Board of Pharmacy, compounding pharmacies, number of pharmacy techs reg by board rule
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 52 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 52.
You're tracking HB 52
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 52 — Board of Pharmacy, compounding pharmacies, number of pharmacy techs reg by board rule
Last action — Read for the first time and referred to the Senate Committee on Healthcare
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Pharmacy Board
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the requirements for the number of pharmacy technicians allowed during compounding to align with the Board of Pharmacy's supervisory ratios.
-
Section 34-23-151
there shall be no more than three technicians per pharmacist→ the number of pharmacy technicians shall comply with the ratios for supervision as provided by rule of the board.The bill removes the fixed limit of three technicians per pharmacist and allows the Board of Pharmacy to set technician-to-pharmacist ratios.
Action History
-
Pending Committee Action in Second House
Sponsors
- Phillip Rigsby · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 139 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (139)
139 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 139 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| D | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (103)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R | 69 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| D | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 100 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (103)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 52 do?
- Pharmacy Board
- Who sponsors HB 52?
- HB 52 is sponsored by Phillip Rigsby (R).
- What is the current status of HB 52?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 52?
- Track HB 52 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 52
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 52
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →