New Jersey 222nd Legislature Status: Introduced 4 D cosponsors

A 1728 — Prohibits public school from denying admittance to student due to tardiness or violation of dress code or school uniform policy.*

Last action — REP/ACA 2RA

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed General Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Advancing 34% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

School dress code or uniform policy-prohibit school dist from denying admittance

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 29 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment clarifies that public schools are authorized to implement uniform clothing requirements for students, focusing on enhancing the school's learning environment. Additionally, it states that students cannot be denied admittance for tardiness or violations of uniform or dress code policies, except for clothing associated with gang affiliation. This change specifies the conditions under which students can be admitted to school, ensuring that admission is not hindered by dress code infractions unless they are related to gang activity.

→
Previous
Latest
A1728 ASSEMBLY, No.
A1728 1R [First Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No.
Assemblywomen Collazos-Gill and Brennan         SYNOPSIS      Prohibits school district from denying admittance to student due to tardiness or violation of dress code or school uniform policy.
Assemblywomen Collazos-Gill and Brennan         SYNOPSIS      Prohibits public school from denying admittance to student due to tardiness or violation of dress code or school uniform policy.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      Introduced Pending Technical Review by Legislative Counsel.
  CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT      As reported by the Assembly Education Committee on May 7, 2026, with amendments.
        1.   Section 2 of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-8) is amended to read as follows:
       11.  Section 1 of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-7) is amended to read as follows:
     2.    a.  A board of education may adopt a dress code policy to require that students wear a school uniform if the policy is requested by the principal, staff, and parents of an individual school, and if the board determines that the policy will enhance the school learning environment.  Any policy adopted which requires the wearing of a uniform shall include a provision to assist economically disadvantaged students.
     1.  The Legislature finds and declares that many educators believe that school dress can significantly influence pupil behavior and that schools that have adopted dress codes, including dress codes which require school uniforms and which prohibit clothing indicating membership in certain gangs, experience greater school pride and improved behavior in and out of the classroom.  The Legislature further finds that to assist in controlling the environment in public schools, to facilitate and maintain an effective learning environment, and to keep the focus of the classroom on learning, [school districts] public schools should be specifically authorized to implement uniform clothing requirements for their students.1 (cf:
P.L.1996, c.93, s.1)        1[1.] 2.1     Section of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-8) is amended to read as follows:
     2.    a.  A board of education 1of a school district or a board of trustees of a charter school or renaissance school project1 may adopt a dress code policy to require that students wear a school uniform if the policy is requested by the principal, staff, and parents of an individual school, and if the board determines that the policy will enhance the school learning environment.  Any policy adopted which requires the wearing of a uniform shall include a provision to assist economically disadvantaged students.
     b.    The board of education may provide a method whereby parents may choose not to comply with an adopted school uniform policy.  If the board provides a method, a student shall not be penalized academically or otherwise discriminated against [nor denied admittance to school] if the student's parents choose not to comply with the school uniform policy.
     b.    The board of education 1or board of trustees1 may provide a method whereby parents may choose not to comply with an adopted school uniform policy.  If the board provides a method, a student shall not be penalized academically or otherwise discriminated against [nor denied admittance to school] if the student's parents choose not to comply with the school uniform policy.
     c.     A dress code policy adopted pursuant to this section shall not preclude students who participate in a nationally recognized youth organization which is approved by the board of education from wearing organization uniforms to school on days that the organization has scheduled a meeting.
     c.     A dress code policy adopted pursuant to this section shall not preclude students who participate in a nationally recognized youth organization which is approved by the board of education 1or board of trustees1 from wearing organization uniforms to school on days that the organization has scheduled a meeting.
P.L.1996, c.93, s.2)        2.    (New section)  a.
P.L.1996, c.93, s.2)        13.  Section 3 of P.L.1996, c.93 (C.18A:11-9) is amended to read as follows:
     3.  A board of education of a school district or board of trustees of a charter school or renaissance school project may adopt a dress code policy to prohibit students from wearing, while on school property, any type of clothing, apparel or accessory which indicates that the student has membership in, or affiliation with, any gang associated with criminal activities.  The local law enforcement agency shall advise the board, upon its request, of gangs which are associated with criminal activities.1 (cf:
P.L.1996, c.93, s.3)        1[2.] 4.1     (New section)  a.
     (1) tardiness ;
     (1) tardiness;
     b.    Nothing in this section shall be construed to restrict the ability to enforce any board of education adopted student code of conduct or policy that is outside the purview of this section.
     b.    Nothing in this section shall be construed to restrict the ability to enforce any board of education 1or board of trustees1 adopted student code of conduct or policy that is outside the purview of this section.
       3.    This act shall take effect immediately.
         1[3.] 5.1     This act shall take effect immediately.
STATEMENT        This bill provides that a student cannot be denied admittance to school due to:
1) tardiness;
or 2) a violation of a school uniform policy or dress code policy, except in the case of a student wearing clothing, apparel, or accessories indicating membership in, or affiliation with, any gang associated with criminal activities.
     The amended bill clarifies that a board of education is not restricted from enforcing any adopted student code of conduct or policy that does not conflict with the provisions of the bill.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. REP/ACA 2RA

  2. INT 1RA REF AED

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 116 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (116)

116 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 116 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does A 1728 do?
School dress code or uniform policy-prohibit school dist from denying admittance
Who sponsors A 1728?
A 1728 is sponsored by Brennan, Katie (Democrat), Collazos-Gill, Alixon (Democrat), Spearman, William W. (Democrat), and Reynolds-Jackson, Verlina (Democrat).
What is the current status of A 1728?
This bill has been introduced in the General Assembly. Introduced January 13, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track A 1728?
Track A 1728 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on A 1728

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of A 1728

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →