Relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 2382 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 2382.
You're tracking SB 2382
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 2382 — Relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.
Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 03/31
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on March 31, 2025.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
AN ACT to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
79 added · 146 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to Senate Bill No. 2382 involve adding a declaration of emergency and clarifying the definitions related to "vexatious litigation." Specifically, the bill introduces a new chapter that outlines what constitutes vexatious conduct, including actions that harass others or unduly burden the judicial system. This matters because it aims to protect the judicial process from misuse by individuals who may bring frivolous lawsuits, promoting more efficient legal proceedings in North Dakota.
25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRSTIn ENGROSSMENTRegular ENGROSSEDSession Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 SENATE BILL NO.
2382 Introduced(Senators by Senators Sickler, HogueHogue) Representative(Representative LeforLefor) AAN BILLACT for an Act to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation;
and to providedeclare aan penalty.emergency.
Pagea. No.
1 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly a.
or d.S.
B.
NO.
2382 - PAGE 2 d.
ProcedureBurden of proof - VexatiousEntry litigant.of order restricting vexatious litigation.
AIf presidingthe judgecourt mayfinds designateby a vexatiouspreponderance litigantof uponthe motionevidence byan individual is a vexatious litigant, the court orshall atenter a prefiling order restricting the requestvexatious litigant from filing new litigation or filing documents within existing litigation without prior approval of athe party.court.
IfA the presiding judge finds there is a basis to conclude an individual is a vexatious litigant and determines a prefiling order shouldmust: be issued, the presiding judge shall issue a proposed prefiling order and proposed findings in support of the order.
3.
An individual determined by the presiding judge to be a vexatious litigant has fourteen days to file a written response to the proposed order.
4.
If a response is filed, the presiding judge may grant a hearing on the proposed order.
If no response is filed within fourteen days, or if the presiding judge concludes, following a response or any subsequent hearings, and there is a basis for issuing the order, the presiding judge may issue the prefiling order.
Prefiling order - Contents - Penalty.
1.
The prefiling order may:
ProhibitImpose theall vexatiouscosts litigant from filing any new litigation or any new documents in existing litigation in this state without first obtaining leave of a judge of the courtvexatious where the litigation isagainst proposedthe tofiling beparty; filed.
Pageand No.b.
2Award 25.0666.02000the Sixty-ninthopposing Legislativeparty Assemblyreasonable b.attorney fees and costs associated with responding to the vexatious litigant, including the cost of seeking the prefiling order.
Require the vexatious litigant to furnish security to assure payment of the moving party's reasonable expenses, costs, and attorney fees incurred in a pending action.
c.
Require the vexatious litigant to take any other action reasonably necessary.
2.
A prefiling order must contain an exception to allow the subject of the order to file an application seeking leave to file.
3.
Failure to comply with the terms of a prefiling order may be punished as a contempt of court.
4.
If a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order files any new litigation without first obtaining the leave of the court, the court may summarily dismiss the action without notice.
Procedure - New litigation and subsequent filings.
1.
A vexatious litigant shall file an application for leave to file using the form approved by the state court administrator before filing new litigation or documents into existing litigation.
2.
A court may permit the filing of new litigation or documentation into existing litigation only if it appears the litigation or document has merit and has not been filed for the purpose of harassment or delay.
3.
If the court issues an order granting leave to file a new litigation or a document into existing litigation, a party's time to answer or respond will begin to run when the party is served with the order of the court and a copy of the new litigation or document.
4.
Show all 93 changed lines (53 more)
The clerk may not file any litigation presented by the vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first obtains an order permitting the filing.
If the clerk mistakenly files the litigation without the order, any party may file a notice stating the plaintiff or complaining party in a disciplinary proceeding is a vexatious litigant subject to a prefiling order.
The filing of the notice automatically stays the litigation.
The litigation must be dismissed or denied unless the plaintiff or complainant, within ten days of the filing of the notice, obtains an order permitting the litigation to proceed.
If a party is served with a new litigation but the action is not filed with the clerk, the party served is not required to respond to the new litigation unless the Page No.
3 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly vexatious litigant obtains an order allowing the litigation to be filed and files and serves the new litigation.
5.
Upon receiving an application for leave to file, or upon notice from any party named in the litigation, the court shall rule on the application before ruling on the merits of any proposed filing.
6.
The court may award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the party filing the notice under subsection 4.
7.
An order granting leave to file is not required for an application for indigent defense services.
Appeals.
1.
A prefiling order entered by a presiding judge designating an individual as a vexatious litigant may be appealed to the supreme court under section 28-27-02 and rule 4 of the North Dakota Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2.
A prefiling order entered by the supreme court is not appealable.
3.
An order denying the application for leave to file by a vexatious litigant is not appealable.
Supreme court order.
1.
The supreme court may, by motion of the court or of any party to an appeal, enter a prefiling order prohibiting a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in the courts of this state as a self-represented party without first obtaining leave of a judge of the court where the litigation is proposed to be filed.
2.
If the supreme court finds there is a basis to conclude an individual is a vexatious litigant and determines a prefiling order should be issued, the supreme court shall issue a proposed prefling order and proposed findings in support of the order.
3.
An individual determined by the supreme court to be a vexatious litigant has fourteen days to file a written response to the proposed order.
4.
If a response is filed, the supreme court may grant a hearing on the proposed order.
If no response is filed within fourteen days, or if the supreme court concludes, following a response or any subsequent hearing there is a basis for issuing the order, the supreme court may issue the prefiling order.
Page No.
4 25.0666.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly Electronic filing.
A self-represented party who has been declared a vexatious litigant may not file documents electronically and may not be provided a user identification and password to access the state court electronic filing system.
A self-represented vexatious litigant shall file all documents in paper format in compliance with all other rules of the court.
EffectPrefiling oforders prefilingin order.effect under supreme court rule before August 1, 2025, remain in effect.
ARules prefiling- orderAuthority. entered under this chapter supersedes any other order limiting or enjoining an individual's ability to file or serve papers or pleadings in any North Dakota state court litigation.
PageThe No.supreme court shall adopt rules to implement this chapter.
5SECTION 25.0666.020002.
EMERGENCY.
This Act is declared to be an emergency measure.
S.
B.
NO.
2382 - PAGE 3 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House ____________________________ ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the House This certifies that the within bill originated in the Senate of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as Senate Bill No.
2382 and that two-thirds of the members-elect of the Senate voted in favor of said law.
Vote:
Yeas 42 Nays 2 Absent 3 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Secretary of the Senate This certifies that two-thirds of the members-elect of the House of Representatives voted in favor of said law.
Vote:
Yeas 72 Nays 21 Absent 1 ____________________________ ____________________________ Speaker of the House Chief Clerk of the House Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
Show all 93 changed rows (53 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Enrolled Enrollment Current pdf
- Engrossed FIRST ENGROSSMENT pdf
- Prepared by the Legislative Council staff for Representative Klemin View text pdf
- Adopted by the Senate Judiciary Committee View text pdf
- Amended FIRST ENGROSSMENT with House Amendments pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Filed with Secretary Of State 03/31
-
Signed by Governor 03/28
-
Sent to Governor
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Second reading, passed, yeas 42 nays 2, Emergency clause carried
-
Concurred
-
Returned to Senate (12)
-
Emergency clause carried
-
Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 72 nays 21
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 7 6 1
-
Committee Hearing 02:46
-
Committee Hearing 10:00
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
-
Received from Senate
-
Second reading, passed, yeas 45 nays 0
-
Amendment adopted, placed on calendar
-
Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 6 0 1
-
Committee Hearing 10:00
-
Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Jonathan Sickler · Primary
- David Hogue · Cosponsor
- Mike Rep. Lefor · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 145 not signed on · 21 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Sickler, Jonathan Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Hogue, David Republican
- Rep. Lefor, Mike
Not signed on (145)
145 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 145 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 37 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 4% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| van Oosting | — | Nay |
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Yea |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Yea |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Yea |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Not Voting |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Yea |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Yea |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Yea |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Yea |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Yea |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Yea |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Yea |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Yea |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Not Voting |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Yea |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Yea |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Yea |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Yea |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Yea |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Yea |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Yea |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Nay |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Yea |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Yea |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Yea |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Yea |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Yea |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Yea |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Yea |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Not Voting |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 61 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 72 | 21 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 77% | 22% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (94)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Olson | — | Nay |
| Brown, Collette | Democratic | Yea |
| Conmy, Liz | Democratic | Yea |
| Davis, Jayme | Democratic | Yea |
| Dobervich, Gretchen | Democratic | Yea |
| Finley-DeVille, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Foss, Austin | Democratic | Yea |
| Hager, LaurieBeth | Democratic | Yea |
| Hanson, Karla Rose | Democratic | Yea |
| Ista, Zachary | Democratic | Yea |
| Mitskog, Alisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Schneider, Mary | Democratic | Yea |
| Anderson, Bert | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Karen A. | Republican | Yea |
| Bahl, Landon | Republican | Yea |
| Beltz, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Berg, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Bolinske, Macy | Republican | Yea |
| Bosch, Glenn | Republican | Yea |
| Brandenburg, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Brown, TJ | Republican | Nay |
| Christianson, Nels | Republican | Nay |
| Dockter, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Dressler, Ty | Republican | Nay |
| Fegley, Clayton | Republican | Yea |
| Fisher, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Frelich, Kathy | Republican | Yea |
| Grindberg, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Grueneich, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Hagert, Jared C. | Republican | Yea |
| Hatlestad, Patrick R. | Republican | Yea |
| Hauck, Dori | Republican | Nay |
| Headland, Craig | Republican | Yea |
| Heilman, Matthew | Republican | Nay |
| Heinert, Pat D. | Republican | Yea |
| Henderson, Donna | Republican | Nay |
| Hendrix, Jared | Republican | Nay |
| Holle, Dawson | Republican | Nay |
| Hoverson, Jeff | Republican | Nay |
| Johnson, Jorin | Republican | Yea |
| Johnston, Daniel | Republican | Nay |
| Jonas, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Karls, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Kasper, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Kempenich, Keith | Republican | Yea |
| Kiefert, Dwight | Republican | Not Voting |
| Klemin, Lawrence R. | Republican | Yea |
| Koppelman, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Lefor, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Longmuir, Donald W. | Republican | Yea |
| Louser, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Maki, Roger A. | Republican | Nay |
| Marschall, Andrew | Republican | Yea |
| Martinson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| McLeod, Carrie | Republican | Yea |
| Meier, Lisa | Republican | Yea |
| Monson, David | Republican | Yea |
| Morton, Desiree | Republican | Nay |
| Motschenbacher, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, Eric J. | Republican | Yea |
| Nathe, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Nehring, Dennis | Republican | Nay |
| Nelson, Jon O. | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Anna S. | Republican | Yea |
| O'Brien, Emily | Republican | Yea |
| Olson, Jeremy | Republican | Yea |
| Osowski, Doug | Republican | Nay |
| Ostlie, Mitch | Republican | Yea |
| Porter, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Pyle, Brandy L. | Republican | Yea |
| Richter, David | Republican | Yea |
| Rios, Nico | Republican | Nay |
| Rohr, Karen M. | Republican | Yea |
| Ruby, Dan | Republican | Yea |
| Ruby, Matthew | Republican | Yea |
| Sanford, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Satrom, Bernie | Republican | Yea |
| Schatz, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| Schauer, Austen | Republican | Yea |
| Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia | Republican | Yea |
| Steiner, Vicky | Republican | Yea |
| Stemen, Gregory | Republican | Yea |
| Swiontek, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Toman, Nathan | Republican | Yea |
| Tveit, Bill | Republican | Nay |
| VanWinkle, Lori | Republican | Nay |
| Vetter, Steve | Republican | Yea |
| Vigesaa, Don | Republican | Nay |
| Vollmer, Daniel R. | Republican | Yea |
| Wagner, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Warrey, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Weisz, Robin | Republican | Yea |
| Wolff, Christina | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 45 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (47)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| van Oosting | — | Yea |
| Boschee, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Braunberger, Ryan | Democratic | Yea |
| Hogan, Kathy | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcellais, Richard | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Mathern, Tim | Democratic | Yea |
| Axtman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Barta, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Beard, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| Bekkedahl, Brad | Republican | Yea |
| Boehm, Keith | Republican | Yea |
| Burckhard, Randy A. | Republican | Yea |
| Castaneda, Jose L. | Republican | Yea |
| Cleary, Sean | Republican | Yea |
| Clemens, David A. | Republican | Yea |
| Conley, Cole | Republican | Yea |
| Cory, Claire | Republican | Yea |
| Davison, Kyle | Republican | Yea |
| Dever, Dick | Republican | Yea |
| Dwyer, Michael | Republican | Yea |
| Enget, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Erbele, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Gerhardt, Justin | Republican | Yea |
| Hogue, David | Republican | Yea |
| Kessel, Greg | Republican | Yea |
| Klein, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Larson, Diane | Republican | Yea |
| Lee, Judy | Republican | Yea |
| Lemm, Randy D. | Republican | Yea |
| Luick, Larry | Republican | Yea |
| Magrum, Jeffery J. | Republican | Yea |
| Meyer, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Myrdal, Janne | Republican | Yea |
| Patten, Dale | Republican | Yea |
| Paulson, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Powers, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Roers, Kristin | Republican | Yea |
| Rummel, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Schaible, Donald | Republican | Yea |
| Sickler, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Sorvaag, Ronald | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas, Paul J. | Republican | Yea |
| Walen, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wanzek, Terry M. | Republican | Yea |
| Weber, Mark F. | Republican | Yea |
| Weston, Kent | Republican | Yea |
| Wobbema, Mike | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 2382 do?
- AN ACT to create and enact a new chapter to title 28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to vexatious litigation; and to declare an emergency.
- Who sponsors SB 2382?
- SB 2382 is sponsored by Sickler, Jonathan (Republican), Hogue, David (Republican), and Rep. Lefor, Mike.
- What is the current status of SB 2382?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 2382?
- Track SB 2382 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 2382
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 2382
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →