by the judicial council according to lawlaw, and,and except for information required by law to be kept confidential, must contain,[SHALL] incontain fewerthe thanfollowing 1,200information, wordsexcept total,when (1)required for a superior court judge or district court judge subjecto retention, (A) a statement written by thelaw judge, not to exceedbe 150kept words,confidential: describing the professional philosophy of the judge;
(B)(1) a descriptionbrief ofstatement thedescribing judicial,each legal,public reprimand, public censure, or othersuspension educationreceived ofby the judge;justice or judge under AS 22.30.011(d) during the period covered in the evaluation;
(C)and aSB0129A description-1- ofSB the129 businessNew experienceText ofUnderlined and[DELETED professionalTEXT positionsBRACKETED] held32-LS0751\B by(2) background information on the judgejustice inor judge, identifying (A) the precedinglaw 10school years;from which the justice or judge graduated;
(D)(B) athe listprimary practice areas of servicethe organizationsjustice withor whichjudge before appointment, including the judgepercentage isof affiliated;the justice's or judge's pre- appointment career spent as a trial lawyer;
(E)(C) ifthe applicable,types ratings of clients the judgejustice byor lawjudge enforcementrepresented officers,before attorneys,appointment; court system employees, and jurors;
(F)(D) thepro numberbono ofwork decisionsperformed by the judgejustice thator werejudge reviewedbefore andappointment; disposed of by a written decision of an appellate court and the percentage of issues in those decisions that were affirmed by the appellate court;
(G)(E) aelected descriptionoffices ofheld anyby publicthe disciplinaryjustice proceedingsor against the judge;
(H)(F) apolitical self-assessmentparty byoffices theheld judge,by not to exceed 250 words, evaluating the judge'sjustice judicialor performance;judge;
a(G) self-assessmentorganizations underin thiswhich subparagraph may include comments on the judge'sjustice satisfaction with the judge's judicial role, specific contributions to the judiciary or the field of CSSB 129(JUD) -2- SB0129B New Text Underlined [DELETED TEXT BRACKETED] 32-LS0751\N law, growth in legal knowledge and judicial skills, or other measures of judicial abilities that the judge believesis toa becurrent important;member;
(2)and for(H) aclients supremeand courtemployers justiceof ormembers court of appeals judge subject to retention, the informationjustice's requiredor underjudge's (1)(A)household. - (E), (G), and (H) of this subsection;
(3)[A forSTATEMENT aMAY justiceNOT orEXCEED judge600 standingWORDS.] retentionSB for129 the-2- fiiSB0129A e,New aText descriptionUnderlined of[DELETED (A)TEXT previousBRACKETED] political and governmental positions held by the justice or judge, including any political office held;
(B) the justice's or judge's primary practice areas before appointment, including the approximate percentage of the justice's or judge's pre-appointment career spent as a trial lawyer;
(C) the types of clients the justice or judge represented before appointment [SHALL CONTAIN A BRIEF STATEMENT DESCRIBING EACH PUBLIC REPRIMAND, PUBLIC CENSURE, OR SUSPENSION RECEIVED BY THE JUDGE UNDER AS 22.30.011(d) DURING THE PERIOD COVERED IN THE EVALUATION.
A STATEMENT MAY NOT EXCEED 600 WORDS].
SB0129B -3- CSSB 129(JUD) New Text Underlined [DELETED TEXT BRACKETED]
Action History
-
(S) REFERRED TO RULES
-
(S) FN2: ZERO(AJS)
-
(S) FN1: ZERO(GOV)
-
(S) DP: SHOWER, HOLLAND, COSTELLO
-
(S) STA RPT CS(JUD) 3DP NEW TITLE
-
(S) Minutes (SSTA)
-
(S) Moved CSSB 129(JUD) Out of Committee
-
(S) STATE AFFAIRS at 03:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SSTA)
-
(S) <Bill Hearing Rescheduled to 03/24/22>
-
(S) STATE AFFAIRS at 03:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SSTA)
-
(S) Heard & Held
-
(S) STATE AFFAIRS at 03:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) <Bill Hearing Canceled> -- MEETING CANCELED --
-
(S) STATE AFFAIRS at 03:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) FN2: ZERO(AJS)
-
(S) FN1: ZERO(GOV)
-
(S) AM: HUGHES
-
(S) NR: SHOWER, KIEHL
-
(S) DP: HOLLAND
-
(S) JUD RPT CS 1DP 2NR 1AM NEW TITLE
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Moved CSSB 129(JUD) Out of Committee
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Heard & Held
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Heard & Held
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Scheduled but Not Heard
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Heard & Held
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) -- Public Testimony -- -- MEETING CANCELED --
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Scheduled but Not Heard
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) Minutes (SJUD)
-
(S) Heard & Held
-
(S) JUDICIARY at 01:30 PM BUTROVICH 205
-
(S) JUD, STA
-
(S) READ THE FIRST TIME - REFERRALS
Sponsors
- Robert Myers · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 64 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (64)
64 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 64 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 129?
- SB 129 is sponsored by Robert Myers (R).
- What is the current status of SB 129?
- This bill died with 32nd Legislature (2021-2022). It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 129?
- Track SB 129 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 129
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 129
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →