S 587 — Creates neutral safe exchange zones at county sheriff offices for certain custody and parenting time exchanges of minor children; makes appropriation.*
Last action — REF SBA
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
2 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
Establishes safe zones at sheriff offices for child custody exchanges.
The bill creates designated neutral safe exchange zones at county sheriff offices for parents to securely transfer minor children for custody and visitation. This aims to ensure the safety and well-being of children during such exchanges.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families can have a designated, safe place for child custody exchanges.
Summary
Child custody and visitation exchanges-create neutral safe exchange zones
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
43 added · 58 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment changes the terminology from "visitation" to "parenting time" throughout the bill and adds specific provisions regarding how exchanges of minor children are to be conducted. It clarifies that a court shall order the exchange to be at a neutral safe exchange zone or a designated court site upon request. Additionally, it removes prior references related to the necessity of a history of domestic violence for court-ordered exchanges, indicating a broader application for any party requesting such an order. This change matters because it potentially simplifies the process for parents seeking safe locations for child exchanges, without the previous requirement of proving a history of domestic violence.
S587 1R [First Reprint] SENATE, No.
Senator McKnight SYNOPSIS Creates neutral safe exchange zones at county sheriff offices for certain custody and visitationparenting time exchanges of minor children;
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT IntroducedAs Pendingreported Technicalby Reviewthe bySenate LegislativeLaw Counsel.and Public Safety Committee on June 11, 2026, with amendments.
An Act concerning child custody and visitation1[visitation] parenting time1 exchanges, supplementing Title 9 of the Revised Statutes and Title 40A of the New Jersey Statutes, and making an appropriation. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
At1[At] Upon1 the request of a party who1[who hashas] to1 an order for visitation1[visitation] parenting time1 or custody that1[that] which1 provides for the exchange of a minor child, 1the court shall order that1 the exchange shall1[shall] of the minor child1 be conducted at a neutral safe exchange zone,zone 1[,]1 established pursuant to section 2 of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) or at an exchange site designated by the court.
b. If1[If] When a motion to enforce compliance with a parenting time or custody order is filed, the court may order that the exchange of a minor child be conducted at an exchange site designated by the court upon request of a party to the order if1 there has been a history of domestic violence between the parties or if there is a temporary or final restraining order issued pursuant to the “Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991,” P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-17 et seq.),seq.)1[, and at the request of a party to enforce compliance with a visitation or custody order, the court may order an exchange of the minor child at a court approved site.site]1.
Each county sheriff shall designate at least one parking lot at the sheriff’s office, or a substation thereof, as a neutral safe exchange zone at which parents who are required to exchange a minor child pursuant to a parenting time-sharing1[time-sharing schedule or childchild] time or1 custody or1[or visitationvisitation]1 order may meet to exchange the minor child.
of this section, shall have the capability to record the neutral safe exchange zone during both 1the1 day and night, capture and record images clearly, and accurately display the time and date.
The county sheriff shall retain the video surveillance recordings or images for at least 45 days.
d. Nothing contained in this act shall hold a county, sheriff, law enforcement officer, or employee thereof,thereof 1[,]1 liable for civil damages for any act or omission relating to an incident arising from a meeting to exchange a minor child at a neutral safe exchange zone.
4.
STATEMENT This bill requires each county sheriff to designate at least one parking lot at the sheriff’s office, or a substation thereof, as a neutral safe exchange zone at which parents may meet to exchange a minor child for the purpose of visitation or custody. Under the bill, each neutral safe exchange zone is required to:
(1) have a sign on the premises to clearly identify the designated area as a neutral safe exchange zone;
(2) be accessible 24 hours a day, seven days a week;
(3) provide adequate lighting;
and (4) maintain an external video surveillance system that records continuously, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
The surveillance system is required to have the capability to record the neutral safe exchange zone during both day and night, capture and record images clearly, and accurately display the time and date.
The county sheriff is required to retain the video surveillance recordings or images for at least 45 days. However, nothing contained in the bill holds a county, sheriff, law enforcement officer, or employee thereof, liable for civil damages for any act or omission relating to an incident arising from a meeting to exchange a minor child at a neutral safe exchange zone.
Under the bill, the court may order an exchange of the minor child at a court approved site at the request of a party to enforce compliance with a visitation or custody order if there has been a history of domestic violence between the parties or if there is a temporary or final restraining order issued pursuant to the “Prevention of Domestic Violence Act of 1991.” Finally, the bill makes a General Fund appropriation to each county sheriff’s office in this State to fund the creation of the neutral safe exchange zones.
Action History
-
REF SBA
-
REP/SCA 2RS
-
INT 1RS REF SLP
Sponsors
- Angela V. McKnight · Cosponsor
- Paul D. Moriarty · Primary
- James Beach · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Moriarty, Paul D. Democrat
- Beach, James Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- McKnight, Angela V. Democrat
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greenstein, Linda R. | Democrat | Yea |
| McKnight, Angela V. | Democrat | Yea |
| Moriarty, Paul D. | Democrat | Yea |
| Henry, Owen | Republican | Not Voting |
| O'Scanlon Jr., Declan J. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 587 do?
- Child custody and visitation exchanges-create neutral safe exchange zones
- Who sponsors S 587?
- S 587 is sponsored by McKnight, Angela V. (Democrat), Moriarty, Paul D. (Democrat), and Beach, James (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 587?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 587?
- Track S 587 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 587
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 587
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →