Massachusetts 194th General Court Status: Introduced 1 D cosponsors

H1894 — An Act promoting equity in traffic stops

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

An Act promoting equity in traffic stops

Bill Text

  • Full text Current

How this bill changes current law

5 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill adds a new section that regulates the admissibility of evidence obtained during traffic stops.

  • Chapter 90, section 20H

    Section 20I. (a) Evidence obtained during a traffic stop shall be inadmissible in any criminal proceeding if the evidence is unrelated to the traffic violation that was the basis for the stop, unless the officer had reasonable suspicion or probable cause to believe that the operator or passenger of the vehicle was engaged in an act that constitutes a felony or a misdemeanor prior to initiating the stop.

    This establishes that evidence unrelated to the reason for the traffic stop is generally inadmissible unless certain conditions are met.

  • Chapter 90, section 20H

    (b) In any motion to suppress evidence under this section, the burden shall be on the commonwealth to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that reasonable suspicion or probable cause of criminal activity existed prior to the initiation of the traffic stop.

    This changes the burden of proof in suppression motions to require the Commonwealth to demonstrate reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

  • Chapter 90, section 20H

    (c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of law enforcement to enforce the traffic laws of the commonwealth. Law enforcement officers may issue citations, warnings, or make arrests for violations of traffic laws; provided, however, that such enforcement shall not serve as a pretext for investigating unrelated criminal activity.

    This clarifies that traffic law enforcement authority remains intact and prohibits using traffic stops as a means to investigate unrelated crimes.

  • Chapter 90, section 20H

    (d) (1) Any evidence obtained in violation of this section shall be suppressed and shall not be admissible in any criminal proceeding in the courts of the commonwealth.

    This mandates that any illegally obtained evidence under this section be suppressed in court.

  • Chapter 90, section 20H

    (d) (2) Any individual subjected to a traffic stop in violation of this section may pursue all civil remedies available under state or federal law, including but not limited to claims for injunctive relief or monetary damages.

    This grants individuals the right to seek legal remedies if their rights under this section are violated.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (203)

203 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 203 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does H1894 do?
An Act promoting equity in traffic stops
Who sponsors H1894?
H1894 is sponsored by Samantha Montaño (Democrat).
What is the current status of H1894?
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track H1894?
Track H1894 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on H1894

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of H1894

Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →