Relating to livestock; to amend Section 3-5-2, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide that no municipal governing...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 147 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 147.
You're tracking SB 147
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 147 — Relating to livestock; to amend Section 3-5-2, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide that no municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive that prohibits a person from permitting their livestock or animals to run at large on the premises of another or public land which does not require the same mens rea as state law; and to make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.
Last action — Enacted as 2023-42
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 04, 2023. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Livestock, to provide municipal directives may not be inconsistent, defines inconsistent
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
105 added · 83 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes made to SB 147 clarify that local governments in Alabama cannot create rules that prohibit livestock from running at large unless those rules require individuals to have the same level of intent as state law. Previously, state law allowed for penalties based on different mental states such as negligence or recklessness. This matters because it standardizes how such cases are handled across the state, ensuring that individuals are treated equally under local ordinances and state regulations. Additionally, the bill includes technical updates to improve the language of the law.
SB147 INTRODUCEDENROLLED 024L66-1024L66-2 By SenatorSenators SessionsSessions, Williams, Price, Allen, Givhan, Albritton, Elliott, Chambliss, Roberts, Scofield, Chesteen, Kelley, Bell, Waggoner, Hovey, Barfoot, Carnley, Butler, Gudger, Melson, Shelnutt, Jones, Reed, Weaver, Livingston, Hatcher, Stewart, Singleton RFD:
04-Apr-23 Page 0 024L66-1SB147 02/23/2023Enrolled ZAKEnrolled, (L)crAn 2023-174Act, 23 4Relating SYNOPSIS:to livestock;
Underto existingamend law,Section a3-5-2, personCode isof guiltyAlabama of1975, to provide that no municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive that prohibits a person from permitting their livestock or animals to run at large inon the State of Alabama upon the premises of another or public landsland ifwhich theydoes donot sorequire knowingly,the voluntarily,same negligently,mens orrea willfully.as state law;
This bill would provide that no municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive that prohibits this same conduct but does not require the same mental state as state law.
This bill would also make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Relating to livestock;
to amend Section 3-5-2, Code of Alabama 1975, to provide that no municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive that prohibits a person from permitting their livestock or animals to run at large on the premises of Page 1 SB147 INTRODUCED another or public land which does not require the same mens rea as state law;
(b) Nothing in this section or elsewhere in this chapter shall be construed to make it unlawful for livestock or other animals to run at large on the premises of another when the owner or person in charge of the premises has consented in writing to let allow livestock or other animals to run at large on the same or to subject the owner of such livestock or other animals to criminal prosecution therefor Page 1 SB147 Enrolled premises.
(d) Any person or persons owning or having the possession, custody, or control of any livestock who unlawfully and knowingly permit the same to run or be at Page 2 SB147 INTRODUCED large, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, on conviction, shall be fined not less than double the damages sustained by the injured party or parties, but in no case more than $50.00 fifty dollars ($50), one half of such fine to go to the injured party or parties, and may also be imprisoned in the county jail or sentenced to hard labor for the county for a term not exceeding six months at the discretion of the court trying the case.
Page 32 SB147 Enrolled ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB147 Senate 06-Apr-23 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate.
Patrick Harris, Secretary.
House of Representatives Passed:
18-Apr-23 By:
Senator Sessions Page 3
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits municipal governing bodies from enacting ordinances that impose different mental state requirements for allowing livestock to run at large compared to state law.
-
Section 3-5-2
No municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive that is inconsistent with this section.→ No municipal governing body may adopt or continue in effect any ordinance, rule, resolution, or other directive that is inconsistent with this section.This change updates the wording but retains the existing prohibition on conflicting municipal laws.
-
Section 3-5-2
an ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive shall be considered inconsistent with this section if it proscribes the same conduct prohibited by this section and provides no requisite mental state or a mental state different than what is provided in subsection (a) or (d).→ an ordinance, rule, resolution, or directive shall be considered inconsistent with this section if it proscribes the same conduct prohibited by this section and provides no requisite mental state or a mental state different than what is provided in subsection (a) or (d).This change is nonsubstantive; it maintains the criteria for determining inconsistency with state law.
Action History
-
Enrolled
Sponsors
- David Sessions · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| R | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (102)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| D | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Yea |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Yea |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Yea |
| Merika Coleman | D | Yea |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Yea |
| William M. Beasley | D | Not Voting |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Yea |
| Arthur Orr | R | Yea |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Yea |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Yea |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Yea |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Not Voting |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Yea |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Yea |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 147 do?
- Livestock, to provide municipal directives may not be inconsistent, defines inconsistent
- Who sponsors SB 147?
- SB 147 is sponsored by David Sessions (R).
- What is the current status of SB 147?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced April 04, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 147?
- Track SB 147 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 147
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 147
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →