HB 113 — Relating to Limestone County; to establish a service of process fee for the service or attempted service of documents by the Limestone County Sheriff's Office in the civil division of the circuit and district courts; to establish a fingerprint fee for fingerprinting certain persons and a local background check fee; to ratify and confirm fingerprint fees and local background check fees collected prior to the effective date of this act; and to provide for a booking fee to be imposed on each person booked into the Limestone County Jail and subsequently convicted of a crime, the collection of the fees, and for the distribution of the revenues derived from the fees.
Last action — Enacted as 2023-172
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2023. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill establishes multiple fees related to law enforcement services in Limestone County.
This legislation sets fees for process service, fingerprinting, and booking in Limestone County. It also ratifies previously collected fees.
What this means for you
- {}: {}
- Workers: Workers may be affected by the fingerprint and background check fees if their employment requires a background check in Limestone County.
- Families: Families may face additional costs related to legal processes if they require service of process or background checks.
Summary
Limestone County, sheriff, service of process fee, fingerprint fee, background check fee, and booking fee, authorized, deposit in sheriff's fund, certain prior fees validated
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
156 added · 133 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HB 113 include the introduction of a service of process fee, fingerprint fee, and a local background check fee, all specifically for Limestone County. Additionally, the bill now includes a booking fee that will be imposed on individuals booked into the Limestone County Jail and later convicted of a crime. These changes are important because they outline how the county will collect fees for certain services and how those funds will be managed, potentially impacting local budgeting and law enforcement resources.
HB113 INTRODUCEDENROLLED XDRJ7Z-1XDRJ7Z-3 By Representatives Crawford, Whitt, Rigsby, Moore (P), Harrison (N & P) RFD:
21-Mar-23 Page2023 0Regular XDRJ7Z-1Session 02/02/2023Page FC0 (L)maHB113 2023-226Enrolled 2Enrolled, 4An AAct, BILL3 TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 8 Relating to Limestone County;
Section 2.(a) In addition to all other charges, fees, judgments, and costs of court in the civil division of the district and circuit courts of Limestone County, a service of process fee of up to fifty dollars ($50) shall be assessed and collected for service or attempted service of process by the Page 1 HB113 INTRODUCED Limestone County Sheriff's Office on each delivery requiring personal service of process.
(b) In addition to all other charges, fees, judgments, and costs of court, a service of process fee of up to seventy-five dollars ($75) shall be assessed and collected for service or attempted service of process by the Limestone County Sheriff's Office Page 1 HB113 Enrolled for matters pending or to be commenced in a court outside of this state.
The search shall not include national or state databases of Page 2 HB113 INTRODUCED criminal records.
(c) The amount of the fingerprint fee and the fee for a local background check provided for in subsection (a) and (b) Page 2 HB113 Enrolled shall be set by the sheriff with approval of the county commission.
(3) The revenues derived from the booking fee shall be deposited in the Limestone County Sheriff’s Office Law Enforcement Fund to be used by the Sheriff of Limestone County Page 3 HB113 INTRODUCED for salaries, training, operational expenses, or other law enforcement uses as determined by the sheriff to best meet the needs of his or her agency.
(4) In any case where the booking fee is not paid, the Page 3 HB113 Enrolled district attorney of the county may assist in the collection of the fees in the same manner as court—ordered monies.
95 (5) The sheriff may withhold funds equal to the amount of the booking fee from any funds held while an individual is incarcerated in the Limestone County Jail and those funds may be applied toward any assessment of a booking fee pursuant to this section.
Any funds withheld shall be repaid to the defendant if no conviction results after dismissal of all 95 charges or acquittal.
Page 4 HB113 INTRODUCED Section 6.
Any actions of the sheriff or the sheriff's office prior to the effective date of this act in the charging and collecting of any fingerprint fees for fingerprinting Page 4 HB113 Enrolled persons by the sheriff's office and for local background checks by the sheriff's office, the payment of the fees to the Sheriff's Law Enforcement Fund in Limestone County, and the expenditure of any of the funds for law enforcement purposes prior to the effective date of this act are ratified, validated, and confirmed.
Page 5 HB113 Enrolled ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate House of Representatives I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and was passed by the House 06-Apr-23, as amended.
John Treadwell Clerk Senate 03-May-23 Passed Page 6
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Enrolled
Sponsors
- Danny Crawford · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 17 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| D | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 0% | 0% | 32% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Yea |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Yea |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Not Voting |
| Merika Coleman | D | Yea |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Not Voting |
| William M. Beasley | D | Not Voting |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Not Voting |
| Arthur Orr | R | Not Voting |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Yea |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Not Voting |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Not Voting |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Not Voting |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Not Voting |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Not Voting |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| R | 24 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Total | 26 | 0 | 0 | 76 |
| % of votes cast | 25% | 0% | 0% | 75% |
How each member voted (102)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| R | 20 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| D | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 81 |
| % of votes cast | 21% | 0% | 0% | 79% |
How each member voted (102)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 113 do?
- Limestone County, sheriff, service of process fee, fingerprint fee, background check fee, and booking fee, authorized, deposit in sheriff's fund, certain prior fees validated
- Who sponsors HB 113?
- HB 113 is sponsored by Danny Crawford (R).
- What is the current status of HB 113?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 21, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 113?
- Track HB 113 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 113
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 113
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →