North Dakota 69-2025 Assembly Status: In Committee 3 R cosponsors

SB 2383 — Relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14‑09‑00.1, 14‑09‑06.2, and 14‑09‑07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.

Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 12 nays 35

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 10% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).

  • Failed a recorded vote

    Failed 1 recorded vote so far — a real headwind.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

A BILL for an Act to create and enact four new sections to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14-09-00.1, 14-09-06.2, and 14-09-07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

184 added · 258 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Senate Bill 2383 adds a definition of "equal parenting time," clarifying that it means each parent should ideally have their child for fifty percent of the time, or as close to that as possible, depending on individual family circumstances. This change emphasizes a balanced approach to parenting after separation or divorce, which can help ensure that children maintain strong relationships with both parents. The overall intent of these amendments is to foster a healthier co-parenting environment and support the well-being of children involved in custody arrangements.

→
Previous
Latest
25.0774.02001 Prepared by the Legislative Council Title.03000 staff for Senator Cory February 12, 2025 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SENATE BILL NO.
25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
Page No.
3.
1 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 3.
4.
Page No.
1 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 4.
In any proceeding addressing parental rights and responsibilities, there is a presumption that each parent is fit to care for a child and make decisions about the Page No.
In any proceeding addressing parental rights and responsibilities, there is a presumption that each parent is fit to care for a child and make decisions about the child's care, including making joint decisions with the other parent.
2 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly child's care, including making joint decisions with the other parent.
The court may not apply the best interests and welfare of the child factors under section 14-09-06.2 Page No.
The court may not apply the best interests and welfare of the child factors under section 14-09-06.2 unless a party establishes by clear and convincing evidence the presumption is properly rebutted in accordance with subsection 2that a parent is unfit to care for a child.
2 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly unless a party establishes by clear and convincing evidence that a parent is unfit to care for a child.
2.
As determined by the court, the presumption of fitness may be rebutted:
a.
If a parent has voluntarily chosen to have minimal or no relationship with the child for a period of at least one year after the birth of the child.
b.
If a parent or a parent's immediate family member has interfered with the other parent's ability to establish a relationship with the child, including by refusing to provide the other parent with opportunities to exercise care, residential responsibility, or control, even if a parenting time order has never been entered.
c.
If there exists a history of persistent and unwarranted interference by a parent with the other parent's parenting time, or a history of alienating a child from the other parent, even if a parenting time order has never been entered.
d.
If there exists one incident of domestic violence, as defined in section 14-07.1-01, which resulted in serious bodily injury or involved the use of a dangerous weapon, and the parent who committed the domestic violence was convicted of the crime due to the incident.
A domestic violence protection order that has been issued by a court or magistrate may not be considered by the court as evidence of domestic violence.
e.
If a parent has neglected or abused the child within a reasonable time proximate to the action.
For purposes of this section, "neglected or abused" means a parent:
(1) Abandons, tortures, chronically abuses, or sexually abuses a child;
(2) Fails to make substantial, meaningful efforts to secure treatment for the parent's addiction, mental illness, behavior disorder, or any combination of those conditions for a period of at least one year after the parent has been diagnosed with the condition, and notified by a licensed practitioner the parent is in need of treatment to protect the child from being physically or emotionally harmed;
Page No.
3 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (3) Engages in conduct prohibited under sections 12.1-20-01 through 12.1-20-08 or chapter 12.1-27.2, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim;
(4) Violates sections 12.1-16-01 through 12.1-16-03 or 14-09-22, in which the victim is another child of the parent;
(5) Engages in aiding, abetting, attempting, conspiring, or soliciting in violation of section 12.1-16-01 through 12.1-16-03, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim;
(6) Violates section 12.1-17-02, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim and has suffered serious bodily injury;
(7) Commits an offense under the laws of another jurisdiction which require proof of substantially similar elements as the violations described in subparagraphs d through f;
or (8) Allows the child to be the victim of human trafficking as defined in section 12.1-41-01.
f.
If a parent engages or attempts to engage in conduct, prohibited under sections 12.1-1701 through 12.1-17-04, in which the child at issue in the action is the victim.
g.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, exposes a child to chronic or severe alcohol use or use of any controlled substance as defined in section 19-03.1-01, in a manner not lawfully prescribed by a licensed practitioner.
h.
If a parent allows the child to be in an environment in which the child is exposed to a controlled substance or drug paraphernalia.
i.
If a parent allows a child to be without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care necessary for the child's physical, mental, or emotional health, and the deprivation is not due to the lack of financial means of the parent.
j.
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Previous
Latest
If a parent places the child up for adoption in violation of the law.
k.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, leaves the child without proper parental care or education as required by law, due to the physical, mental, emotional, or other illness or disability of the parent.
Page No.
4 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly l.
If a parent, within a reasonable time proximate to the proceeding, refused to participate in treatment for a child in need of treatment, as ordered by a juvenile court.
m.
If a parent has been diagnosed with having a physical injury or psychological condition, as certified by a licensed practitioner, which renders the parent unfit to provide proper care, custody, or control over the child.
Unless the presumption of fitness is properly rebuttedcourt determines a parent is unfit to care for a child in accordance with section 3 of this Act, or subsection 2, 4, 5, or 56 is applicable, making an award of equal residential responsibility inappropriate, a court must grant the parents equal residential responsibility of a child.
Unless the court determines a parent is unfit to care for a child in accordance with section 3 of this Act, or subsection 2, 4, 5, or 6 is applicable, making an award of equal residential responsibility inappropriate, a court must grant the parents equal residential responsibility of a child.
If the court determines the parents reside more than fifty miles apart andparents' residences are separated by a distance that would make an award of equal residential responsibility would be detrimental to the physical or emotional health of a child, and neither parent is willing to relocate to be closer to the other parent, the court must grant the maximum amount of parenting time possible to the parent who is not awarded primary residential responsibility of the child, which must be at least one hundred days per year.
If the court determines the parents' residences are separated by a distance that would make an award of equal residential responsibility detrimental to the physical or emotional health of a child, and neither parent is willing to relocate to be closer to the other parent, the court must grant the maximum amount of parenting time possible to the parent who is not awarded primary residential responsibility of the child.
If a parent is on active military duty or is inherently unable to execute the full allotted parenting time awarded, the court must order the missed parenting time be Page No.
If a parent is on active military duty or is inherently unable to execute the full allotted parenting time awarded, the court must order the missed parenting time be compensated to the maximum extent possible, including on each extended school break, if applicable.
5 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly compensated to the maximum extent possible, including on each extended school break, if applicable.
5.
Page No.
3 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 5.
These factors may not be considered unless the presumption of fitness is properly rebuttedcourt determines a parent is unfit to care for a child under section 3 of this Act or the court determines an award of equal residential responsibility is inappropriate under section 5 of this Act.
These factors may not be considered unless the court determines a parent is unfit to care for a child under section 3 of this Act or the court determines an award of equal residential responsibility is inappropriate under section 5 of this Act.
Page No.
c.
6 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly c.
g.
Page No.
4 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly g.
If necessary to protect the welfare of the child, residential responsibility for a child may be awarded to a suitable third person, provided that the person would not allow access to a violent parent except as ordered by the Page No.
If necessary to protect the welfare of the child, residential responsibility for a child may be awarded to a suitable third person, provided that the person would not allow access to a violent parent except as ordered by the court.
7 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly court.
if there exists one incident of domestic violence, as defined in section 14-07.1-01, which resulted in serious bodily injury or involved the use of a dangerous weapon, and the parent who committed the domestic violence was convicted of the crime due to the incident.
Page No.
k.j.
5 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly k.j.
If the court finds false allegations not made in good faith of harm to a child were made by one parent against the other, the court shall consider whether the parent's actions are punishable under chapter 27-10.
Page No.
SECTION 7.
8 25.0774.02001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly SECTION 7.
A parent with equal residential responsibility for a child may not change the residence of the child to another stateoutside of a fifty mile radius except with the written consent of the other parent or order of the court allowing the move and awarding that parent primary residential responsibility.
A parent with equal residential responsibility for a child may not change the residence of the child to another stateoutside of a fifty mile radius except with the written consent Page No.
6 25.0774.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of the other parent or order of the court allowing the move and awarding that parent primary residential responsibility.
9 25.0774.02001
7 25.0774.03000
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 12 nays 35

  2. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  3. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 2 0

  4. Committee Hearing 02:30

  5. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 34 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage

Failed 12 Yea · 35 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 122900
Democratic 0500
Unaffiliated 0100
Total 123500
% of votes cast 26%74%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Nay
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Nay
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Nay
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Nay
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Nay
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Nay
Clemens, David A. Republican Nay
Conley, Cole Republican Nay
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Nay
Dwyer, Michael Republican Nay
Enget, Mark Republican Nay
Erbele, Robert Republican Nay
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Nay
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Nay
Klein, Jerry Republican Nay
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Nay
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Nay
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Nay
Patten, Dale Republican Nay
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Nay
Schaible, Donald Republican Nay
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Nay
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Nay
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Nay
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Nay
Weber, Mark F. Republican Nay
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2383 do?
A BILL for an Act to create and enact four new sections to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to parental rights and responsibilities, equal residential responsibility, and the presumption of fitness; to amend and reenact sections 14-09-00.1, 14-09-06.2, and 14-09-07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the definition of equal decisionmaking responsibility and equal parenting time, the best interests of the child factors, and the residence of a child; and to provide for application.
Who sponsors SB 2383?
SB 2383 is sponsored by Cory, Claire (Republican), Luick, Larry (Republican), Paulson, Bob (Republican), and Rep. Vetter, Steve.
What is the current status of SB 2383?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 2383?
Track SB 2383 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2383

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2383

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →