HB 226 — Expand intimidation offenses to guardians ad litem/advocates
Last action — As Passed by the House
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 134th General Assembly. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill expands intimidation offenses to include guardians ad litem and advocates.
This bill extends the definition of intimidation offenses to protect guardians ad litem and advocates. It aims to ensure these individuals can perform their roles without facing intimidation.
Summary
Expand intimidation offenses to guardians ad litem/advocates
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 226 on the official Ohio source →Action History
-
As Passed by the House
Sponsors
- Gail K. Pavliga · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 94 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (96)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adam C. Miller | — | Yea |
| Bill Seitz | — | Yea |
| David Leland | — | Yea |
| Sedrick Denson | — | Yea |
| Tavia Galonski | — | Yea |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Yea |
| Andrea White | Republican | Yea |
| Cindy Abrams | Republican | Yea |
| D. J. Swearingen | Republican | Yea |
| Jean Schmidt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff LaRe | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Plummer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 226 do?
- Expand intimidation offenses to guardians ad litem/advocates
- Who sponsors HB 226?
- HB 226 is sponsored by Gail K. Pavliga.
- What is the current status of HB 226?
- This bill died with 134th General Assembly. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 226?
- Track HB 226 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 226
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 226
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →