Alabama 2023 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 159 — Relating to civil liability; to amend Sections 6-5-700, 6-5-701, 6-5-702, 6-5-703, 6-5-704, 6-5-705, and 6-5-708, Code of Alabama 1975, to further provide for the liability of a public awarding authority and its contractors regarding the construction and maintenance of public roads; to delete an exception to the statutory protection from liability of a contractor; to create a rebuttable presumption of nonliability of the awarding authority and its contractors when certain circumstances apply; and to provide certain pleading requirements in the filing of a complaint for injury or death arising form the construction or maintenance of a public road.

Last action — Enacted as 2023-316

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 04, 2023. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kay Ivey (Republican) on May 30, 2023.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 5 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Highways, roads and bridges, contracts for construction, repair or maintenance, awarding authority defined, contractors immune from civil liability if compliant with contract and accepted by awarding authority.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

248 added · 244 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to SB 159 clarifies the liability rules for public authorities and their contractors involved in building and maintaining roads. It removes a previous exception that shielded contractors from liability, meaning they could now be held responsible under more circumstances. Additionally, the bill establishes a rebuttable presumption of nonliability, which means that contractors and public authorities are presumed not liable unless proven otherwise in specific situations. This change is significant because it aims to make it easier for individuals injured due to road construction or maintenance to seek compensation.

→
Previous
Latest
SB159 ENGROSSED GY8QC6-2 By Senator Scofield RFD:
SB159 ENROLLED GY8QC6-3 By Senator Scofield RFD:
04-Apr-23 2023 Regular Session Page 0 SB159 Engrossed 2 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 7 Relating to civil liability;
04-Apr-23 2023 Regular Session Page 0 SB159 Enrolled Enrolled, An Act, Relating to civil liability;
Page 1 SB159 Engrossed a.
a.
The county governing body, if the contractor enters into a contract with that county to construct, repair, or maintain a highway, a road, or a street for that the county where the project is bid and let to contract by the county commission;
The county governing body, if the contractor enters Page 1 SB159 Enrolled into a contract with that county to construct, repair, or maintain a highway, a road, or a street for that the county where the project is bid and let to contract by the county commission;
Page 2 SB159 Engrossed b.
b.
The date following the expiration of 45 days after the contractor provides, by certified mail return receipt requested, notice of presumptive conclusion of the project to the awarding authority and the awarding authority fails to respond.
The date following the expiration of 45 days after the contractor provides, by certified mail return receipt requested, notice Page 2 SB159 Enrolled of presumptive conclusion of the project to the awarding authority and the awarding authority fails to respond.
A defect or omission resulting from the work conducted or materials provided by the contractor Page 3 SB159 Engrossed under the contract which was not discoverable, visible, or apparent.
A defect or omission resulting from the work conducted or materials provided by the contractor under the contract which was not discoverable, visible, or apparent.
The construction, repair, or maintenance by a contractor of a section of highway, road, bridge, or street together with all appurtenances, as specified in a contract with an awarding authority.
The construction, repair, or maintenance by a contractor of a section of highway, road, bridge, or street together with all appurtenances, as specified in a Page 3 SB159 Enrolled contract with an awarding authority.
Specifications, plans, traffic control requirements, communication requirements, drawings, bid documents, or any other written or electronically stored requirements and details the contractor agrees to perform." 95 "§6-5-701 A contractor is justified ordinarily in relying upon the plans and specifications that are contained in the contract with an awarding authority.
Specifications, plans, traffic control requirements, communication requirements, drawings, bid documents, or any other written or electronically stored requirements and details the contractor agrees to perform." "§6-5-701 A contractor is justified ordinarily in relying upon the plans and specifications that are contained in the contract with an awarding authority.
No contractor shall be held civilly liable for work performed on a highway, road, bridge, or street the project, including repairs, construction, or maintenance on behalf of the awarding authority, unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that physical injury, property damage, or death is proximately caused by any either of the following:
No contractor shall be held civilly liable for work performed on a highway, road, 95 bridge, or street the project, including repairs, construction, or maintenance on behalf of the awarding authority, unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that physical injury, property damage, or death is proximately caused by any either of the following:
(3)(2) A latent defect which creates a dangerous condition that is the result of the work of the contractor." Page 4 SB159 Engrossed "§6-5-702 (a) In any action for injury, damages, or wrongful death, whether in contract or in tort, against an awarding authority or its contractors arising from any negligent act or omission in the construction or maintenance of a public road, when it is established by a preponderance of the evidence that the operator of the vehicle engaged in conduct that would have supported a violation of Sections 32-5A-191 or 32-5A-350, or that the vehicle was traveling at a rate of 25 or more miles per hour over the applicable speed limit, there shall be established a rebuttable presumption that the prohibited conduct was the proximate cause of the injury, damages, or wrongful death.
(3)(2) A latent defect which creates a dangerous condition that is the result of the work of the contractor." "§6-5-702 (a) In any action for injury, damages, or wrongful death, whether in contract or in tort, against an awarding authority or its contractors arising from any negligent act or omission in the construction or maintenance of a public road, Page 4 SB159 Enrolled when it is established by a preponderance of the evidence that the operator of the vehicle engaged in conduct that would have supported a violation of Sections 32-5A-191 or 32-5A-350, or that the vehicle was traveling at a rate of 25 or more miles per hour over the applicable speed limit, there shall be established a rebuttable presumption that the prohibited conduct was the proximate cause of the injury, damages, or wrongful death.
(b) The rebuttable presumption established in subsection (a) may be overcome by the plaintiff establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the prohibited conduct was not the proximate cause of the injury, damages, or wrongful death.During the course of construction, a contractor who constructs, maintains, or repairs a highway, road, street, or bridge for the awarding authority is not liable to a claimant for personal injury, property damage, or death arising from the performance of such construction, maintenance, or repair, if, at the time of the personal injury, property damage, or death, the contractor was in compliance with contract documents material to the condition, including the traffic control plan, that was the proximate cause of the personal injury, property damage, or death unless following the plans and specifications would result in a Page 5 SB159 Engrossed dangerous condition that should have appeared to be defective to a reasonably prudent contractor or that the contractor should have known that following the plans and specifications could create a dangerous condition that caused the injury or death." "§6-5-703 In any action for injury, damages, or wrongful death, whether in contract or in tort, against an awarding authority or its contractors arising from any negligent act or omission in the construction or maintenance of a public road, the plaintiff shall include in the complaint filed in the action a detailed specification and factual description of each act and omission alleged by the plaintiff, and shall include when feasible and ascertainable the date, time, and place of the act or acts.
(b) The rebuttable presumption established in subsection (a) may be overcome by the plaintiff establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the prohibited conduct was not the proximate cause of the injury, damages, or wrongful death.During the course of construction, a contractor who constructs, maintains, or repairs a highway, road, street, or bridge for the awarding authority is not liable to a claimant for personal injury, property damage, or death arising from the performance of such construction, maintenance, or repair, if, at the time of the personal injury, property damage, or death, the contractor was in compliance with contract documents material to the condition, including the traffic control plan, that was the proximate cause of the personal injury, property damage, or death unless following the plans and specifications would result in a dangerous condition that should have appeared to be defective to a reasonably prudent contractor or that the contractor should have known that following the plans and specifications could create a dangerous condition that caused the injury or death." Page 5 SB159 Enrolled "§6-5-703 In any action for injury, damages, or wrongful death, whether in contract or in tort, against an awarding authority or its contractors arising from any negligent act or omission in the construction or maintenance of a public road, the plaintiff shall include in the complaint filed in the action a detailed specification and factual description of each act and omission alleged by the plaintiff, and shall include when feasible and ascertainable the date, time, and place of the act or acts.
This section shall not apply to claims by the awarding authority or contractor against each other.If, prior to or during the course of construction, a contractor discovers or determines that following the plans and specifications could result in a potentially dangerous condition, then the contractor shall, with specificity of such condition, expressly notify the Chief Engineer of the Alabama Page 6 SB159 Engrossed Department of Transportation in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested.
This section shall not apply to claims by the awarding authority or contractor against each other.If, prior to or during the course of construction, a contractor discovers or determines that following the plans and specifications could result in a potentially dangerous condition, then the contractor shall, with specificity of such condition, expressly notify the Chief Engineer of the Alabama Department of Transportation in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested.
The Alabama Department of Transportation, or the awarding authority, shall respond to the specific condition raised within 14 days in writing as to its decision as to the appropriate response to the dangerous condition.
The Alabama Department of Transportation, or the awarding authority, shall respond to the specific condition raised within 14 days in writing as to its decision as to the appropriate response to the dangerous Page 6 SB159 Enrolled condition.
(2) The contractor undertakes to provide design or professional engineering services as to the roadway or project." "§6-5-705 The contractor shall bear no civil liability for any dangerous condition that is outside of the scope of the project or that is in excess of any requirement of the Page 7 SB159 Engrossed governing plans and specifications provided by the awarding authority.
(2) The contractor undertakes to provide design or professional engineering services as to the roadway or project." "§6-5-705 The contractor shall bear no civil liability for any dangerous condition that is outside of the scope of the project or that is in excess of any requirement of the governing plans and specifications provided by the awarding authority.
(1) The contractor contracts to design in whole or in part the roadway or project or to provide professional engineering services as to the design of the roadway project.
(1) The contractor contracts to design in whole or in part the roadway or project or to provide professional Page 7 SB159 Enrolled engineering services as to the design of the roadway project.
Page 8 SB159 Engrossed Senate Read for the first time and referred ................04-Apr-23 to the Senate committee on Judiciary Read for the second time and placed ................03-May-23 on the calendar:
Page 8 SB159 Enrolled ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB159 Senate 11-May-23 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate, as amended.
0 amendments Read for the third time and passed ................11-May-23 as amended Yeas 34 Nays 0 Abstains 0 Patrick Harris, Secretary.
Patrick Harris, Secretary.
Page 9
House of Representatives Passed:
23-May-23 By:
Senator Scofield Page 9
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

3 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Enrolled

Sponsors

  • Scofield · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Scofield

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (139)

139 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 139 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 101 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
R 68003
D 26000
Total 99003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (102)
Member Party Vote
Wood (D) — Yea
Corey Harbison — Yea
Cynthia Almond — Yea
John W. Rogers — Yea
Randall Shedd — Yea
Adline Clarke D Yea
Anthony Daniels D Yea
Artis 'A.J.' McCampbell D Yea
Barbara Boyd D Yea
Barbara Drummond D Yea
Berry Forte D Yea
Chris England D Yea
Curtis Travis D Yea
Jeremy Gray D Yea
Juandalynn Givan D Yea
Kelvin Lawrence D Yea
Kenyatté Hassell D Yea
Laura Hall D Yea
M. Moore D Yea
Napoleon Bracy D Yea
Neil Rafferty D Yea
Ontario Tillman D Yea
Patrice McClammy D Yea
Patrick Sellers D Yea
Pebblin W. Warren D Yea
Phillip Ensler D Yea
Prince Chestnut D Yea
Rolanda Hollis D Yea
Sam Jones D Yea
TaShina Morris D Yea
Thomas Jackson D Yea
Alan Baker R Yea
Allen Treadaway R Yea
Andy Whitt R Yea
Arnold Mooney R Yea
Ben Harrison R Yea
Ben Robbins R Yea
Bill Lamb R Yea
Bob Fincher R Yea
Brett Easterbrook R Not Voting
Chad Robertson R Yea
Chip Brown R Yea
Chris Blackshear R Yea
Chris Pringle R Yea
Chris Sells R Yea
Corley Ellis R Yea
Craig Lipscomb R Yea
Danny Crawford R Yea
Danny Garrett R Yea
David Faulkner R Yea
David Standridge R Yea
Donna Givens R Yea
Ed Oliver R Yea
Ernie Yarbrough R Yea
Frances Holk-Jones R Yea
Ginny Shaver R Yea
Ivan Smith R Yea
James Lomax R Not Voting
Jamie Kiel R Yea
Jeff Sorrells R Yea
Jennifer Fidler R Yea
Jerry Starnes R Yea
Jim Carns R Yea
Jim Hill R Yea
Joe Lovvorn R Yea
Kenneth Paschal R Yea
Kerry (Bubba) Underwood R Yea
Leigh Hulsey R Yea
Mack Butler R Yea
Marcus Paramore R Yea
Margie Wilcox R Yea
Mark Gidley R Yea
Mark Shirey R Yea
Matt Simpson R Yea
Matt Woods R Yea
Matthew Hammett R Yea
Mike Kirkland R Yea
Mike Shaw R Yea
Nathaniel Ledbetter R Yea
Parker Moore R Yea
Paul W. Lee R Yea
Phillip Pettus R Yea
Phillip Rigsby R Yea
Randy Wood R Yea
Reed Ingram R Yea
Rex Reynolds R Yea
Rhett Marques R Yea
Rick Rehm R Yea
Ritchie Whorton R Yea
Ron Bolton R Yea
Russell Bedsole R Yea
Scott Stadthagen R Yea
Shane Stringer R Yea
Steve Clouse R Yea
Steve Hurst R Yea
Susan DuBose R Yea
Terri Collins R Yea
Tim Wadsworth R Yea
Tracy Estes R Not Voting
Troy Stubbs R Yea
Wes Kitchens R Yea
William Brock Colvin R Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
R 24001
D 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 33001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (34)

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
R 24001
D 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 33001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (34)

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
R 24001
D 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 33001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (34)

Official roll call →

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
R 24001
D 8000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 33001
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (34)

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 159 do?
Highways, roads and bridges, contracts for construction, repair or maintenance, awarding authority defined, contractors immune from civil liability if compliant with contract and accepted by awarding authority.
Who sponsors SB 159?
SB 159 is sponsored by Scofield.
What is the current status of SB 159?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 04, 2023. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 159?
Track SB 159 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 159

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 159

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →