North Dakota 69-2025 Assembly Status: Enacted 4 R cosponsors

SB 2375 — Relating to joint negotiations by dental providers with dental insurers.

Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 04/22

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on April 23, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 82% · moderate confidence

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 43-28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to joint negotiations by dental providers with dental insurers.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

139 added · 156 removed

Plain-language change summary

The changes made to SB 2375 allow dental providers to engage in voluntary joint negotiations with dental insurers, focusing on non-fee-related matters. The amendment clarifies the registration process by requiring providers to notify the attorney general about their intent to negotiate, along with details about the negotiation topics, the participating providers, and the insurer’s market share. This change is significant because it empowers dental providers to collectively address issues that may affect their practices and patient care, potentially leading to better insurance arrangements and improved outcomes for patients in North Dakota.

→
Previous
Latest
25.1361.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota In Regular Session Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 SENATE BILL NO.
2375 Introduced by Senators Castaneda, Bekkedahl, Lee, Barta Representatives Vigesaa, Ostlie A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new section to chapter 43-28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to joint negotiations by dental providers with dental insurers;
2375 (Senators Castaneda, Bekkedahl, Lee, Barta) (Representatives Vigesaa, Ostlie) AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 43-28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to joint negotiations by dental providers with dental insurers.
to amend and reenact section 54-57-07 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to compensation for the provision of administrative law judges;
and to provide a penalty.
As authorized under this section, two or more dental providers practicing in the service area of a dental insurer may jointly negotiate with the dental insurer and engage in related joint activity regarding non-fee-related matters including:
As authorized under this section, a dental provider and a dental insurer may enter into voluntary non-fee-related joint negotiations.
Before commencing voluntary joint negotiations, a joint negotiation representative shall notify the attorney general of its intent to engage in voluntary joint negotiations.
The notice must be in writing and include:
The matters, including terms and conditions, to be negotiated;
b.
The identity and location of all dental providers participating in the voluntary joint negotiations;
c.
The identity, location, and market share of the dental insurer the dental providers seek to engage in voluntary joint negotiations;
d.
A statement explaining the circumstances create the need for voluntary joint negotiations and the benefits anticipated from the voluntary joint negotiations;
and e.
The joint negotiation representative's procedures to ensure compliance with this section.
2.
At the time of the filing with the attorney general, the joint negotiation representative shall provide a copy to the dental insurer of its notice and any other materials submitted to the attorney general.
The dental insurer may provide additional information to the attorney general regarding matters described in this section.
3.
The attorney general shall review the notice to determine whether the proposed voluntary joint negotiations comply with law and public policy, and shall, within ninety days, unless a thirty day extension is approved by the parties, notify the joint negotiation representative and the dental insurer whether voluntary joint negotiations are authorized under this section.
The attorney general, in determining whether voluntary joint negotiations are authorized, shall consider the following factors:
a.
The stated necessity and anticipated benefits of voluntary joint negotiations;
b.
The market and bargaining power of the parties;
c.
A party's ability to control or steer consumers, dictate terms of contracts, impose final or nonnegotiable terms, or dictate or limit products or services available or offered to consumers;
d.
The contract terms to be negotiated, and the contract terms' potential effect on the ability to provide quality care or medically appropriate care without delay and difficulty;
S.
B.
NO.
2375 - PAGE 2 e.
The risk of anticompetitive effects;
and f.
The potential effect on price, quality, choice, or access to products or services for consumers or others.
4.
The attorney general may request additional information from the parties at any point during the process or during the parties' negotiations.
5.
Show all 134 changed rows (94 more)
Previous
Latest
Upon a determination by the attorney general that voluntary joint negotiation is authorized under this section, and after a duly authorized officer of the dental insurer and all dental providers seeking voluntary joint negotiations have granted written consent, two or more dental providers practicing in the service area of the dental insurer may jointly engage in voluntary negotiations with the dental insurer regarding the following non-fee-related matters:
a.
Methods and timing of payments.
j.
Page No.
j.
1 25.1361.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly k.
k.
Mechanisms for resolving disputes between the dental insurer and dental providers.
Mechanisms for resolving disputes between the dental insurer and dental provider.
Inclusion or alteration of a contractual term or condition, unless the inclusion or alteration is otherwise required by federal or state law.
m.
6.
Dental benefits sold or administered by the dental insurer in which the dental provider is required to participate.
As used in this section, "fee-related matters" includes the amount of payment, the amount of discount, procedure codes or descriptions of services covered by payment, appropriate grouping of procedure codes, and any other matter directly relating to the amount of reimbursements paid to or revenue received by dental providers.
n.
7.
Formulation and application of reimbursement methodology.
o.
Inclusion or alteration of a contractual term or condition, except when the inclusion or alteration is otherwise required by federal or state law.
2.
As authorized under this section, upon a finding by the office of administrative hearings that a dental insurer has substantial market power in a service area and any of the terms or conditions of the contract with the dental insurer pose an actual or potential threat to the quality and availability of patient care among covered individuals, two or more independent dental providers may jointly negotiate with the dental insurer and engage in related joint activity relating to fees and fee-related matters, including the:
Amount of payment.
Upon a determination by the attorney general that voluntary joint negotiations are authorized under this section, dental providers may communicate with each other and a joint negotiation representative authorized to negotiate on behalf of the dental providers with the dental insurer concerning any contractual term or condition to be negotiated, subject to any limitations imposed by the attorney general.
As used in this section, a "joint negotiation representative" means a representative selected by two or more independent dental providers to engage in voluntary joint negotiations with a dental insurer on behalf of the dental providers.
Amount of discount.
c.
Procedure codes or descriptions of services covered by payment.
d.
Appropriate grouping of procedure codes.
3.
a.
The dental providers may communicate with each other and a joint negotiation representative authorized to negotiate on behalf of the dental providers with the dental insurer concerning any contractual term or condition to be negotiated.
For purposes of this section, a "joint negotiation representative" means a representative selected by two or more independent dental providers to engage in joint negotiations with a dental insurer on behalf of the dental providers.
b.
The joint negotiation representative is the only party authorized to negotiate with the dental insurer on behalf of the dental providers as a group.
c.
Page No.
8.
2 25.1361.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 4.
A person may not act as a joint negotiation representative without express permission from the office of the attorney general.
A person may not act as a joint negotiation representative without express permission from the office of administrative hearings.
S.
5.
B.
Upon the joint negotiation representative and dental insurer determining an agreement has been reached on contractual terms or conditions that will be the subject matter of the negotiations, the joint negotiation representative shall submit to the office of administrative hearings, for approval, a copy of the proposed contract between the dental providers and dental insurer.
NO.
2375 - PAGE 3 9.
Within thirty days of receipt of the proposed contract, the office of administrative hearings shall review the proposed contract and provide a determination.
Upon the joint negotiation representative and dental insurer determining a voluntary agreement has been reached on contractual terms or conditions that are the subject matter of the negotiations, the joint negotiation representative shall submit to the attorney general, for its determination, a copy of the proposed contract or agreed upon terms between the dental providers and the dental insurer.
If the office of administrative hearings disapproves the contract, the office of administrative hearings shall communicate to the joint negotiation representative any deficiencies and specific remedial measures for the deficiencies.
At the time of the submission to the attorney general, the joint negotiation representative shall provide a copy of the proposed materials submitted to the attorney general to the dental insurer, which may provide additional information to the attorney general regarding the matters in this section.
Upon approval of the proposed contract, the dental providers, through the joint negotiation representative, and the dental insurer may engage in negotiations.
Within ninety days of receipt of the proposed contract or agreed upon terms, the attorney general shall review the proposed contract or agreed upon terms and provide a determination.
The joint negotiation representative shall submit the negotiated contract to the office of administrative hearings for review.
The attorney general may consider the following factors in reviewing a proposed contract or term, a negotiated contract or term, and the plan of action for implementing a negotiated contract or term under this section:
6.
(1) Fairness of the contract and whether the contract terms are consistent with applicable laws and regulations;
A negotiated contract and any plan of action for implementing a negotiated contract must be approved by the office of administrative hearings before becoming effective.
(2) Details provided about the negotiation process;
Within thirty days of receipt of the negotiated contract, the office of administrative hearings shall review the proposed contract and provide a determination.
(3) The market and bargaining power of the parties;
If the office of administrative hearings disapproves the contract, the office of administrative hearings shall communicate to the joint negotiation representative any deficiencies and specific remedial measures for the deficiencies.
(4) The contract terms and the benefits achieved by the parties;
7.
(5) Potential benefit to consumers and other purchasers of dental insurance;
The office of administrative hearings shall adopt rules and procedures as necessary to carry out the responsibilities of this section.
(6) Risk of harm to consumers and others, including the likelihood of increase in prices or reduction in quality, choice, or access to dental care or dental insurance;
8.
(7) Risk of anticompetitive effects and potential effects on third parties, including creation of barriers to entry for new market participants, unfair competition, or exclusionary effects;
This section does not apply to dental benefit plans providing covered services exclusively or primarily to individuals who are eligible for medical assistance.
and (8) Promotion of increased infrastructure and innovation in a market.
9.
d.
Any negotiations under this section must be made in good faith.
Upon request from the attorney general, the joint negotiation representative, a participating dental provider, and the dental insurer shall provide additional information to inform the attorney general's determination under this section.
A person that does not negotiate in good faith may be subject to sanctions or penalties as determined by the office of administrative hearings.
This section may not be construed to:
The attorney general may adopt rules and procedures as necessary to carry out the responsibilities of this section.
Page No.
3 25.1361.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly a.
Permit a coordinated cessation reduction or limitation of dental services.
b.
Affect governmental approval of, or otherwise restrict activity by, dental providers which is not prohibited under federal antitrust law or require approval of contract terms to the extent the terms are exempt from state regulation under federal law.
The dental insurer is responsible for costs for services rendered by the office of administrative hearings and shall make payment for costs for services in accordance with section 54-57-07 and rules adopted by the office of administrative hearings.
This section does not apply to dental benefit plans providing covered services exclusively or primarily to individuals who are eligible for medical assistance.
SECTION 2.
12.
AMENDMENT.
This section may not be construed to:
Section 54-57-07 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
54-57-07.
Compensation for provision of administrative law judges - Special fund established - Continuing appropriation.
1.
The office of administrative hearings shall require payment for services rendered by any administrative law judge provided by it to anyan agency, to any unit of local government in this state, to any tribal government in this state, or to the judicial branch, or a nongovernmental entity, in the conduct of an administrative hearing and related proceedings, and proceedings under section 1 of this Act, and those entities must make the required payment to the office.
Payment must include payment for support staff necessary to render administrative law judge services.
Moneys received by the office of administrative hearings in payment for providing an administrative law judge to conduct an administrative hearing and related proceedings, and proceedings under section 1 of this Act, must be deposited into the operating fund of the office of administrative hearings.
2.
The office of administrative hearings shall require payment for mileage, meals, and lodging in connection with services rendered by an administrative law judge provided to anyan agency, to any unit of local government in this state, to any tribal government in this state, or to the judicial branch, or a nongovernmental entity, in the conduct of an administrative hearing and related proceedings, and proceedings under section 1 of this Act, and those entities must make the required payment to the office.
Payment for meals and lodging must be in the amounts allowable under section 44-08-04.
Payment for mileage when using state vehicles must be in amounts set for user charges under section 24-02-03.5.
All other payments must be in amounts allowed for other state Page No.
4 25.1361.02000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly officials and employees.
Either general fund or special fund moneys, or other income, may be used for the payment of mileage, meals, and lodging under this subsection.
3.
A special fund is established in the state treasury and designated as the administrative hearings fund.
The office of administrative hearings shall deposit in the fund all moneys received by it in payment for providing services rendered by any administrative law judge in the conduct of an administrative hearing and related proceedings, and proceedings under section 1 of this Act, under this chapter, as well as all moneys received by the office in payment for mileage, meals, and lodging in connection with providing any administrative law judge to conduct an administrative hearing and related proceedings, and proceedings under section 1 of this Act.
The moneys in the fund are a standing and continuing appropriation and are appropriated, as necessary, for the following purposes:
For the office of administrative hearings to pay for salaries, wages, benefits, operating expenses, and equipment, including payment to temporary administrative law judges, as necessary, for the purpose of providing requested administrative law judges to agenciesan agency, to any unit of local government in this state, to any tribal government in this state, or to the judicial branch, or a nongovernmental entity.
Permit a coordinated cessation, reduction, or limitation of dental services.
For the office of administrative hearings to pay mileage, meals, and lodging to any administrative law judges, as necessary, in connection with the services to be provided under this chapter.
Affect government approval of, or otherwise restrict activity by, dental providers which is not prohibited under federal antitrust law or require approval or contract terms to the extent the terms are exempt from state regulation under federal law.
Page No.
S.
5 25.1361.02000
B.
NO.
2375 - PAGE 4 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House ____________________________ ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the House This certifies that the within bill originated in the Senate of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as Senate Bill No.
2375.
Senate Vote:
Yeas 44 Nays 2 Absent 1 House Vote:
Yeas 78 Nays 14 Absent 2 ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 04/22

  2. Signed by Governor 04/21

  3. Sent to Governor

  4. Signed by President

  5. Signed by Speaker

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 44 nays 2

  7. Concurred

  8. Returned to Senate (12)

  9. Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 78 nays 14

  10. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  11. Reported back amended, do not pass, placed on calendar 8 5 1

  12. Committee Hearing 10:00

  13. Introduced, first reading, referred Industry, Business and Labor Committee

  14. Received from Senate

  15. Second reading, passed, yeas 36 nays 8

  16. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  17. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 0 1

  18. Committee Hearing 09:00

  19. Committee Hearing 09:30

  20. Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 142 not signed on · 23 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (5)

Not signed on (142)

142 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 142 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage

Passed 44 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 40001
Democratic 3200
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 44201
% of votes cast 94%4%0%2%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Yea
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Not Voting
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Yea
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Yea
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 78 Yea · 14 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 691201
Democratic 8201
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 781402
% of votes cast 83%15%0%2%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Olson — Yea
Brown, Collette Democratic Nay
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Not Voting
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Nay
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Nay
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Nay
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Nay
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Brown, TJ Republican Nay
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Not Voting
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Yea
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Nay
Lefor, Mike Republican Nay
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Yea
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Nay
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Nay
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Nay
Ruby, Matthew Republican Nay
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Nay
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Nay
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 36 Yea · 8 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 31703
Democratic 4100
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 36803
% of votes cast 77%17%0%6%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Yea
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Yea
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Not Voting
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Nay
Kessel, Greg Republican Nay
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Nay
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Not Voting
Patten, Dale Republican Nay
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Nay
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Not Voting
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

healthcare labor health-insurance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2375 do?
AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 43-28 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to joint negotiations by dental providers with dental insurers.
Who sponsors SB 2375?
SB 2375 is sponsored by Castaneda, Jose L. (Republican), Barta, Jeff (Republican), Bekkedahl, Brad (Republican), Lee, Judy (Republican), Rep. Ostlie, Mitch, and Rep. Vigesaa, Don.
What is the current status of SB 2375?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 27, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2375?
Track SB 2375 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2375

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 2375

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →