HB 109 — Increase penalties-certain criminal offenses; peace officer suits
Last action — As Passed by the House
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 134th General Assembly. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
The bill increases penalties for certain criminal offenses and addresses peace officer lawsuits.
This legislation raises penalties for specific criminal offenses and introduces provisions related to lawsuits involving peace officers. It aims to change how certain offenses are punished and how legal actions against officers are handled.
Summary
Increase penalties-certain criminal offenses; peace officer suits
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 109 on the official Ohio source →Action History
-
As Passed by the House
Sponsors
- Cindy Abrams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 133 not signed on · 35 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cindy Abrams Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (133)
133 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 133 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 32 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 37% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (95)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Adam C. Miller | — | Nay |
| Bill Seitz | — | Yea |
| David Leland | — | Nay |
| Sedrick Denson | — | Nay |
| Tavia Galonski | — | Nay |
| Willis E. Blackshear, Jr. | Democratic | Nay |
| Andrea White | Republican | Yea |
| Cindy Abrams | Republican | Yea |
| D. J. Swearingen | Republican | Yea |
| Jean Schmidt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff LaRe | Republican | Yea |
| Phil Plummer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 109 do?
- Increase penalties-certain criminal offenses; peace officer suits
- Who sponsors HB 109?
- HB 109 is sponsored by Cindy Abrams (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 109?
- This bill died with 134th General Assembly. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 109?
- Track HB 109 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 109
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 109
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →