HR 8464 — Stopping Fraudulent Payments Act
Last action — Received in the Senate.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 23, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).
-
Mixed recorded votes
1 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
HR 8464 aims to improve oversight of government spending.
This bill focuses on enhancing accountability in government expenditures. It seeks to streamline processes and ensure transparency in how funds are allocated.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers could see enhanced programs funded by wise government spending decisions that support their needs.
- Families: For families, this means potential improvements in government services funded by more accountable spending.
- Small Business: Small businesses may benefit from a more efficient government that allocates resources better, possibly leading to more opportunities.
Summary
Stopping Fraudulent Payments ActThis bill establishes requirements to prevent fraudulent or improper payments from federal programs.Specifically, the bill directs executive agencies to take corrective actions to temporarily pause, condition, or segment payment voucher requests before certifying them if the agencies have sufficient reason to determine that the payments present elevated risks of fraud or improper payments resulting in financial loss to the government. The corrective actions must be (1) based on objective, documented fraud-risk indicators; (2) narrowly applied to the portion of the payments presenting the elevated risk; and (3) limited in duration to the minimum period necessary to verify the eligibility or accuracy of the payments.The Department of the Treasury must return certified payment vouchers to agencies for corrective action if they present an elevated risk of fraud based on an output of Treasury’s Do Not Pay system.The bill also prohibits officers or employees of the federal government from being personally liable for actions taken in good faith under this bill.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
6 added · 24 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of HR 8464 has undergone some changes, including the removal of certain procedural details from earlier drafts. Specifically, lines that outlined the bill's introduction, committee referrals, and sponsorship have been deleted. These changes streamline the bill's presentation, focusing more on its core content rather than the legislative process, which can help make it easier for lawmakers and the public to understand the bill's intent. This matters because it simplifies the communication around the legislation, potentially allowing for more straightforward discussion and debate in the House.
8464 ReportedEngrossed in House (RH)](EH)] <DOC> Union119th CalendarCONGRESS No.2d Session H.
597 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
8464 [Report_______________________________________________________________________ No.AN ACT To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes.
119-684] To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 23, 2026 Mr.
Comer (for himself and Mr.
Arrington) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform June 3, 2026 Additional sponsor:
Mr.
Calvert June 3, 2026 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 23, 2026] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes.
UnionPassed Calendarthe No.House of Representatives June 10, 2026.
597Attest: 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
Clerk.
119th CONGRESS 2d Session H.
8464 [Report_______________________________________________________________________ No.AN ACT To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes.
119-684] _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To amend title 31, United States Code, to authorize pausing and segmenting payments, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________ June 3, 2026 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed Engrossed in House Current html June 10, 2026
- Reported Reported in House html June 03, 2026
- Introduced Introduced in House html April 23, 2026
What Congress says this changes
H. Rept. 119-684Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.
Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.
changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in roman): TITLE 31, UNITED STATES CODE * * * * * * * SUBTITLE III--FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT * * * * * * * CHAPTER 33--DEPOSITING, KEEPING, AND PAYING MONEY * * * * * * * Sec. * * * * * * * SUBCHAPTER II--PAYMENTS * * * * * * * 3337. Authority to pause payments for further review and corrective action. * * * * * * * SUBCHAPTER II--PAYMENTS * * * * * * * Sec. 3325. Vouchers (a) A disbursing official in the executive branch of the United States Government shall-- (1) disburse money only as provided by a voucher certified by-- (A) the head of the executive agency concerned; or (B) an officer or employee of the executive agency having written authorization from the head of the agency to certify vouchers; (2) examine a voucher if necessary to decide if it is-- (A) in proper form; (B) certified and approved; and (C) computed correctly on the facts certified; and (3) except for the correctness of computations on a voucher, compliance with an order to pause a payment pursuant to section 3337(b), or pursuant to payment intercepts or offsets pursuant to section 3716 or 3720A of this title[,,], be held accountable for carrying out clauses (1) and (2) of this subsection. (b) In addition to officers and employees referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B) of this section as having authorization to certify vouchers, members of the armed forces may certify vouchers when authorized, in writing, by the Secretary of Defense or, in the case of the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy, by the Secretary of Homeland Security. (c) On request, the Secretary of the Treasury may provide to the appropriate officer or employee of the United States Government a list of persons receiving periodic payments from the Government. When certified and in proper form, the list may be used as a voucher on which the Secretary may disburse money. (d) The head of an executive agency or an officer or employee of an executive agency referred to in subsection (a)(1)(B), as applicable, shall include with each certified voucher submitted to a disbursing official pursuant to this section the taxpayer identifying number of each person to whom payment may be made under the voucher. * * * * * * * Sec. 3337. Authority to pause payments for further review and corrective action (a) Agency Obligation to Pause Disbursement Requests for Corrective Action.--The head of an agency shall take a corrective action to temporarily delay, condition, or segment a disbursement request before the certification of a payment voucher under section 3325 if, as determined by an official designated by the head of the agency, the agency-- (1) has sufficient reason to determine that the payment presents an elevated risk of fraud based on a fraud-risk indicator or an improper payment resulting in financial loss to the Government as estimated under the requirements of section 3352 in accordance with the statutorily-defined eligibility requirements or other legally-established condition of the program for a payee to be eligible to receive payment; (2) has sufficient reason to determine, based on a notification by the relevant State or local government official in the case of a payment from Federal funds disbursed by a State or local government under a State- administered and federally-funded program, that the payment presents an elevated risk of fraud based on a fraud-risk indicator or an improper payment resulting in financial loss to the Government as estimated under the requirements of section 3352 in accordance with the statutorily-defined eligibility requirements or other legally-established condition of the program for a payee to be eligible to receive payment; or (3) has been notified of an order from the Secretary of the Treasury described under subsection (b). (b) Treasury Obligation to Return Payment Voucher and Issue Corrective Action Order.--Except where otherwise required by law, the Secretary shall promptly notify the relevant certifying official of an order to return a certified payment voucher submitted to a disbursing official under section 3325 and issue a corrective action order to the head of an agency not later than 2 days after the Secretary makes a determination that in accordance with the statutorily-defined eligibility requirements or other legally-established condition of the program for a payee to be eligible to receive payment that such payment presents an elevated risk of fraud based on a fraud- risk indicator or an improper payment resulting in financial loss to the Government based on an output of the Do Not Pay system under section 3354. (c) Agency Documentation and Time-limited Corrective Action.--An action taken by the head of an agency under subsection (a) shall-- (1) be based on an objective, documented fraud-risk indicator; (2) be narrowly applied to the portion of the payment presenting the elevated risk; and (3) be limited in duration to the minimum period necessary, as determined by the head of the agency, to verify eligibility of the payee or accuracy of the payment per any program requirement associated with the payment or as stipulated under law. (d) Payee Notification and Time Limit of Paused Disbursement Requests.--With respect to a disbursement request that has been delayed, conditioned, or segmented pursuant to subsection (a) or a payment voucher that is returned pursuant subsection (b), the head of the agency shall take the following actions: (1) Promptly provide to the payee (not later than 2 days after a determination under subsection (a) or a notification to the agency under subsection (b)), as appropriate, and for a case in which the payment from Federal funds disbursed by a State or local government under a State-administered and federally-funded program also provides to such relevant State or local government official, a notification that-- (A) a disbursement has been temporarily paused, conditioned, or segmented; (B) identifies the nature of the fraud-risk indicator or improper payment relied upon by the agency to make the corrective action determination under subsection (a) or notification to the agency under subsection (b); and (C) outlines the process for the corrective action review period. (2) Use a process tailored to the specific requirements and design of the agency program for a payee, or the State or local government described under paragraph (1), to contest any factual inaccuracy or provide clarifying information during the corrective action review period. (3) Issue such payment not later than 30 days after a determination to take a corrective action is made by the head of the agency under subsection (a) or the agency was notified by the Secretary under subsection (b) of a corrective action order, but not later than 7 days after the date on which the payee contests the corrective action under the process established pursuant to paragraph (2), if the head of the agency determines that the payment does not present an elevated risk of fraud or an improper payment resulting in financial loss to the Government. (e) Segmentation of Low-risk Payments.--To the maximum extent practicable, the head of each agency shall allow a routine, historically consistent payment amount to proceed while temporarily holding an anomalous, unusually large, or high-risk portion of a payment, or class of payments, pending review and resolution of an agency corrective action determination under subsection (a) or a corrective action order under subsection (b). (f) Exemptions for Law Enforcement Activities.--The head of an agency, in consultation with the Secretary and the Attorney General, may waive any provision in this section on a case-by- case basis if notified of or instructed by a Federal law enforcement authority, including an agency Inspector General, that the action will jeopardize an active criminal investigation or legal proceeding related to an effort to defraud the Federal Government or violate sections 3729 through 3733 of title 31 (commonly known as the ``False Claims Act''). (g) Limitation of Liability.--No officer or employee of the Federal Government shall be personally liable for an action taken in good faith under this section. An action taken under this section may not constitute a final determination of eligibility, liability, or wrongdoing on the part of a payee. (h) Rule of Construction for Program Authorizing Statute.-- Nothing in this section may be construed to supersede any other provision of law with respect to any statute that authorizes the payment or program the payment is made under. (i) Regulations.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this section, and annually thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the Director, shall issue regulations and establish procedures to administer the requirements of this section that shall be published in the Federal Register that, at a minimum, specify the following: (1) The minimum seniority of an agency official designated under subsection (a) authorized to make a determination to issue a corrective action. (2) The procedures by which the Secretary of the Treasury will use the Do Not Pay system under section 3354 to make a determination under subsection (b) in accordance with the statutorily-defined eligibility requirements or other legally-established condition of a program for a payee to be eligible to receive payment. (3) The procedure for an agency to dispute an order to return a certified payment voucher and appeal a related corrective action order under subsection (b) to the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, which shall at a minimum include a requirement for the agency to receive a response not later than five days after making such a dispute or appeal to the Department of the Treasury. (4) The minimum information requirements of a notification required under subsection (d)(1). (j) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Director.--The term ``Director'' means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. (2) Fraud-risk indicator.--The term ``fraud-risk indicator'' means an objective data point or analytic signal that indicates an anomalous payment pattern or increase in the volume of a payment amount, a verified data mismatch, network or behavioral anomaly, or match identified by the Do Not Pay system under section 3354 and any payment, account, or payee validation program or service administered by the Secretary that would result in financial loss to the Government. (3) Routine, historically consistent payment amount.--The term ``routine, historically consistent payment amount'' means a payment amount that is consistent with previous payment history of the payee, established program use patterns, or other objective benchmarks determined by the certifying agency. (4) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the Treasury. * * * * * * * CHAPTER 35--ACCOUNTING AND COLLECTION * * * * * * * SUBCHAPTER III--AUDITING AND SETTLING ACCOUNTS * * * * * * * Sec. 3527. General authority to relieve accountable officials and agents from liability (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, the Comptroller General may relieve a present or former accountable official or agent of an agency responsible for the physical loss or deficiency of public money, vouchers, checks, securities, or records, or may authorize reimbursement from an appropriation or fund available for the activity in which the loss or deficiency occurred for the amount of the loss or deficiency paid by the official or agent as restitution, when-- (1) the head of the agency decides that-- (A) the official or agent was carrying out official duties when the loss or deficiency occurred, or the loss or deficiency occurred because of an act or failure to act by a subordinate of the official or agent; and (B) the loss or deficiency was not the result of fault or negligence by the official or agent; (2) the loss or deficiency was not the result of an illegal or incorrect payment, or was made as a result of a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of section 3337; and (3) the Comptroller General agrees with the decision of the head of the agency. (b)(1) The Comptroller General shall relieve an official of the armed forces referred to in subsection (a) responsible for the physical loss or deficiency of public money, vouchers, or records, or a payment described in section 3528(a)(4)(A) of this title, or shall authorize reimbursement, from an appropriation or fund available for reimbursement, of the amount of the loss or deficiency paid by or for the official as restitution, when-- (A) in the case of a physical loss or deficiency-- (i) the Secretary of Defense or the appropriate Secretary of the military department of the Department of Defense (or the Secretary of Homeland Security, in the case of a disbursing official of the Coast Guard when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy) decides that the official was carrying out official duties when the loss or deficiency occurred; (ii) the loss or deficiency was not the result of an illegal or incorrect payment, or was made as a result of a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of section 3337; and (iii) the loss or deficiency was not the result of fault or negligence by the official; or (B) in the case of a payment described in section 3528(a)(4)(A) of this title, the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary of the appropriate military department (or the Secretary of Homeland Security, in the case of a disbursing official of the Coast Guard when the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy), after taking a diligent collection action, finds that the criteria of section 3528(b)(1) of this title are satisfied. (2) The finding of the Secretary involved is conclusive on the Comptroller General. (c) On the initiative of the Comptroller General or written recommendation of the head of an agency, the Comptroller General may relieve a present or former disbursing official of the agency responsible for a deficiency in an account because of an illegal, improper, or incorrect payment, and credit the account for the deficiency, when the Comptroller General decides that the payment was not the result of bad faith or lack of reasonable care by the official. However, the Comptroller General may deny relief when the Comptroller General decides the head of the agency did not carry out diligently collection action under procedures prescribed by the Comptroller General. (d)(1) When the Comptroller General decides it is necessary to adjust the account of an official or agent granted relief under subsection (a) or (c) of this section, the amount of the relief shall be charged-- (A) to an appropriation specifically provided to be charged; or (B) if no specific appropriation, to the appropriation or fund available for the expense of the accountable function when the adjustment is carried out. (2) Subsection (c) of this section does not-- (A) affect the liability, or authorize the relief, of a payee, beneficiary, or recipient of an illegal, improper, or incorrect payment; or (B) relieve an accountable official, the head of an agency, or the Comptroller General of responsibility in carrying out collection action against a payee, beneficiary, or recipient. (e) Relief provided under this section is in addition to relief provided under another law. Sec. 3528. Responsibilities and relief from liability of certifying officials (a) A certifying official certifying a voucher is responsible for-- (1) information stated in the certificate, voucher, and supporting records; (2) the computation of a certified voucher under this section and section 3325 of this title; (3) the legality of a proposed payment under the appropriation or fund involved; (4) repaying a payment-- (A) illegal, improper, or incorrect because of an inaccurate or misleading certificate; (B) prohibited by law; or (C) that does not represent a legal obligation under the appropriation or fund involved[; and]; (5) verifying transportation rates, freight classifications, and other information provided on a Government bill of lading or transportation request, unless the Administrator of General Services has determined that verification by a prepayment audit conducted pursuant to section 3726(a) of this title for a particular mode or modes of transportation, or for an agency or subagency, will not adequately protect the interests of the Government[.]; and (6) complying with an order to take a corrective action to temporarily delay, condition, or segment a disbursement request pursuant to section 3337. (b)(1) The Comptroller General may relieve a certifying official from liability when the Comptroller General decides that-- (A) the certification was based on official records and the official did not know, and by reasonable diligence and inquiry could not have discovered, the correct information[; or]; (B)(i) the obligation was incurred in good faith; (ii) no law specifically prohibited the payment; and (iii) the United States Government received value for payment[.]; or (C) the certification was made as a result of a good faith effort to comply with the requirements of section 3337. (2) The Comptroller General may deny relief when the Comptroller General decides the head of the agency did not carry out diligently collection action under procedures prescribed by the Comptroller General. (c) The Comptroller General shall relieve a certifying official from liability for an overpayment-- (1) to a common carrier under section 3726 of this title when the Comptroller General decides the overpayment occurred only because the administrative audit before payment did not verify transportation rates, freight classifications, or land-grant deductions and the Administrator of General Services has determined that verification by a prepayment audit conducted pursuant to section 3726(a) of this title for a particular mode or modes of transportation, or for an agency or subagency, will not adequately protect the interests of the Government; or (2) provided under a Government bill of lading or transportation request when the overpayment was the result of using improper transportation rates or classifications or the failure to deduct the proper amount under a land-grant law or agreement and the Administrator of General Services has determined that verification by a prepayment audit conducted pursuant to section 3726(a) of this title for a particular mode or modes of transportation, or for an agency or subagency, will not adequately protect the interests of the Government. * * * * * * *
Source: H. Rept. 119-684 · govinfo
Action History
-
Introduced in House
-
Introduced in House
-
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
-
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
-
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 23 - 17.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-684.
-
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. H. Rept. 119-684.
-
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 597.
-
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1345 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8312, H.R. 8464, H. Res. 1335 and S. 2. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8312, H.R. 8464, H. Res. 1335, and S. 2 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit H.R. 8312 and H.R. 8464 and a motion to commit S. 2.
-
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1345. (consideration: CR H4071-4075)
-
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 8312, H.R. 8464, H. Res. 1335 and S. 2. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 8312, H.R. 8464, H. Res. 1335, and S. 2 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for a motion to recommit H.R. 8312 and H.R. 8464 and a motion to commit S. 2.
-
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 8464.
-
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
-
Mr. McGarvey moved to recommit to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. (text: CR H4075)
-
The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
-
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 8464, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Comer demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
-
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4078-4079)
-
On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 213 (Roll no. 219).
-
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 200 (Roll no. 220). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4071-4073)
-
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 200 (Roll no. 220). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H4071-4073)
-
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
-
Received in the Senate.
Sponsors
- Jodey C. Arrington · Cosponsor
- Ken Calvert · Cosponsor
- James Comer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 544 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Comer, James Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Arrington, Jodey C. Republican
- Calvert, Ken Republican
Not signed on (544)
544 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 544 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HR 8464 do?
- Stopping Fraudulent Payments ActThis bill establishes requirements to prevent fraudulent or improper payments from federal programs.Specifically, the bill directs executive agencies to take corrective actions to temporarily pause, condition, or segment payment voucher requests before certifying them if the agencies have sufficient reason to determine that the payments present elevated risks of fraud or improper payments resulting in financial loss to the government. The corrective actions must be (1) based on objective, documented fraud-risk indicators; (2) narrowly applied to the portion of the payments presenting the elevated risk; and (3) limited in duration to the minimum period necessary to verify the eligibility or accuracy of the payments.The Department of the Treasury must return certified payment vouchers to agencies for corrective action if they present an elevated risk of fraud based on an output of Treasury’s Do Not Pay system.The bill also prohibits officers or employees of the federal government from being personally liable for actions taken in good faith under this bill.
- Who sponsors HR 8464?
- HR 8464 is sponsored by Arrington, Jodey C. (Republican), Calvert, Ken (Republican), and Comer, James (Republican).
- What is the current status of HR 8464?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 23, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HR 8464?
- Track HR 8464 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HR 8464
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HR 8464
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →