An act relating to changes that affect the revenue of the State
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H.437 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H.437.
You're tracking H.437
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H.437 — An act relating to changes that affect the revenue of the State
Last action — Referred to Committee on Finance per Temporary Senate Rule 44A
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Biennium. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An act relating to changes that affect the revenue of the State
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read H.437 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Finance per Temporary Senate Rule 44A
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Rules
-
Passed
-
Which was agreed to
-
Rep. Long of Newfane moved to suspend Rule 78 to permit reconsideration immediately
-
Point of order ruled well taken
-
Rep. Donahue of Northfield raised a Point of Order
-
Division results 94 Yes, 45 No
-
Read Third time and passed
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 146 to Pass -- Yeas = 95, Nays = 51
-
Rep. Burditt of West Rutland demanded yeas and nays
-
Amendment as offered by Rep. Scheuermann of Stowe disagreed to
-
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 74 of 147 to Pass -- Yeas = 53, Nays = 94
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Scheuermann of Stowe moved to amend the bill
-
Rep. Kornheiser of Brattleboro spoke for the Committee on Ways and Means
-
Read Second time
-
Committee bill read the first time and placed on Notice Calendar on March 24, 2021
Sponsors
- House Committee on Ways and Means · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 189 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- House Committee on Ways and Means
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (189)
189 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 189 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H.437 do?
- An act relating to changes that affect the revenue of the State
- Who sponsors H.437?
- H.437 is sponsored by House Committee on Ways and Means.
- What is the current status of H.437?
- This bill died with 2022 Biennium. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H.437?
- Track H.437 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H.437
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H.437
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →