An Act improving access to infertility treatment
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H1191 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H1191.
You're tracking H1191
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H1191 — An Act improving access to infertility treatment
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An Act improving access to infertility treatment
Bill Text
- Full text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies and expands the definition of infertility across multiple sections of Massachusetts law and enhances coverage requirements for infertility treatment.
-
Section 47H of chapter 175
(6) provide different benefits to, or impose different requirements for different groups, based on diagnosis.The bill removes provisions allowing for different benefits based on diagnosis.
-
Section 47H of chapter 175
this section shall not be construed to interfere with a medical provider’s, physician’s, or surgeon’s clinical judgment.The bill clarifies that the section does not interfere with medical professionals' clinical judgments.
-
Section 47H of chapter 175
The definition of "infertility" shall include a condition or status characterized by any of the following:→ For purposes of this section, “infertility” means a condition or status characterized by any of the following:The bill specifies the definition of infertility.
-
Section 47H of chapter 175
shalls be based on clinical guidelines and the patient’s medical history.→ , clinical guidelines shall be maintained in written form and available to any enrollee.The bill mandates that clinical guidelines be documented and accessible to enrollees.
-
Section 47H of chapter 175
or gestational carrier that enables an intended parent, member, and/or partner of a member to become a parent.→ and (ii) a gestational carrier that enables an intended parent, member, and/or partner of a member to become a parent.The bill clarifies the definition of third party regarding fertility services.
-
Section 8K of chapter 176A
this section shall not be construed to interfere with a medical provider’s, physician’s, or surgeon’s clinical judgment.The bill clarifies that the section does not interfere with medical professionals' clinical judgments.
-
Section 8K of chapter 176A
(6) provide different benefits to, or impose different requirements for different groups, based on diagnosis.The bill removes provisions allowing for different benefits based on diagnosis.
-
Section 8K of chapter 176A
Limitations on coverage coverage for medically necessary expenses of diagnosis and treatment of infertility shall be based on clinical guidelines and the patient's medical history.→ , clinical guidelines shall be maintained in written form and available to any enrollee.The bill mandates that clinical guidelines be documented and accessible to enrollees.
-
Section 8K of chapter 176A
(4) exclude services based on the quantity of the patient’s existing cryopreserved oocyte, sperm, or embryos; the provider’s discretion will determine if cryopreserved oocyte, sperm, or embryo provides a reasonable chance of success and whether additional fertility services are required;The bill prohibits excluding services based on the quantity of cryopreserved materials.
-
Section 4J of chapter 176B
the provisions shall not interfere with a medical provider’s, physician’s, or surgeon’s clinical judgment.The bill clarifies that the provisions do not interfere with medical professionals' clinical judgments.
-
Section 4J of chapter 176B
(6) provide different benefits to, or impose different requirements for different groups, based on diagnosis.The bill removes provisions allowing for different benefits based on diagnosis.
-
Section 4J of chapter 176B
Limitations on coverage coverage for medically necessary expenses of diagnosis and treatment of infertility shall be based on clinical guidelines and the patient's medical history.→ , clinical guidelines shall be maintained in written form and available to any enrollee.The bill mandates that clinical guidelines be documented and accessible to enrollees.
-
Section 4J of chapter 176B
this section shall not be construed to deny or restrict any existing right or benefit to coverage and treatment of infertility or fertility services under an existing law, plan, or policy.The bill ensures existing rights or benefits to infertility treatments are not denied.
-
Section 4J of chapter 176B
(4) exclude services based on the quantity of the patient’s existing cryopreserved oocyte, sperm, or embryos; the provider’s discretion will determine if cryopreserved oocyte, sperm, or embryo provides a reasonable chance of success and whether additional fertility services are required;The bill prohibits excluding services based on the quantity of cryopreserved materials.
Sponsors
- Kevin G. Honan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 203 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kevin G. Honan Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (203)
203 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 203 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H1191 do?
- An Act improving access to infertility treatment
- Who sponsors H1191?
- H1191 is sponsored by Kevin G. Honan (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H1191?
- This bill died with 194th General Court. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H1191?
- Track H1191 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H1191
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H1191
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →