North Dakota 69-2025 Assembly Status: Passed House 3 R cosponsors

HB 1368 — Relating to the authority of the administrative rules committee to void an administrative rule.

Last action — Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 22 nays 24

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 13, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 9 sponsors

    1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 R).

  • Failed a recorded vote

    Failed 1 recorded vote so far — a real headwind.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 1 of section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the authority of the administrative rules committee to void an administrative rule.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

70 added · 92 removed

70 line(s) added, 92 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
25.0688.03002 Prepared by the Legislative Council Title.04000 staff for Senator Walen April 3, 2025 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO.
25.0688.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly of North Dakota FIRST ENGROSSMENT ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL NO.
1368 Introduced by Representatives Koppelman, Kasper, Louser Senators Clemens, Cory, Lemm, Magrum, Myrdal, Paulson A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to voiding and amending administrative rules by the administrative rules committee.for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 1 of section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the authority of the administrative rules committee to void an administrative rule.
1368 Introduced by Representatives Koppelman, Kasper, Louser Senators Clemens, Cory, Lemm, Magrum, Myrdal, Paulson A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to voiding and amending administrative rules by the administrative rules committee.
Page No.
d.
1 25.0688.03002 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly d.
h.
Page No.
1 25.0688.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly h.
If the adopting Page No.
If the adopting agency does not file a petition for review, the rule becomes void on the fifteenth day after the notice from the legislative council to the adopting agency.
2 25.0688.03002 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly agency does not file a petition for review, the rule becomes void on the fifteenth day after the notice from the legislative council to the adopting agency.
3.6.
Page No.
2 25.0688.03000 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly 3.6.
SECTION 1.
AMENDMENT.
Subsection 1 of section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code is amended and reenacted as follows:
1.
The legislative management's administrative rules committee may find that all or any portion of a rule is void if that rule is initially considered by the committee not later than the fifteenth day of the month before the date of the administrative code supplement in which the rule change is scheduled to appear.
The administrative rules committee may find a rule or portion of a rule void if the committee makes the specific finding that, with regard to that rule or portion of a rule, there is:
a.
An absence of statutory authority.
b.
An emergency relating to public health, safety, or welfare.
c.
A failure to comply with express legislative intent or to substantially meet the procedural requirements of this chapter for adoption of the rule.
d.
A conflict with state law.
3 25.0688.03002 Sixty-ninth Legislative Assembly e.
3 25.0688.03000
Arbitrariness andor capriciousness.
f.
A failure to make a written record of its consideration of written and oral submissions respecting the rule under section 28-32-11.
Page No.
4 25.0688.03002
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Second reading, failed to pass, yeas 22 nays 24

  2. Amendment adopted

  3. Amendment proposed on floor

  4. Reported back, do not pass, placed on calendar 4 2 0

  5. Committee Hearing 09:00

  6. Introduced, first reading, referred State and Local Government Committee

  7. Received from House

  8. Second reading, passed, yeas 84 nays 7

  9. Amendment adopted, placed on calendar

  10. Reported back amended, do pass, amendment placed on calendar 11 0 2

  11. Committee Hearing 03:00

  12. Introduced, first reading, referred Political Subdivisions Committee

Sponsors

  • Ben Koppelman · Primary
  • Jim Kasper · Cosponsor
  • Scott Louser · Cosponsor
  • David A. Sen. Clemens · Cosponsor
  • Claire Sen. Cory · Cosponsor
  • Randy D. Sen. Lemm · Cosponsor
  • Jeffery J. Sen. Magrum · Cosponsor
  • Janne Sen. Myrdal · Cosponsor
  • Bob Sen. Paulson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on · 24 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (8)

  • Kasper, Jim Republican
  • Louser, Scott Republican
  • Sen. Clemens, David A.
  • Sen. Cory, Claire
  • Sen. Lemm, Randy D.
  • Sen. Magrum, Jeffery J.
  • Sen. Myrdal, Janne
  • Sen. Paulson, Bob

Not signed on (139)

139 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 139 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Final Passage

Failed 22 Yea · 24 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 211901
Democratic 0500
Total 222401
% of votes cast 47%51%0%2%
How each member voted (47)
Member Party Vote
van Oosting — Yea
Boschee, Josh Democratic Nay
Braunberger, Ryan Democratic Nay
Hogan, Kathy Democratic Nay
Marcellais, Richard Democratic Nay
Mathern, Tim Democratic Nay
Axtman, Michelle Republican Nay
Barta, Jeff Republican Nay
Beard, Todd Republican Yea
Bekkedahl, Brad Republican Nay
Boehm, Keith Republican Yea
Burckhard, Randy A. Republican Nay
Castaneda, Jose L. Republican Yea
Cleary, Sean Republican Yea
Clemens, David A. Republican Yea
Conley, Cole Republican Nay
Cory, Claire Republican Yea
Davison, Kyle Republican Nay
Dever, Dick Republican Nay
Dwyer, Michael Republican Yea
Enget, Mark Republican Yea
Erbele, Robert Republican Nay
Gerhardt, Justin Republican Yea
Hogue, David Republican Yea
Kessel, Greg Republican Nay
Klein, Jerry Republican Nay
Larson, Diane Republican Nay
Lee, Judy Republican Nay
Lemm, Randy D. Republican Yea
Luick, Larry Republican Yea
Magrum, Jeffery J. Republican Yea
Meyer, Scott Republican Yea
Myrdal, Janne Republican Yea
Patten, Dale Republican Nay
Paulson, Bob Republican Yea
Powers, Michelle Republican Yea
Roers, Kristin Republican Nay
Rummel, Dean Republican Nay
Schaible, Donald Republican Nay
Sickler, Jonathan Republican Nay
Sorvaag, Ronald Republican Nay
Thomas, Paul J. Republican Not Voting
Walen, Chuck Republican Yea
Wanzek, Terry M. Republican Nay
Weber, Mark F. Republican Yea
Weston, Kent Republican Yea
Wobbema, Mike Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1368 do?
A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact subsection 1 of section 28-32-18 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the authority of the administrative rules committee to void an administrative rule.
Who sponsors HB 1368?
HB 1368 is sponsored by Koppelman, Ben (Republican), Kasper, Jim (Republican), Louser, Scott (Republican), Sen. Clemens, David A., Sen. Cory, Claire, Sen. Lemm, Randy D., Sen. Magrum, Jeffery J., Sen. Myrdal, Janne, and Sen. Paulson, Bob.
What is the current status of HB 1368?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced January 13, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 1368?
Track HB 1368 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1368

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1368

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →