North Dakota 69-2025 Assembly Status: Enacted 2 R cosponsors

SB 2186 — Relating to interference with court-ordered parenting time; to create a child custody review task force; to provide for a legislative management report; and to provide a penalty.

Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 04/23

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on April 23, 2025.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to interference with court-ordered parenting time; to create a child custody review task force; to provide for a legislative management report; and to provide a penalty.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

95 added · 43 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendments to SB 2186 introduce a new provision aimed at enhancing enforcement of court-ordered parenting time in North Dakota. If one parent intentionally interferes with another's court-ordered parenting time, the court can now grant the affected parent extra parenting time to compensate for what was lost, potentially doubling the lost time. This change is significant as it seeks to ensure that parents' rights to spend time with their children are respected and reinforced, promoting a more equitable enforcement of custody agreements. Additionally, a child custody review task force is being created to further evaluate and improve the handling of such cases.

→
Previous
Latest
25.0805.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED SENATE BILL NO.
Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota In Regular Session Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 SENATE BILL NO.
2186 Introduced by Senators Clemens, Luick Representatives Koppelman, Marschall A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 12.1-18-05 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the removal or withholding of a child in violation of a custody decree and false information or reports to law enforcement or the department of health and human services;
2186 (Senators Clemens, Luick) (Representatives Koppelman, Marschall) AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to interference with court-ordered parenting time;
to create a child custody review task force;
to provide for a legislative management report;
AMENDMENT.
A new section to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code is created and enacted as follows:
Section 12.1-18-05 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
Parenting time - Interference - Penalty.
12.1-18-05.
1.
Removal of child from state in violation of custody decree - False information or reports - Penalty.
Unless a party shows by clear and convincing evidence that additional parenting time should not be ordered, if the court finds one parent intentionally interfered with the other parent's court-ordered parenting time, the court shall order additional parenting time to the parent who lost parenting time due to the interference to indemnify that parent for any lost court-ordered parenting time.
Any person 1.
An individual who intentionally removes, causes the removal of, or detains the person'sindividual's own child under the age of eighteen years outside this state with the intent to deny another person'sindividual's rights in violation of an existinga custody decree is guilty of a class C felony.
Detaining the child outside this state in violation of the custody decree for more than seventy-two hours is prima facie evidence that the personindividual charged intended to violate the custody decree at the time of removal.
An individual who intentionally removes, causes the removal of, or detains the individual's own child under the age of eighteen years within this state with the intent to deny another individual's rights in violation of a custody decree is guilty of an infraction for a first and second offense, a class B misdemeanor for a third offense, and a class A misdemeanor for a fourth offense.
The additional parenting time:
Detaining the child within this state in Page No.
a.
1 25.0805.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly violation of the custody decree for more than seventy-two hours is prima facie evidence that the individual charged intended to violate the custody decree at the time of removal.
Must at least be of the same type and duration of parenting time lost due to the interference and may be up to double the period of time lost, as determined by the court.
b.
May include weekend, holiday, and summer parenting time.
c.
Must occur within two years of the date the court finds the parent intentionally interfered with the other parent's court-ordered parenting time.
An individual who gives false information or a false report alleging harm to a child by one parent against the other to a law enforcement officer or the department of health and human services which that individual knows to be false, is guilty of an infraction for a first and second offense, a class B misdemeanor for a third offense, and a class A misdemeanor for a fourth offense.
A court shall:
Page No.
a.
2 25.0805.03000
Give deference to the proposed additional parenting time schedule of the parent entitled to additional parenting time under subsection 1 when determining the schedule of the additional parenting time subject to subsection 2.
b.
Consider ordering the parents to use a co-parenting application to assist with scheduling and communication.
4.
The court may sanction a parent who fails to comply with this section as a contempt of court.
SECTION 2.
CHILD CUSTODY REVIEW TASK FORCE - REPORT TO THE LEGISLATIVE MANAGEMENT.
1.
During the 2025-26 interim, the legislative management shall create a child custody review task force.
The task force consists of:
a.
One member of the supreme court self-help program, appointed by the supreme court;
b.
One member representing the district courts, appointed by the supreme court;
c.
One member appointed by the state bar association;
S.
B.
NO.
2186 - PAGE 2 d.
Show all 90 changed rows (50 more)
Previous
Latest
Two members of the house or senate judiciary committees, appointed by the chairman of the legislative management;
e.
One member of the senate, appointed by the senate majority leader;
f.
One member of the house, appointed by the house majority leader;
g.
Two members representing parents subject to a child custody order;
h.
One member representing law enforcement;
i.
One member representing family mediators;
and j.
The director of legal services of North Dakota.
2.
The presiding officer of the task force must be a member of the legislative assembly appointed by the chairman of the legislative management.
3.
The task force shall meet at the call of the presiding officer.
The presiding officer of the task force may invite guests to participate in task force activities.
4.
The task force shall:
a.
Meet at least once each calendar quarter or more frequently at the call of the presiding officer;
b.
Address issues involving the withholding of a child in violation of a custody decree and issues relating to a parent or party who provides false information against another parent or party in connection to a child custody order;
c.
Consider ways to expeditiously and effectively enforce violations of custody orders, particularly the withholding of a child;
d.
Consider the development of self-help or artificial intelligence assisted forms and processes, expedited access to ex parte contempt of court orders, and other civil and criminal penalties, including possible additional compensatory time, and successful remedies used in other states;
and e.
Before June 30, 2026, submit a report of its findings and recommendations, and any proposed legislation necessary to implement the recommendations, to the legislative management.
5.
A member of the task force who is not a state employee is entitled to reimbursement for mileage and expenses as provided by law for state officers and employees, to be paid by the legislative council.
A state employee who is a member of the task force is entitled to receive that employee's regular salary and is entitled to reimbursement for mileage and expenses to be paid by the employing agency.
A member of the task force who is a member of the legislative assembly is entitled to receive per diem compensation at the rate provided under section 54-35-10 for each day performing official duties of the task force.
The legislative council shall pay the per diem compensation and reimbursement for travel and expenses as provided by law for any member of the task force who is a member of the legislative assembly.
6.
The legislative council shall provide staffing and administrative services for the task force through July 30, 2026.
S.
B.
NO.
2186 - PAGE 3 ____________________________ ____________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House ____________________________ ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Chief Clerk of the House This certifies that the within bill originated in the Senate of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as Senate Bill No.
2186.
Senate Vote:
Yeas 27 Nays 20 Absent 0 House Vote:
Yeas 84 Nays 9 Absent 1 ____________________________ Secretary of the Senate Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
View plain text versions (6)

Action History

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 04/23

  2. Signed by Governor 04/22

  3. Sent to Governor

  4. Signed by President

  5. Signed by Speaker

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 27 nays 20

  7. Concurred

  8. Returned to Senate (12)

  9. Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 84 nays 9

  10. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  11. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 12 1 1

  12. Committee Hearing 04:00

  13. Committee Hearing 10:30

  14. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

  15. Received from Senate

  16. Second reading, passed, yeas 26 nays 19

  17. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  18. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 4 3 0

  19. Committee Hearing 10:00

  20. Introduced, first reading, referred Judiciary Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 144 not signed on · 33 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Luick, Larry Republican
  • Rep. Koppelman, Ben
  • Rep. Marschall, Andrew

Not signed on (144)

144 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 144 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage

Passed 27 Yea · 20 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 261500
Unaffiliated 1000
Democratic 0500
Total 272000
% of votes cast 57%43%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Nay
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Nay
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Nay
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Nay
Cory, Claire Republican Nay
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Nay
Dwyer, Michael Republican Nay
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Nay
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Nay
Larson, Diane Republican Nay
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Nay
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Nay
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 84 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 74701
Democratic 9200
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 84901
% of votes cast 89%10%0%1%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Olson — Yea
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Nay
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Yea
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Nay
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Yea
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Brown, TJ Republican Yea
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Nay
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Nay
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Yea
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Nay
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Nay
Nehring, Dennis Republican Yea
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Nay
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Not Voting
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Nay
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Nay
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 26 Yea · 19 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 251402
Unaffiliated 1000
Democratic 0500
Total 261902
% of votes cast 55%40%0%4%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Not Voting
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Nay
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Nay
Dwyer, Michael Republican Nay
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Nay
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Nay
Larson, Diane Republican Nay
Lee, Judy Republican Nay
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Not Voting
Myrdal, Janne Republican Nay
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Nay
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Nay
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Nay
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Nay
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 2186 do?
AN ACT to create and enact a new section to chapter 14-09 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to interference with court-ordered parenting time; to create a child custody review task force; to provide for a legislative management report; and to provide a penalty.
Who sponsors SB 2186?
SB 2186 is sponsored by Clemens, David A. (Republican), Luick, Larry (Republican), Rep. Koppelman, Ben, and Rep. Marschall, Andrew.
What is the current status of SB 2186?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 13, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 2186?
Track SB 2186 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 2186

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 2186

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →