North Dakota 69-2025 Assembly Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 3 D · 2 R cosponsors

HB 1564 — Relating to Indian child welfare.

Last action — Filed with Secretary Of State 04/11

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2025. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kelly Armstrong (Republican) on April 11, 2025.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 98% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 10 sponsors

    1 primary, 9 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (3 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill amends child welfare provisions related to Indian children.

This bill updates laws concerning the welfare of Indian children in North Dakota, focusing on active efforts for their family reunification. It outlines definitions and requirements for providing culturally appropriate support and services.

Summary

AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

406 added · 457 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill HB 1564 enhances the definition of "active efforts" in Indian child welfare cases. It emphasizes the importance of not only working to maintain or reunite Indian children with their families but also conducting these efforts in a culturally sensitive manner, in collaboration with the child's family and tribe. This change matters because it seeks to ensure that the needs and cultural backgrounds of Indian children are respected, improving the chances for family reunification and stability in their lives.

→
Previous
Latest
25.1211.01001 Adopted by the Senate Human Services Title.02000 Committee March 12, 2025 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO HOUSE BILL NO.
Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota In Regular Session Commencing Tuesday, January 7, 2025 HOUSE BILL NO.
1564 Introduced by Representatives Davis, Beltz, Brown, Finley-DeVille, Holle Senators Cleary, Cory, Hogan, Lee, Weston A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.
1564 (Representatives Davis, Beltz, Brown, Finley-DeVille, Holle) (Senators Cleary, Cory, Hogan, Lee, Weston) AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.
Page No.
(1) Conducting a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances of the Indian child's family, with a focus on safe reunification as the most desirable goal, with ongoing timely assessment to determine when the threat is resolved and placement of the Indian child can be returned to the custodian.
1 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (1) Conducting a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances of the Indian child's family, with a focus on safe reunification as the most desirable goal, with ongoing timely assessment to determine when the threat is resolved and placement of the Indian child can be returned to the custodian.
(7) Supporting regular visits with a parent or Indian custodian in the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the Indian child.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 2 (7) Supporting regular visits with a parent or Indian custodian in the most natural setting possible as well as trial home visits of the Indian child during any period of removal, consistent with the need to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the Indian child.
Page No.
(10) Considering alternative ways to address the needs of the Indian child's parent or Indian custodian and where appropriate, the family, if the optimum services do not exist or are not available.
2 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (10) Considering alternative ways to address the needs of the Indian child's parent or Indian custodian and where appropriate, the family, if the optimum services do not exist or are not available.
or Page No.
or (4) A termination of parental rights under section 27-20.3-20 for an Indian child.
3 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (4) A termination of parental rights under section 27-20.3-20 for an Indian child.
i.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 3 i.
Before removal of an Indian child from the custody of a parent or Indian custodian for purposes of involuntary foster care placement or the termination of parental rights over an Indian child, the court shall find that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative services designed to prevent the breakup of the Page No.
Before removal of an Indian child from the custody of a parent or Indian custodian for purposes of involuntary foster care placement or the termination of parental rights over an Indian child, the court shall find that active efforts have been made to provide remedial services and rehabilitative services designed to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and that these efforts have proved unsuccessful.
4 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly Indian family and that these efforts have proved unsuccessful.
As soon as the threat has been removed and the Indian child is no longer at risk, the state should terminate the removal, by returning the Indian child to the parent or Indian custodian while offering a solution to mitigate the situation that gave rise to the need for emergency removal and placement.If a court order authorizes the emergency removal of the Indian child from the parent or Indian custodian of the child under this section, the order must be accompanied by a declaration that includes:
As soon as the threat has been removed and the Indian child is no longer at risk, the state should terminate the removal, by returning the Indian child to the parent or Indian custodian while offering a solution to mitigate the situation that gave rise to the need for emergency removal and placement.
a.
The name, tribal affiliation, and address of the Indian child, each parent of the Indian child, and the Indian custodian of the child, as applicable;
and b.
A detailed account of the circumstances that led the agency responsible for emergency removal of the child to take that action.
The court may order the termination of parental rights over the Indian child only if the court determines, by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of Page No.
The court may order the termination of parental rights over the Indian child only if the court determines, by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child.
5 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly the Indian child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child.
In considering whether to involuntarily place an Indian child in foster care or to terminate the parental rights of the parent of an Indian child, the court shall require that a qualified expert witness must be qualified to testify regarding whether the Indian child's continued custody by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child and should be qualified to testify as to the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe.
In considering whether to involuntarily place an Indian child in foster care or to terminate the parental rights of the parent of an Indian child, the court shall require that a qualified expert H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 4 witness must be qualified to testify regarding whether the Indian child's continued custody by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child and should be qualified to testify as to the prevailing social and cultural standards of the Indian child's tribe.
If one or more parties have been found to be in default under the North Dakota Rules of CivilJuvenile Procedure, the court may accept a declaration or affidavit from a qualified expert witness without a stipulation in writing from the defaulted parties.
If one or more parties have been found to be in default under the North Dakota Rules of Juvenile Procedure, the court may accept a declaration or affidavit from a qualified expert witness without a stipulation in writing from the defaulted parties.
and Page No.
and b.
6 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly b.
8.9.
9.
and (2) A voluntary proceeding that could prohibit the parent or Indian custodian from regaining custody of the Indian child upon demand;
and H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 5 (2) A voluntary proceeding that could prohibit the parent or Indian custodian from regaining custody of the Indian child upon demand;
Page No.
2.
7 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 2.
In an Indian child custody proceeding under this chapter involving an Indian child who is not residing or domiciled within the reservation of the Indian child's tribe, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter, upon the petition of the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or tribe, shall transfer the proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe unless eitherany of the following appliesapply:
In an Indian child custody proceeding under this chapter involving an Indian child who is not residing or domiciled within the reservation of the Indian child's tribe, the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter, upon the petition of the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, or tribe, shall transfer the proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe unless either of the following applies:
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Previous
Latest
Page No.
5.6.
8 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 5.6.
b.c.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 6 b.
c.d.
c.
In a proceeding involving the foster care or nonfoster care placement of or termination of parental rights to an Indian child whom the court knows or has reason to know may be an Indian child, the party seeking the foster care or nonfoster care placement or Page No.
In a proceeding involving the foster care or nonfoster care placement of or termination of parental rights to an Indian child whom the court knows or has reason to know may be an Indian child, the party seeking the foster care or nonfoster care placement or termination of parental rights, for the first hearing of the proceeding, shall notify the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, and tribe, by registered mail, return receipt requested, of the pending proceeding and of the parties' right to intervene in the proceeding and shall file the return receipt with the court.
9 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly termination of parental rights, for the first hearing of the proceeding, shall notify the Indian child's parent, Indian custodian, and tribe, by registered mail, return receipt requested, of the pending proceeding and of the parties' right to intervene in the proceeding and shall file the return receipt with the court.
SECTION 5.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 7 SECTION 5.
Page No.
27-19.1-05.
10 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 27-19.1-05.
An Indian child who is the subject of an emergency removal or placement under a child custody determination under section 27-20.3-06 must be placed in compliance with foster care or nonfoster care placement or preadoptive placement preferences, Page No.
An Indian child who is the subject of an emergency removal or placement under a child custody determination under section 27-20.3-06 must be placed in compliance with foster care or nonfoster care placement or preadoptive placement preferences, unless the person responsible for determining the placement finds good cause, as described in subsection 6, for departing from the order of placement preference under subsection 2 or finds that emergency conditions necessitate departing from that order.
11 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly unless the person responsible for determining the placement finds good cause, as described in subsection 6, for departing from the order of placement preference under subsection 2 or finds that emergency conditions necessitate departing from that order.
5.
H.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 8 5.
Page No.
(2) The request of the Indian child, if the Indian child is of sufficient age and capacity to understand the decision being made.
12 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly (2) The request of the Indian child, if the Indian child is of sufficient age and capacity to understand the decision being made.
Page No.
H.
13 25.1211.01001 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 27-19.1-06.
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 9 27-19.1-06.
The state court entering a final adoption decree or order in any voluntary or involuntary Indian child adoptive placement must furnish a copy of the decree or order within thirty days to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Chief, Division of Human Services, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 3645 MIB, Washington, DC 20240as prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, along with the following information, in an envelope marked "Confidential":
The state court entering a final adoption decree or order in any voluntary or involuntary Indian child adoptive placement must furnish a copy of the decree or order within thirty days to the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Chief, Division of Human Services, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop MIB, Washington, DC 20240as prescribed by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, along with the following information, in an envelope marked "Confidential":
Page No.
H.
14 25.1211.01001
B.
NO.
1564 - PAGE 10 ____________________________ ____________________________ Speaker of the House President of the Senate ____________________________ ____________________________ Chief Clerk of the House Secretary of the Senate This certifies that the within bill originated in the House of Representatives of the Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota and is known on the records of that body as House Bill No.
1564.
House Vote:
Yeas 91 Nays 0 Absent 3 Senate Vote:
Yeas 47 Nays 0 Absent 0 ____________________________ Chief Clerk of the House Received by the Governor at ________M.
on _____________________________________, 2025.
Approved at ________M.
on __________________________________________________, 2025.
____________________________ Governor Filed in this office this ___________day of _______________________________________, 2025, at ________ o’clock ________M.
____________________________ Secretary of State
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (4)

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends several sections of North Dakota law related to Indian child welfare, enhancing the definition of 'active efforts' and procedures for Indian child custody proceedings.

  • 27-19.1-01

    1. As used in this chapter, unless context requires otherwise: a. "Active efforts" means affirmative, active, thorough, and timely efforts intended primarily to maintain or reunite an Indian child with the Indian child's family...

    It redefines 'active efforts' to include specific detailed actions intended to support Indian families and children.

  • 27-19.1-01

    g. "Indian child custody proceeding" means a proceeding brought by the state involving: (1) Foster care or nonfoster care placement; (2) A preadoptive placement; (3) An adoptive placement; or (4) A termination of parental rights under section 27-20.3-20 for an Indian child.

    It clarifies the definition of 'Indian child custody proceeding' to specify the types of placements and rights involved.

  • 27-19.1-01

    b. "Adoptive placement" means the permanent placement of an Indian child for adoption.

    It introduces a clear definition for 'adoptive placement' in the context of Indian child welfare.

  • 27-19.1-02

    The court shall find that active efforts have been made... The court may not order the removal unless evidence of active efforts shows there has been a vigorous and concerted level of casework beyond the level that would constitute reasonable efforts under section 27-20.3-26.

    It establishes a requirement for courts to find that 'active efforts' are made before any removal of an Indian child.

  • 27-19.1-03

    The court may order the termination of parental rights over the Indian child only if the court determines, by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that continued custody of the Indian child is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the Indian child.

    It sets a higher standard of evidence for courts when deciding to terminate parental rights.

  • 27-19.1-03

    5. In considering whether to involuntarily place an Indian child in foster care or to terminate the parental rights... If the parties stipulate in writing... the court may accept a declaration or affidavit from a qualified expert witness in lieu of testimony.

    It provides a process for accepting expert testimony in Indian child custody proceedings.

Action History

  1. Filed with Secretary Of State 04/11

  2. Signed by Governor 04/10

  3. Sent to Governor

  4. Signed by Speaker

  5. Signed by President

  6. Second reading, passed, yeas 91 nays 0

  7. Concurred

  8. Returned to House (12)

  9. Second reading, passed as amended, yeas 47 nays 0

  10. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  11. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 5 0 1

  12. Committee Hearing 10:45

  13. Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services Committee

  14. Received from House

  15. Second reading, passed, yeas 90 nays 1

  16. Reported back, do pass, place on calendar 13 0 0

  17. Committee Hearing 09:30

  18. Introduced, first reading, referred Human Services Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 138 not signed on · 1 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (9)

Not signed on (138)

138 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 138 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage

Passed 91 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 80002
Democratic 10001
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 91003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (94)
Member Party Vote
Olson — Yea
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Not Voting
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Yea
Brown, TJ Republican Yea
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Not Voting
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Yea
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 47 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 41000
Democratic 5000
Total 47000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Yea
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Yea
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Yea
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Yea
Mathern, Tim Democratic Yea
Axtman, Michelle Republican Yea
Barta, Jeff Republican Yea
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Yea
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Yea
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Yea
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Yea
Dever, Dick Republican Yea
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Yea
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Yea
Klein, Jerry Republican Yea
Larson, Diane Republican Yea
Lee, Judy Republican Yea
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Yea
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Yea
Rummel, Dean Republican Yea
Schaible, Donald Republican Yea
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Yea
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Yea
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Yea
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Yea
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Final Passage

Passed 90 Yea · 1 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 78102
Democratic 11000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 90102
% of votes cast 97%1%0%2%
How each member voted (93)
Member Party Vote
Olson — Yea
Brown, Collette Democratic Yea
Conmy, Liz Democratic Yea
Davis, Jayme Democratic Yea
Dobervich, Gretchen Democratic Yea
Finley-DeVille, Lisa Democratic Yea
Foss, Austin Democratic Yea
Hager, LaurieBeth Democratic Yea
Hanson, Karla Rose Democratic Yea
Ista, Zachary Democratic Yea
Mitskog, Alisa Democratic Yea
Schneider, Mary Democratic Yea
Anderson, Bert Republican Yea
Anderson, Dick Republican Yea
Anderson, Karen A. Republican Yea
Bahl, Landon Republican Yea
Beltz, Mike Republican Yea
Berg, Mike Republican Yea
Bolinske, Macy Republican Yea
Bosch, Glenn Republican Yea
Brandenburg, Mike Republican Not Voting
Christianson, Nels Republican Yea
Dockter, Jason Republican Yea
Dressler, Ty Republican Yea
Fegley, Clayton Republican Yea
Fisher, Jay Republican Yea
Frelich, Kathy Republican Yea
Grindberg, Karen Republican Yea
Grueneich, Jim Republican Yea
Hagert, Jared C. Republican Yea
Hatlestad, Patrick R. Republican Yea
Hauck, Dori Republican Yea
Headland, Craig Republican Yea
Heilman, Matthew Republican Yea
Heinert, Pat D. Republican Yea
Henderson, Donna Republican Yea
Hendrix, Jared Republican Yea
Holle, Dawson Republican Yea
Hoverson, Jeff Republican Yea
Johnson, Jorin Republican Yea
Johnston, Daniel Republican Yea
Jonas, Jim Republican Yea
Karls, Karen Republican Yea
Kasper, Jim Republican Yea
Kempenich, Keith Republican Not Voting
Kiefert, Dwight Republican Yea
Klemin, Lawrence R. Republican Yea
Koppelman, Ben Republican Yea
Lefor, Mike Republican Yea
Longmuir, Donald W. Republican Yea
Louser, Scott Republican Yea
Maki, Roger A. Republican Yea
Marschall, Andrew Republican Yea
Martinson, Bob Republican Yea
McLeod, Carrie Republican Yea
Meier, Lisa Republican Yea
Monson, David Republican Yea
Morton, Desiree Republican Yea
Motschenbacher, Mike Republican Yea
Murphy, Eric J. Republican Yea
Nathe, Mike Republican Yea
Nehring, Dennis Republican Nay
Nelson, Jon O. Republican Yea
Novak, Anna S. Republican Yea
O'Brien, Emily Republican Yea
Olson, Jeremy Republican Yea
Osowski, Doug Republican Yea
Ostlie, Mitch Republican Yea
Porter, Todd Republican Yea
Pyle, Brandy L. Republican Yea
Richter, David Republican Yea
Rios, Nico Republican Yea
Rohr, Karen M. Republican Yea
Ruby, Dan Republican Yea
Ruby, Matthew Republican Yea
Sanford, Mark Republican Yea
Satrom, Bernie Republican Yea
Schatz, Mike Republican Yea
Schauer, Austen Republican Yea
Schreiber-Beck, Cynthia Republican Yea
Steiner, Vicky Republican Yea
Stemen, Gregory Republican Yea
Swiontek, Steve Republican Yea
Toman, Nathan Republican Yea
Tveit, Bill Republican Yea
VanWinkle, Lori Republican Yea
Vetter, Steve Republican Yea
Vigesaa, Don Republican Yea
Vollmer, Daniel R. Republican Yea
Wagner, Scott Republican Yea
Warrey, Jonathan Republican Yea
Weisz, Robin Republican Yea
Wolff, Christina Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1564 do?
AN ACT to amend and reenact sections 27-19.1-01 and 27-19.1-02, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-03, subsection 1 of section 27-19.1-04, and sections 27-19.1-05 and 27-19.1-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to Indian child welfare.
Who sponsors HB 1564?
HB 1564 is sponsored by Brown, Collette (Democratic), Davis, Jayme (Democratic), Beltz, Mike (Republican), Finley-DeVille, Lisa (Democratic), Holle, Dawson (Republican), Sen. Cleary, Sean, Sen. Cory, Claire, Sen. Hogan, Kathy, Sen. Lee, Judy, and Sen. Weston, Kent.
What is the current status of HB 1564?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2025. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 1564?
Track HB 1564 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1564

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 1564

Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →