Criminal procedure; split sentence authorized for 30 year sentence
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 63 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 63.
You're tracking HB 63
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 63 — Criminal procedure; split sentence authorized for 30 year sentence
Last action — Reported Out of Committee Second House
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Criminal Procedure
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
133 added · 117 removedPlain-language change summary
The bill HB 63 has been amended to allow judges to split the sentences of offenders who receive a prison term of 30 years or less, rather than the previous limit of 20 years. This change provides judges with more flexibility in sentencing, which can help tailor punishments to fit individual circumstances and potentially reduce overcrowding in prisons. By extending this option, the bill aims to promote more rehabilitative approaches within the justice system.
HB63 INTRODUCEDENGROSSED HB63 7C1W2E2-136HPEEV-2 By Representative Hill RFD:
30-Jan-24 Page 0 7C1W2E2-1HB63 01/11/2024Engrossed CNB2 (L)bm4 2024-63A 2BILL 4TO SYNOPSIS:BE ENTITLED AN ACT 9 Relating to criminal procedure;
Under existing law, a judge may split the sentence of an offender who has received a sentence of 20 years of less.
This bill would allow for a judge to split the sentence of an offender who receives a sentence of 30 years of less.
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT Relating to criminal procedure;
"§15-18-8 (a) When a defendant is convicted of an offense, other than a sex offense involving a child as defined in Section 15-20A-4, that constitutes is a Class A or Class B felony Page 1 HB63 INTRODUCED offense, and receives a sentence of 2030 years or less, the judge presiding over the case may order:
(1) In cases where the defendant is convicted of a Class A, Class B, Class C, or Class D felony and the imposed sentence is not more than 15 years, that the convicted defendant be confined in a prison, jail-type institution, or treatment institution for a period not exceeding three years, that the execution of the remainder of the sentence be Page 1 HB63 Engrossed suspended notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary, and that the defendant be placed on probation for a period as determined by the court.
(3) In cases where the defendant is convicted of a Class A, Class B, or Class C felony and the imposed sentence is greater than 20 years but not more than 30 years, that the convicted defendant be confined in a prison, jail-type institution, or treatment institution for a minimum period notof exceeding10 20 years, that the execution of the remainder of the sentence be suspended notwithstanding any provision of the law to the contrary, and that the defendant be placed on probation Page 2 HB63 INTRODUCED for a period as determined by the court.
Notwithstanding subsection (c), the court shall not suspend or alter the minimum period of confinement ordered.
If an offense is punishable by Page 2 HB63 Engrossed both fine and imprisonment, the court may impose a fine and place the defendant on probation as to imprisonment.
Page 3 HB63 INTRODUCED (e) Except as otherwise provided pursuant to Section 15-18-64, the defendant's liability for any fine or other punishment imposed as to which probation is granted shall be fully discharged by the fulfillment of the terms and conditions of probation.
(f) During any term of probation, the defendant shall Page 3 HB63 Engrossed report to the probation authorities at a time and place as directed by the judge imposing the sentence.
(g) No defendant serving a minimum period of confinement ordered under subsection (a) or (h) shall be 95 entitled to parole or to deductions from his or her sentence under the Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act, during the minimum period of confinement so ordered;
provided, however, that this subsection shall not be construed to prohibit application of the Alabama Correctional Incentive Time Act to any period of confinement which may be required after the 95 defendant has served the minimum period.
This act shall become effective on October Page 4 HB63 INTRODUCED 1, 2024.
Page 54 HB63 Engrossed House of Representatives Read for the first time and referred ................06-Feb-24 to the House of Representatives committee on Judiciary Read for the second time and placed ................21-Feb-24 on the calendar:
1 amendment Read for the third time and passed ................23-Apr-24 as amended Yeas 60 Nays 34 Abstains 5 John Treadwell Clerk Page 5
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
Sponsors
- Jim Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on · 34 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Jim Hill R
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| R | 53 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
| D | 27 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 82 | 14 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 14% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (103)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| R | 32 | 34 | 0 | 5 |
| D | 26 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 60 | 34 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 33% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (103)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| R | 45 | 20 | 0 | 6 |
| D | 23 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Total | 70 | 20 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 19% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (103)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 63 do?
- Criminal Procedure
- Who sponsors HB 63?
- HB 63 is sponsored by Jim Hill (R).
- What is the current status of HB 63?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 63?
- Track HB 63 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 63
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 63
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →