New Jersey 222nd Legislature Status: Introduced 7 D cosponsors

S 451 — Establishes "Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act." *

Last action — SUB BY

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed General Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    2 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill makes it illegal to use algorithms that raise rental prices unlawfully.

This bill targets the use of algorithms in determining rental prices and supply of residential units, making it unlawful if it leads to inflation of rent. Its goal is to regulate how technology influences housing costs.

What this means for you
  • Workers: This can help workers by ensuring more stable housing costs without algorithmic manipulation.
  • Families: This aims to protect families from rising housing costs driven by unfair algorithmic practices.
  • Consumers: This means safeguards against unjust rent increases influenced by algorithms.

Summary

Algorithmic sym-use to influence price & supply, resid rental units unlawful

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

158 added · 46 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to the bill establishes the "Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act" and clarifies the findings related to residential rental pricing, noting that algorithmic systems have contributed to rising rental prices. It also modifies the definitions related to housing programs by removing specific references to programs and simplifying the language used. These changes aim to provide a clearer framework for understanding the impact of algorithmic pricing on rental prices and the scope of programs included in the bill.

→
Previous
Latest
S451 1R [First Reprint] SENATE, No.
S451 2R [Second Reprint] SENATE, No.
Senators McKnight, Mukherji, Wimberly, Cryan and McKeon         SYNOPSIS      Makes use of algorithmic systems to influence price and supply of residential rental units unlawful.
Senators McKnight, Mukherji, Wimberly, Cryan and McKeon         SYNOPSIS      Establishes “Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act.”   CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As amended by the Senate on June 18, 2026.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As reported by the Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee on March 5, 2026, with amendments.
   An Act concerning 2[pricing of] residential2 rental 2[properties] property pricing2 and supplementing P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.).
   An Act concerning pricing of rental properties and supplementing P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.).
       1.    The Legislature finds and declares that:
       21.   This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act.”2        2[1.] 2.2     The Legislature finds and declares that:
     c.     Recent national data indicates that landlords of residential rental housing use property management software to collude 1to restrain trade1 and raise residential rental housing prices, which may have contributed to recent increases in the State.
     c.     Recent national data indicates that landlords of residential rental housing use property management software to collude 1to restrain trade1 and raise residential rental housing prices, which 2[may have] has2 contributed to recent increases in the State.
     d.    Landlords engaging with the software supply real-time prices and additional lease information to companies managing the software, who proceed to use algorithms to fix rental prices.  As a result, competition decreases and typically rental prices increase.       e.     A leading property management software company in the United States hinted at the outcome of using its software by stating on its website that it enables landlords to “outperform the market” by 1[two to five] up to seven1 percent, with a company executive publicly stating that the software could be responsible for rent increases of up to 14.5 percent.
     d.    Landlords engaging with the software supply real-time prices and additional lease information to companies managing the software, who proceed to use algorithms to fix rental prices.  As a result, competition decreases and 2[typically]2 rental prices increase.       e.     A leading property management software company in the United States hinted at the outcome of using its software by stating on its website that it enables landlords to “outperform the market” by 1[two to five] up to seven1 percent, with a company executive publicly stating that the software could be responsible for rent increases of up to 14.5 percent.
     h.1  New Jersey recognizes housing as a basic human need and endeavors to expand access to affordable housing.         2.    As used in 1[this act] P.L.    , c.    (C.          ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill)1:
     h.1  New Jersey recognizes housing as a basic human need and endeavors to expand access to affordable housing.         2[2.] 3.2     As used in 1[this act] 2[P.L.    , c.    (C.          ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill)1] this act2:
the federal section 8 Housing Choice programs, authorized pursuant to Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
the federal section 8 Housing Choice 2[programs, authorized pursuant to Title 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations] Voucher Homeownership Program, authorized pursuant to Subpart M of Part 982 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations (24 CFR 982.601 et seq.)2;
or other local, State or federal government housing program.1      “Coordinating function” means:
or other local, State 2,2 or federal government housing program.1      2"Algorithmic device" means a device that uses one or more algorithms to process or otherwise perform calculations of data, including but not limited to, data concerning rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy levels.
     (1) collecting historical or contemporaneous prices, supply levels, or lease or rental contract termination and renewal dates of residential dwelling units from two or more rental property owners;
An algorithmic device does not include:
     (2) analyzing or processing of the information described in paragraph (1) of this definition through use of a system, software, 1algorithm,1 or 1other automated1 process that uses computation, including by using the information to train an algorithm;
(1) a spreadsheet that (a) operates without artificial intelligence and (b) requires human analysis to process or otherwise perform calculations of data;
and      (3) recommending rental prices, lease renewal terms, or ideal occupancy levels to a rental property owner.
or (2) a database that only uses an algorithm to query unprocessed data stored on or within that database.
     “Coordinator” means any person who operates a software or data analytics service that performs a coordinating function for any rental property owner, including a rental property owner performing a coordinating function for their own benefit.  1“Coordinator” shall not include a government entity that sets or limits rents or sale prices of residential property through affordability controls in accordance with law.1      “Person” means, unless the context otherwise requires, any natural person or persons, or any corporation, partnership, company, trust, or association of persons.
     “Competitively sensitive information” means nonpublic information including, but not limited to, prices, supply levels, security deposits, ideal occupancy levels, lease contract termination, renewal dates of residential dwelling units, or any other material lease terms.2      “Coordinating function” means:
     “Residential dwelling unit” means any house, apartment, accessory unit, or other unit intended to be used as a primary residence in the State.  “Residential dwelling unit” shall not include inpatient medical care, licensed long-term care, or detention or correctional facilities.
      (1) collecting 2[historical or contemporaneous prices, supply levels, or lease or rental contract termination and renewal dates of residential dwelling units from two or more rental property owners] the competitively sensitive information of two or more rental property owners for the purpose of analyzing or processing information through the use of an algorithm or other automated process, including by using the information to train an algorithm, where the algorithm or other automated process is used to set or recommend rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy levels2;
       3.    It shall be unlawful and a violation of the “New Jersey Antitrust Act,” P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.) for:
     (2) 2[analyzing or processing of the information described in paragraph (1) of this definition through use of a system, software, 1algorithm,1 or 1other automated1 process that uses computation, including by using the information to train an algorithm;
     a.     a rental property owner, or any agent, representative, or subcontractor thereof, to subscribe to, contract with, or otherwise exchange any form of consideration in return for the use of services of a coordinator;
and] setting rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy levels pursuant to an underlying algorithm or other automated process that analyzes or processes competitively sensitive information of any other rental property owner, including by using that competitively sensitive information to train an algorithm;
or      b.    a coordinator to facilitate an agreement among rental property owners that restricts competition with respect to residential dwelling units, including by performing a coordinating function.
or2      (3) 2[recommending rental prices, lease renewal terms, or ideal occupancy levels to a rental property owner] setting for or recommending to two or more rental property owners:
          4.    This act shall take effect on the first day of the fourth month next following the date of enactment.
rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy levels pursuant to the same or a substantially similar underlying algorithm or other automated process, that facilitates parallel pricing coordination.
     “Coordinating function” shall not include the following:
     (1)   providing, using, or collecting competitively sensitive information solely for the purpose of conducting research, statistical analysis, or testing, where the competitively sensitive information is not used in setting or recommending rental prices, material lease terms, fees, occupancy rates or levels, or other contract terms for current or future leases;
     (2)   developing an estimated amount of rent that is made available to the public at no cost;
     (3)   the use of a real estate brokerage database that is available on equal terms to subscribers that lists properties for rent or sale but does not:
     (a) set or recommend rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy rates or levels;
or      (b) collect competitively sensitive information to set or recommend rental prices, material lease terms, or occupancy rates or levels;
or      (4)   a government entity setting or limiting rents or sale prices of residential property through affordability controls in accordance with the law2.
     “Coordinator” means any person who operates 2[a software or data analytics service] algorithmic revenue management software or an algorithmic device2 that performs a coordinating function for any rental property owner, including a rental property owner performing a coordinating function for their own benefit.  1“Coordinator” shall not include a government entity that sets or limits rents or sale prices of residential property through affordability controls in accordance with law.1      2“Nonpublic information” means information that is not available to the public at no cost.
In instances where the information is combined with public information, all combined information shall be deemed nonpublic information.2      “Person” means, unless the context 2[otherwise]2 requires 2otherwise2, any natural person or persons, or any corporation, partnership, company, trust, or association of persons.
     2“Parallel pricing coordination” means a tacit or express agreement between two or more rental property owners to raise, change, maintain, or manipulate pricing for the leasing of reasonably interchangeable residential dwelling units, unless required to do so in accordance with affordability controls.
This includes agreements between a coordinator and multiple property owners.
     Rental property owner” means a person that owns, directly or indirectly, one or more rental residential dwelling units.  Any person that holds a controlling interest in an entity that owns a rental residential dwelling unit shall be deemed to constitute a single rental property owner with that entity.2      “Residential dwelling unit” means any house, apartment, accessory unit, or other unit intended to be used as a primary residence in the State.  “Residential dwelling unit” shall not include inpatient medical care, licensed long-term care, or detention or correctional facilities.
     2“Tacit agreement” means mutual consent demonstrated without verbal or written communication.  Mutual consent may, but need not, be demonstrated by a pattern of conduct.2        2[3.] 4.2     It shall be unlawful and a violation of the “New Jersey Antitrust Act,” P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.) for:
     a.     a rental property owner, or any agent, representative, or subcontractor thereof, to 2receive,2 subscribe to, contract 2[with] for2, or otherwise exchange any form of consideration in return for the use of 2, the2 services of a coordinator;
2[or]2      b.    a coordinator to facilitate 2[an] a tacit or express2 agreement among rental property owners that restricts competition with respect to residential dwelling units, including by performing a coordinating function 2;
     c.     two or more persons to engage in or otherwise facilitate parallel pricing coordination;
     d.    any agent or representative of a coordinator or subcontractor thereof to engage in parallel pricing coordination;
or      e.     any person to perform a coordinating function2.
       25.   The provisions of this act shall not be construed in any manner that limits the application of sections 6 through 17 of P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-6 through 9-17) to a violation of section 4 of this act.2        26.   a.  This act shall not authorize or permit any conduct already unlawful pursuant to the “New Jersey Antitrust Act,” P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.), or any other law, and shall be construed as in addition to that act.
     b.    A municipality shall be prohibited from enacting an ordinance that conflicts with this act.  This subsection shall not be construed to prohibit the enactment of ordinances explicitly authorized or required by any other law.2        27.   The Attorney General shall establish, on the official website of the Department of Law and Public Safety, a location to receive complaints alleging any violation or suspected violation of this act, which requirement may be satisfied by establishing or maintaining such a location for complaints alleging violations or suspected violations of the “New Jersey Antitrust Act” P.L.1970, c.73 (C.56:9-1 et seq.).2        28.   The Attorney General may, pursuant to the “Administrative Procedure Act,” P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), adopt any rules and regulations to effectuate the purposes of this act.2        2[4.] 9.2     This act shall take effect on the first day of the 2[fourth] twelfth2 month next following the date of enactment.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. SUB BY

  2. SA 2RS

  3. REP/SCA 2RS

  4. INT 1RS REF SCU

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (113)

113 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 113 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 451 do?
Algorithmic sym-use to influence price & supply, resid rental units unlawful
Who sponsors S 451?
S 451 is sponsored by McKeon, John F. (Democrat), Cryan, Joseph P. (Democrat), Wimberly, Benjie E. (Democrat), Mukherji, Raj (Democrat), McKnight, Angela V. (Democrat), Ruiz, M. Teresa (Democrat), and Stack, Brian P. (Democrat).
What is the current status of S 451?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track S 451?
Track S 451 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 451

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S 451

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →