A 1728 — Prohibits public school from denying admittance to student due to tardiness or violation of dress code or school uniform policy.*
Last action — REP/ACA 2RA
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed General Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
School dress code or uniform policy-prohibit school dist from denying admittance
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 29 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment clarifies that public schools are authorized to implement uniform clothing requirements for students, focusing on enhancing the school's learning environment. Additionally, it states that students cannot be denied admittance for tardiness or violations of uniform or dress code policies, except for clothing associated with gang affiliation. This change specifies the conditions under which students can be admitted to school, ensuring that admission is not hindered by dress code infractions unless they are related to gang activity.
A1728 1R [First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No.
Assemblywomen Collazos-Gill and Brennan SYNOPSIS Prohibits schoolpublic districtschool from denying admittance to student due to tardiness or violation of dress code or school uniform policy.
CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT IntroducedAs Pendingreported Technicalby Reviewthe byAssembly LegislativeEducation Counsel.Committee on May 7, 2026, with amendments.
1. 11. Section 21 of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-8)(C.18A:11-7) is amended to read as follows:
2. 1. a. The ALegislature boardfinds ofand educationdeclares maythat adoptmany aeducators believe that school dress codecan policysignificantly toinfluence requirepupil behavior and that studentsschools wearthat ahave adopted dress codes, including dress codes which require school uniformuniforms ifand thewhich policyprohibit isclothing requestedindicating bymembership thein principal,certain staff,gangs, andexperience parentsgreater ofschool anpride individualand school,improved behavior in and ifout of the boardclassroom. determinesThe Legislature further finds that theto policyassist willin enhancecontrolling the schoolenvironment learningin environment. public Anyschools, policyto adoptedfacilitate whichand requiresmaintain an effective learning environment, and to keep the wearingfocus of athe uniformclassroom shallon includelearning, a[school provisiondistricts] public schools should be specifically authorized to assistimplement economicallyuniform disadvantagedclothing students.requirements for their students.1 (cf:
P.L.1996, c.93, s.1) 1[1.] 2.1 Section of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-8) is amended to read as follows:
2. a. A board of education 1of a school district or a board of trustees of a charter school or renaissance school project1 may adopt a dress code policy to require that students wear a school uniform if the policy is requested by the principal, staff, and parents of an individual school, and if the board determines that the policy will enhance the school learning environment. Any policy adopted which requires the wearing of a uniform shall include a provision to assist economically disadvantaged students.
b. The board of education 1or board of trustees1 may provide a method whereby parents may choose not to comply with an adopted school uniform policy. If the board provides a method, a student shall not be penalized academically or otherwise discriminated against [nor denied admittance to school] if the student's parents choose not to comply with the school uniform policy.
c. A dress code policy adopted pursuant to this section shall not preclude students who participate in a nationally recognized youth organization which is approved by the board of education 1or board of trustees1 from wearing organization uniforms to school on days that the organization has scheduled a meeting.
P.L.1996, c.93, s.2) 2. 13. (NewSection section) 3 a.of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-9) is amended to read as follows:
3. A board of education of a school district or board of trustees of a charter school or renaissance school project may adopt a dress code policy to prohibit students from wearing, while on school property, any type of clothing, apparel or accessory which indicates that the student has membership in, or affiliation with, any gang associated with criminal activities. The local law enforcement agency shall advise the board, upon its request, of gangs which are associated with criminal activities.1 (cf:
P.L.1996, c.93, s.3) 1[2.] 4.1 (New section) a.
(1) tardinesstardiness; ;
b. Nothing in this section shall be construed to restrict the ability to enforce any board of education 1or board of trustees1 adopted student code of conduct or policy that is outside the purview of this section.
3. 1[3.] 5.1 This act shall take effect immediately.
STATEMENT This bill provides that a student cannot be denied admittance to school due to:
1) tardiness;
or 2) a violation of a school uniform policy or dress code policy, except in the case of a student wearing clothing, apparel, or accessories indicating membership in, or affiliation with, any gang associated with criminal activities.
The amended bill clarifies that a board of education is not restricted from enforcing any adopted student code of conduct or policy that does not conflict with the provisions of the bill.
Action History
-
REP/ACA 2RA
-
INT 1RA REF AED
Sponsors
- Katie Brennan · Cosponsor
- Alixon Collazos-Gill · Cosponsor
- William W. Spearman · Primary
- Verlina Reynolds-Jackson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Spearman, William W. Democrat
- Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina Democrat
Co-sponsors (2)
- Brennan, Katie Democrat
- Collazos-Gill, Alixon Democrat
Not signed on (116)
116 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 116 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bagolie, Rosaura | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Brennan, Katie | Democrat | Yea |
| Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina | Democrat | Yea |
| Swain, Lisa | Democrat | Yea |
| Venezia, Michael | Democrat | Yea |
| Fantasia, Dawn | Republican | Not Voting |
| Simonsen, Erik K. | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does A 1728 do?
- School dress code or uniform policy-prohibit school dist from denying admittance
- Who sponsors A 1728?
- A 1728 is sponsored by Brennan, Katie (Democrat), Collazos-Gill, Alixon (Democrat), Spearman, William W. (Democrat), and Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina (Democrat).
- What is the current status of A 1728?
- This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track A 1728?
- Track A 1728 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on A 1728
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of A 1728
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →