Provides that contracts between subscribers and attorney in fact are not related party transactions.
The bill amends laws about reciprocal insurance contracts, stating that contracts between subscribers and their attorney in fact are not related party transactions. This aims to provide clarity in how these agreements are treated under the law.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 1385 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 1385.
You're tracking S 1385
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 1385 — Provides that contracts between subscribers and attorney in fact are not related party transactions.
Last action — REF SBA
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
This bill clarifies that certain contracts are not considered related party transactions.
The bill amends laws about reciprocal insurance contracts, stating that contracts between subscribers and their attorney in fact are not related party transactions. This aims to provide clarity in how these agreements are treated under the law.
Summary
Insurance/interinsurance contracts-concerns between subscribers and attorney
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current html December 30, 2025
Action History
-
REF SBA
-
REP 2RS
-
INT 1RS REF SCM
Sponsors
- Joseph A. Lagana · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Lagana, Joseph A. Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (119)
119 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 119 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cryan, Joseph P. | Democrat | Yea |
| Johnson, Gordon M. | Democrat | Yea |
| Lagana, Joseph A. | Democrat | Yea |
| Bramnick, Jon M. | Republican | Yea |
| Singer, Robert W. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 1385 do?
- Insurance/interinsurance contracts-concerns between subscribers and attorney
- Who sponsors S 1385?
- S 1385 is sponsored by Lagana, Joseph A. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 1385?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 1385?
- Track S 1385 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 1385
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 1385
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →