SB 329 — Relating to judges and justices; to prohibit government agencies, individuals, businesses, and associations from publicly posting or displaying judge's or justice's personal information on the Internet, provided they have received a written request from the judge or justice to refrain from doing so; to prohibit commercial data collectors from knowingly selling, trading, licensing, transferring, or purchasing judges' personal information; to provide for a process for a judge or justice to request their personal information not be made public; to provide for penalties for violations; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.
Last action — Read First Time in Second House
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Judges, prohibit certain agencies from publicly posting or displaying a judge's personal information in certain circumstances, to provide for penalties for violations
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
272 added · 294 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 329 now includes explicit references to judges and justices, clarifying that the law specifically protects their personal information from being posted online. Additionally, the revised bill establishes a process for judges to request that their personal information remains private and outlines penalties for violations of this privacy. These changes enhance the bill's focus on protecting the identities of judicial officers, which is crucial for their safety and independence in performing their duties.
SB329 INTRODUCEDENGROSSED LPH7AW-1LPH7AW-2 By Senator Barfoot RFD:
16-May-23 2023 Regular Session Page 0 LPH7AW-1SB329 05/16/2023Engrossed CNB2 (L)bm4 2023-19796 2A 4BILL SYNOPSIS:TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Relating to judges and justices;
Thisto billprohibit createsgovernment agencies, individuals, businesses, and associations from publicly posting or displaying judge's or justice's personal information on the JudicialInternet, Privacyprovided Act.they have received a written request from the judge or justice to refrain from doing so;
Thisto bill would prohibit governmentcommercial agencies,data individuals,collectors businesses, and associations from publiclyknowingly postingselling, ortrading, displayinglicensing, judge'stransferring, or justice'spurchasing personallyjudges' identifiablepersonal informationinformation; on the Internet, provided they have received a written request from the judge or justice to refrain from doing so.
This bill would prohibit commercial data collectors from knowingly selling, trading, licensing, transferring, or purchasing judges' personally identifiable information.
This bill would provide for a process for judges and justices to request their personal information not be made public.
This bill would also provide for penalties for violations.
Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022, prohibits a general law whose purpose or effect would be to require a new or increased expenditure of local funds from becoming effective with regard to a local governmental entity without enactment by a 2/3 vote unless:
it comes within one of a number of specified exceptions;
it is approved by the affected entity;
or the Legislature appropriates funds, or Page 1 SB329 INTRODUCED provides a local source of revenue, to the entity for the purpose.
The purpose or effect of this bill would be to require a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of the amendment.
However, the bill does not require approval of a local governmental entity or enactment by a 2/3 vote to become effective because it comes within one of the specified exceptions contained in the amendment.
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Relating to judges and justices;
to prohibit government agencies, individuals, businesses, and associations from publicly posting or displaying judge's or justice's personally identifiable information on the Internet, provided they have received a written request from the judge or justice to refrain from doing so;
to prohibit commercial data collectors from knowingly selling, trading, licensing, transferring, or purchasing judges' personally identifiable information;
and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Page 2 SB329 INTRODUCED Section 111.05 of the Constitution of Alabama of 2022.
As used in this section,act, the following terms have the following meanings:
Page 1 SB329 Engrossed (1) DATA BROKER.
Reporting, news-gathering,news-gathering by a news-gathering organization, speaking, or other activities intended to inform the public on matters of public interest or concern.
For the purpose of this subdivision, a "news-gathering organization" means any of the following:
(i) A newspaper, news publication, or news source, printed or on an online platform, of current news and public interest.
(ii) A radio broadcast station, television broadcast station, or cable television operator.
An executive, legislative, or judicial agency, department, board, commission, authority, institution, or instrumentality of the federal government or Page 2 SB329 Engrossed of a state or of a county, municipality, or other political Page 3 SB329 INTRODUCED subdivision of a state.
JusticeJudge of the AlabamaUnited SupremeStates Circuit Court.
Judge of the AlabamaUnited CourtStates ofDistrict CriminalCourt. Appeals.
Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court.
d.
Justice the Alabama Supreme Court.
e.
Judge of the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.
f.
95g. d.
e.h.
f.i.
g.j.
Page 3 SB329 Engrossed d.
Page 4 SB329 INTRODUCED h.
95 l.
(7) PUBLICLY AVAILABLE CONTENT.
Show all 62 changed lines (22 more)
Any written, printed, or electronic document or record that is maintained, controlled, or in possession of a government agency that may be obtained by any individual or entity from the Internet, from the government agency upon request either free of charge or for a fee, or in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
(8) PUBLICLY POST OR DISPLAY.
To communicate to another or otherwise make available to the public.
(a) GovernmentA agenciesgovernment agency shall not publicly post or display publicly availableon contenta thatwebsite includes the personal information of a judicial officer or his or her immediate family, provided that the government agency has received a written request in accordance with Section 6.
(b)(1)(b) AfterWithin a10 governmentbusiness agencydays hasof receivedreceipt aof the written request, the government agency shall remove the judicial officer's and his or her immediate family's personal information from publiclythe availablewebsite. content within five Page 5 SB329 INTRODUCED business days of such receipt.
(2)(c) AfterThe the government agency has removed the judicial officer's and his or her immediate family's personal information fromshall publiclybe availableconfidential content,and thenot governmentalbe agencyconsidered shalla notpublic publiclyrecord postfor orpurposes displayof theArticle personal3 information.of Chapter 12 of Title 36, Code of Alabama 1975.
Additionally,(d) theIf judiciala officer'sgovernment andagency hisfails orto hercomply immediatewith family's personal information shall confidential and not be considered a publicwritten recordrequest forto purposesrefrain offrom Articleposting 3or ofdisplaying Chapterpersonal 11Page of4 TitleSB329 40,Engrossed Codeinformation ofpublicly Alabamaon 1975,a unlesswebsite, the governmentjudicial agencyofficer hasmay receivedbring consentan fromaction theseeking judicialinjunctive officeror todeclaratory makerelief thein personalany informationcourt aof publiccompetent record.jurisdiction.
(c) If a government agency fails to comply with a written request to refrain from disclosing personal information, the judicial officer may bring an action seeking injunctive or declaratory relief in any court of competent jurisdiction.
(1) The display on the Internet of personal information of a judicial officer or the immediate family if the information is relevant to and displayed as part of a news Page 6 SB329 INTRODUCED story, commentary, editorial, or other speech on a matter of public concern.
Page 5 SB329 Engrossed (d) After a person has received a written request from a judicial officer, that person shall ensure that the judicial officer's and his or her immediate family member's personal information is not made available on any website or subsidiary website controlled by that person.
(2) If the court grants injunctive or declaratory relief, the person responsible for the violation shall be Page 7 SB329 INTRODUCED required to pay the judicial officer's court costs and reasonable attorney's fees.
Page 6 SB329 Engrossed Section 6.
Every three months, the Alabama Administrative Office of Courts Page 8 SB329 INTRODUCED shall provide a list to the appropriate officer with supervisory authority for a government agency of all judicial officers who have submitted a written request to it.
(c) A representative from the judicial officer's employer may submit a written request on the judicial officer's behalf if the judicial officer gives written consent to the representative and the representative agrees to furnish Page 7 SB329 Engrossed a copy of that consent when a written request is made.
(e) A judicial officer's written request is valid until Page 9 SB329 INTRODUCED the judicial officer provides the government agency, individual, business, or association with written permission to release private information.
(a) It is unlawful for a person to knowingly publicly post on the Internet the personal information of a judicial officer or the judicial officer's immediate family if the individual knows or should have known that publicly posting the personal information poses an imminent and serious threat to the health and safety of the judicial officer or the judicial officer's immediate family, and the violation is a proximate cause of bodily injury or death of the judicial officer or a member of the judicial officer's immediate Page 8 SB329 Engrossed family.
Section 8.Provided8. that the employee of a government agency has complied with the conditions set forth in Sections 3 through 6, it is not a violation of this section if an employee of a government agency publishes personal information, in good faith, on the website of the government agency in the ordinary course of carrying out public functions.
Provided that the employee of a government agency has complied with the conditions set forth in Sections 3 through 6, it is not a violation of this act if an employee of a government agency publishes personal information, in good faith, on the website of the government agency in the ordinary course of carrying out public functions.
Page 10 SB329 INTRODUCED Section 10.
Page 119 SB329 Engrossed Senate Read for the first time and referred ................16-May-23 to the Senate committee on Judiciary Read for the second time and placed ................24-May-23 on the calendar:
0 amendments Read for the third time and passed ................25-May-23 as amended Yeas 30 Nays 0 Abstains 0 Patrick Harris, Secretary.
Page 10
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Referred to Committee
Sponsors
- Will Barfoot · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 22 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Not Voting |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Yea |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Yea |
| Merika Coleman | D | Yea |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Yea |
| William M. Beasley | D | Not Voting |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Not Voting |
| Arthur Orr | R | Yea |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Yea |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Not Voting |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Not Voting |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Yea |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Yea |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Yea |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 22 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| D | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 29 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Not Voting |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Yea |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Yea |
| Merika Coleman | D | Yea |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Yea |
| William M. Beasley | D | Not Voting |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Not Voting |
| Arthur Orr | R | Yea |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Yea |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Not Voting |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Not Voting |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Yea |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Yea |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Yea |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 329 do?
- Judges, prohibit certain agencies from publicly posting or displaying a judge's personal information in certain circumstances, to provide for penalties for violations
- Who sponsors SB 329?
- SB 329 is sponsored by Will Barfoot (R).
- What is the current status of SB 329?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 329?
- Track SB 329 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 329
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 329
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →