Filing fees, not required for certain qualified domestic relations orders
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 84 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 84.
You're tracking SB 84
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 84 — Filing fees, not required for certain qualified domestic relations orders
Last action — Enacted
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 20, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Kay Ivey (Republican) on May 20, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Courts & Judges
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
185 added · 168 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 84 eliminates the $248 filing fee for certain motions related to qualified domestic relations orders if they are submitted within 120 days of a final order. This change makes it easier and more affordable for individuals to modify or enforce existing domestic relations orders without incurring additional costs. It’s an important step toward reducing financial barriers for families navigating the court system during sensitive times. Additionally, the bill includes minor updates to the language for clarity and consistency.
SB84 INTRODUCEDENROLLED SB84 4CSEI3I-14CSEI3I-2 By Senators Bell, Orr RFD:
08-Feb-24 Page 0 4CSEI3I-1SB84 01/30/2024Enrolled GPEnrolled, (L)lgAn 2023-2998Act, 23 4Relating SYNOPSIS:to filing fees;
Under existing law, there is a two hundred forty-eight dollar ($248) filing fee for cases filed in the domestic relations docket of the circuit court seeking to modify or enforce an existing domestic relations court order.
This bill would provide that no filing fee is required if a motion for a qualified domestic relations order is filed within 120 days of the final order.
This bill would also make nonsubstantive, technical revisions to update the existing code language to current style.
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Relating to filing fees;
Page 1 SB84 INTRODUCED Section 1.
Page 1 SB84 Enrolled provided, however, if attorney fees have been allowed by applicable state law or contract, the amount of these fees shall be added to the amount of the matter in controversy above in determining the jurisdictional amount.
provided, however, if attorney fees have Page 2 SB84 INTRODUCED been allowed by applicable state law or contract, the amount of these fees shall be added to the amount of the matter in controversy above in determining the jurisdictional amount.
However, if any plaintiff files an addendum to increase the damages requested to an amount that exceeds fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), or if the plaintiff fails to specify the amount in the filing, then the fee shall Page 2 SB84 Enrolled be two hundred ninety-seven dollars ($297) and distributed as provided for in subdivision (4) of Section 12-19-72.
(6) One hundred forty-five dollars ($145) for cases filed on the domestic relations docket of the circuit court in Page 3 SB84 INTRODUCED which the circuit clerk determines that the cases are contested at the time of filing.
For the purposes of this section, the term "qualified domestic relations order" has the 95 same meaning as 26 U.S.C.
(9) Two hundred ninety-seven dollars ($297) on a motion or complaint to appear as an intervenor or a third party Page 3 SB84 Enrolled plaintiff in a civil action of the circuit court other than cases filed on the domestic relations docket of the circuit court.
A default judgment pursuant to Rule 55(b), Page95 4 SB84 INTRODUCED Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure;
Page 4 SB84 Enrolled (12) In addition to the filing fees provided in subdivision (4), an additional one hundred dollars ($100) shall be charged for each additional plaintiff in those cases filed;
Nothing in this subdivision shall Page 5 SB84 INTRODUCED be interpreted as establishing a maximum number of plaintiffs.
(d) Nothing in Act 2004-636 shall limit a judge's authority to allow a civil case to proceed at no cost to a party upon the judge's approval of an affidavit of substantial Page 5 SB84 Enrolled hardship." Section 2.
Page 6 SB84 Enrolled ________________________________________________ President and Presiding Officer of the Senate ________________________________________________ Speaker of the House of Representatives SB84 Senate 15-Feb-24 I hereby certify that the within Act originated in and passed the Senate.
Patrick Harris, Secretary.
House of Representatives Passed:
08-May-24 By:
Senator Bell Page 7
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill eliminates filing fees for certain motions related to qualified domestic relations orders filed within 120 days of the final order.
-
Section 12-19-71
b. No filing fee may be collected for a motion for a qualified domestic relations order that is filed within 120 days of the date of the final order.→ b. No filing fee may be collected for a motion for a qualified domestic relations order that is filed within 120 days of the date of the final order.No filing fee is required for specific motions during a designated time period.
Action History
-
Enacted
Sponsors
- Lance Bell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 102 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (103)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| R | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| D | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 102 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (103)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| D | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Yea |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Not Voting |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Yea |
| Merika Coleman | D | Not Voting |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Yea |
| William M. Beasley | D | Yea |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Yea |
| Arthur Orr | R | Yea |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Not Voting |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Not Voting |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Yea |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Yea |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Yea |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Yea |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Wes Kitchens | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| D | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (35)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Greg J. Reed | — | Yea |
| Bobby D. Singleton | D | Yea |
| Kirk Hatcher | D | Not Voting |
| Linda Coleman-Madison | D | Yea |
| Merika Coleman | D | Not Voting |
| Robert Stewart | D | Yea |
| Rodger M. Smitherman | D | Yea |
| Vivian Davis Figures | D | Yea |
| William M. Beasley | D | Yea |
| Andrew Jones | R | Yea |
| April Weaver | R | Yea |
| Arthur Orr | R | Yea |
| Chris Elliott | R | Yea |
| Clyde Chambliss | R | Yea |
| Dan Roberts | R | Yea |
| David Sessions | R | Yea |
| Donnie Chesteen | R | Not Voting |
| Garlan Gudger | R | Yea |
| Gerald H. Allen | R | Yea |
| Greg Albritton | R | Not Voting |
| J. T. 'Jabo' Waggoner | R | Yea |
| Jack W. Williams | R | Yea |
| Jay Hovey | R | Yea |
| Josh Carnley | R | Yea |
| Keith Kelley | R | Yea |
| Lance Bell | R | Yea |
| Larry Stutts | R | Yea |
| Randy Price | R | Yea |
| Sam Givhan | R | Yea |
| Shay Shelnutt | R | Yea |
| Steve Livingston | R | Yea |
| Tim Melson | R | Yea |
| Tom Butler | R | Yea |
| Wes Kitchens | R | Yea |
| Will Barfoot | R | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 84 do?
- Courts & Judges
- Who sponsors SB 84?
- SB 84 is sponsored by Lance Bell (R).
- What is the current status of SB 84?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 20, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 84?
- Track SB 84 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 84
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 84
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →