An Act relative to access to justice
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H1635 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H1635.
You're tracking H1635
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H1635 — An Act relative to access to justice
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An Act relative to access to justice
Bill Text
- Full text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill enhances protections for individuals regarding the disclosure of personal information in the context of immigration enforcement and criminal justice interactions.
-
Section 167A
(j) The department shall not disclose to any federal agency or permit any federal agency to access any files, data, or other information from the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles for purposes of civil immigration enforcement, provided that information concerning a particular identified individual may be disclosed upon receipt of a probable cause warrant signed by a judge. The Attorney General is authorized to bring an action in state or federal court to quash, modify, or otherwise contest any demand for information not in accordance with the requirements of this paragraph.
This addition prohibits the disclosure of personal information to federal agencies for immigration enforcement without a warrant.
-
Section 172
for any non-criminal justice purpose→ for any non-criminal justice purpose, including civil enforcement duties.This change restricts access to criminal offender record information for non-criminal justice purposes, specifically including civil enforcement duties.
-
Section 172
for any non-criminal justice purpose→ for any non-criminal justice purpose, including civil enforcement duties.This further restriction reinforces the prohibition on accessing criminal offender record information for non-criminal justice purposes.
-
Section 24
(f) federal detainees housed in their facilities to and from the several divisions or departments of the trial court, pursuant to a valid state court writ of habeas corpus.
This addition allows for the transport of federal detainees to court under specific legal conditions.
-
Chapter 147
Section 64. (a) An interview or any questioning conducted for immigration investigation or enforcement purposes of a person in the custody of any state or local law enforcement agency, sheriff’s office, the department of correction, or Massachusetts court, shall take place only with the written informed consent of the person in custody, unless otherwise required by federal law. If the person in custody indicates that they wish to have an attorney present for an interview with a federal agent, the custodian shall allow them to contact such attorney, and the interview shall not take place until an attorney is made available for the use of the person in custody. The custodian agency shall not be responsible for the payment of the person’s attorney’s fees and expenses.
This provision mandates informed consent for interviews related to immigration enforcement for individuals in custody.
-
Chapter 147
(b) The office of the attorney general shall prepare a uniform consent form in English and other languages commonly spoken in Massachusetts for use pursuant to subsection (a).
This establishes a requirement for a uniform consent form to facilitate understanding and consent of individuals being interviewed about immigration enforcement.
-
Chapter 147
(c) The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) shall not apply to persons in federal custody who are held in a state or local facility pursuant to an intergovernmental contract.
This limitation clarifies that the consent requirements do not apply to individuals in federal custody.
-
Chapter 147
(d) Court officers, clerks, probation department employees, other trial court administrative personnel, prosecutors, and personnel of the prosecutor’s office may provide federal agencies or agents with information relating to any person involved in matters before the court only upon request and in the same manner and to the same extent as such information is lawfully made available to the general public.
This allows specific court personnel to provide information to federal agencies only under certain conditions.
-
Section 3 of chapter 258B
(x) for victims, family members, and witnesses, to not be asked by a law enforcement agency, the prosecutor, personnel in the prosecutor’s office, trial court personnel, or parole, probation or corrections officials about their immigration status, or the immigration status of their family members, unless such inquiry is required by federal or state law; provided that a judge or magistrate may make such inquiries as are necessary to adjudicate matters within their jurisdiction.
This change prevents law enforcement and related officials from inquiring about the immigration status of victims and witnesses, reinforcing their protection in legal processes.
Sponsors
- Michael S. Day · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michael S. Day Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (203)
203 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 203 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H1635 do?
- An Act relative to access to justice
- Who sponsors H1635?
- H1635 is sponsored by Michael S. Day (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H1635?
- This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H1635?
- Track H1635 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H1635
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H1635
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →