HB 215 — Relating to consumer credit financing in the sale or lease of motor vehicles; to amend Section 8-37A-4 of the Code of Alabama 1975, as added by Act 2022-179 of the 2022 Regular Session, relating to motor vehicle value protection agreements and the requirements of a provider of the agreements to insure performance of the obligations of the provider; to further clarify the requirements of an insurance policy maintained by the provider for this purpose.
Last action — Reported Favorably (County and Municipal Government)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Motor vehicle value protection agreements, insurance policy of provider required to insure payments of obligations of provider
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill clarifies that the insurance policy for motor vehicle value protection agreements must cover obligations if the provider fails to perform.
-
Section 8-37A-4
the obligations of a provider under any motor vehicle value protection agreements of the provider in the event the provider fails to perform its obligations.→ the obligations of a provider under any motor vehicle value protection agreements of the provider in the event the provider fails to perform its obligations. The insurance policy shall be issued by an insurer licensed, registered, or otherwise authorized to do business in this state at the time the policy is filed with the Commissioner of Insurance and continuously thereafter, that meets one of the following criteria:It expands on the requirements for the insurance policy that providers must have in place.
Action History
-
Read Second Time in Second House
Sponsors
- Reed Ingram · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| D | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 100 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (102)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 215 do?
- Motor vehicle value protection agreements, insurance policy of provider required to insure payments of obligations of provider
- Who sponsors HB 215?
- HB 215 is sponsored by Reed Ingram (R).
- What is the current status of HB 215?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 215?
- Track HB 215 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 215
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 215
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →