Establishes guidelines for creditworthiness determinations concerning affordable housing programs.
This means families seeking affordable housing may have clearer criteria for credit evaluations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 219 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 219.
You're tracking S 219
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 219 — Establishes guidelines for creditworthiness determinations concerning affordable housing programs.
Last action — R/A REF AHO
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed General Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
7 sponsors
2 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill establishes guidelines for assessing creditworthiness in affordable housing programs.
This legislation sets forth guidelines for determining creditworthiness related to affordable housing. The aim is to create a standardized approach to help facilitate access to these housing programs.
What this means for you
- Families: This means families seeking affordable housing may have clearer criteria for credit evaluations.
Summary
Affordable housing programs-estab guidelines for creditworthiness determinations
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
40 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of the bill includes new text that allows for consideration of significant or extraordinary circumstances affecting a household's income or expenses when evaluating applications for affordable housing. Additionally, it specifies that proof of health insurance is required for all other members of the applicant household. These changes clarify what factors can be taken into account during the application process, potentially making it easier for certain households to qualify for affordable housing.
S219 1R2R [First[Second Reprint] SENATE, No.
Senators Burgess, Stack, CryanCryan, McKnight and McKnightRuiz SYNOPSIS Establishes guidelines for creditworthiness determinations concerning affordable housing programs.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT As reportedamended by the Senate Community and Urban Affairs Committee on March 5,23, 2026,2026. with amendments.
a. a. The current shortage of affordable housing in this State has forced many low and moderate income New Jersey residents to live in market rate housing they cannot afford but must occupy rather than face homelessness. b. After paying rent, these struggling families and individuals are frequently left with less money than needed to meet other basic household obligations. Late or partial payments, as well as missed payments made up in subsequent months, are often the result.
c. c. These undesirable but unavoidable decisions negatively affect many households’ credit reports and inevitably lead to lower-credit scores for these New Jersey residents. d. Access to housing with affordable rents would remedy a major cause of the financial difficulties experienced by lower-income persons, leave them with more income to meet their basic expenses, and help them to restore their credit standing.
e. e. Those households fortunate enough to obtain tenant-based housing subsidies, or access to cost-controlled housing units, generally after years spent on waiting lists, are often rejected by landlords based upon inadequate credit assessments.
1proof2[1proof of1 healthhealth]2 1[history] insurance2[insurance coverage1, includingincluding]2 1[any] proof2[proof of1 healthhealth]2 1[issues affecting] insurance2[insurance coverage for all1 other members of the applicant household;household;]2 the need for a reasonable accommodation in the case of a household which includes a person with a disability;
2any significant or extraordinary circumstances that have affected the needhousehold’s forincome aor reasonableexpenses, accommodationincluding, inbut not limited to, emergencies or other factors that have significantly affected the casehousehold’s ofability ato householdmeet its financial obligations;2 and the extent to which includesthe household developed a personbudget withor apayment disability;plan that enabled it to meet most of its expenses most of the time, keeping payments of expenses as close to current as was reasonably possible, and considering the occurrence of unanticipated problems, and emergencies or other factors that significantly affected the household's ability to adhere to any such budget.
and the extent to which the household developed a budget or payment plan that enabled it to meet most of its expenses most of the time, keeping payments of expenses as close to current as was reasonably possible, and considering the occurrence of unanticipated problems, and emergencies or other factors that significantly affected the household's ability to adhere to any such budget.
c. c. Notwithstanding any provision of subsection a.
a. a. the number of applications for affordable housing reviewed over the preceding 12-month reporting period;
c. c. the number of denials to which the affordable housing applicant filed a complaint in Superior Court;
and e. e. the information required under subsections a.
of section 11 of P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-12), it shall constitute unlawful discrimination for a landlord to use a credit or other risk score or assessment, calculated or disseminated by any entity in any manner, to evaluate the creditworthiness of an affordable housing applicant in a way that violates the provisions of P.L.,P.L. , c. (C. ) ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill).
b. A person claiming to be aggrieved pursuant to P.L., c. (C. ) (pendingP.L., c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) may file a complaint or action with the Division on Civil Rights in the Department of Law and Public Safety, or in the Superior Court of New Jersey, alleging a violation of the “Law Against Discrimination,” P.L.1945, c.169 (C.10:5-1 et seq.).
c. Following the receipt of a complaint the Director of the Division on Civil Rights in the Department of Law and Public Safety shall be authorized to prohibit the landlord from renting out the housing unit that the claimant applied for, pending the investigation of the claim. 9. 2d. The Attorneyprovisions General, in accordance with the “Administrative Procedure Act,” P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), and in consultation with the Commissioner of CommunityP.L., Affairs, shall adopt rules and regulations to effectuate P.L. , c. (C. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) onshall ornot beforebe theconstrued effectiveto dateimpose ofa P.L. duty ,on c. a (C. person )licensed (pending before the Legislature as this bill). The rules and regulations adopted by the AttorneyNew GeneralJersey mayReal restrictEstate theCommission applicationpursuant of the provisions of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), if necessary to complyR.S.45:15-1 withet federalseq. law.
during a transaction for which the licensee is not the landlord.2 9. The Attorney General, in accordance with the “Administrative Procedure Act,” P.L.1968, c.410 (C.52:14B-1 et seq.), and in consultation with the Commissioner of Community Affairs, shall adopt rules and regulations to effectuate P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill) on or before the effective date of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill). The rules and regulations adopted by the Attorney General may restrict the application of the provisions of P.L. , c. (C. ) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), if necessary to comply with federal law.
Action History
-
R/A REF AHO
-
PS
-
SA 2RS
-
REP/SCA 2RS
-
INT 1RS REF SCU
Sponsors
- M. Teresa Ruiz · Cosponsor
- Angela V. McKnight · Cosponsor
- Joseph P. Cryan · Cosponsor
- Brian P. Stack · Cosponsor
- Renee C. Burgess · Cosponsor
- Benjie E. Wimberly · Primary
- Shirley K. Turner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 113 not signed on · 13 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Wimberly, Benjie E. Democrat
- Turner, Shirley K. Democrat
Co-sponsors (5)
- Ruiz, M. Teresa Democrat
- McKnight, Angela V. Democrat
- Cryan, Joseph P. Democrat
- Stack, Brian P. Democrat
- Burgess, Renee C. Democrat
Not signed on (113)
113 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 113 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 0 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 23 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 33% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Singleton, Troy | Democrat | Yea |
| Stack, Brian P. | Democrat | Yea |
| Wimberly, Benjie E. | Democrat | Yea |
| Amato Jr., Carmen F. | Republican | Nay |
| Schepisi, Holly T. | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 219 do?
- Affordable housing programs-estab guidelines for creditworthiness determinations
- Who sponsors S 219?
- S 219 is sponsored by Ruiz, M. Teresa (Democrat), McKnight, Angela V. (Democrat), Cryan, Joseph P. (Democrat), Stack, Brian P. (Democrat), Burgess, Renee C. (Democrat), Wimberly, Benjie E. (Democrat), and Turner, Shirley K. (Democrat).
- What is the current status of S 219?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 219?
- Track S 219 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 219
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 219
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →