An act relating to establishing a forensic facility
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S.89 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S.89.
You're tracking S.89
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S.89 — An act relating to establishing a forensic facility
Last action — Senate Message: Signed by Governor May 30, 2023
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 16, 2023. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An act relating to establishing a forensic facility
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S.89 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Senate Message: Signed by Governor May 30, 2023
-
Signed by Governor on Tuesday, May 30, 2023
-
Delivered to Governor on Wednesday, May 24, 2023
-
As passed by Senate and House
-
House message: House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Notice Calendar: Senate Proposal of Amendment
-
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment thereto
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment as moved by Senator(s) Sears and Lyons
-
House proposal of amendment; text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House proposal of amendment
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Read third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill placed in all remaining stages of passage as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Report of Committee on Judiciary, as amended, agreed to
-
Rep. Notte of Rutland City moved to amend the report of the Committee on Judiciary, which was agreed to
-
Rep. Bluemle of Burlington recommended for the Committee on Appropriations
-
Rep. Taylor of Colchester recommended for the Committee on Ways and Means
-
Rep. Notte of Rutland City reported for the Committee on Judiciary
-
Read second time
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
-
Referred to Committee on Ways and Means per Rule 35(a)
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary
-
Read 3rd time & passed
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered
-
Recommendation of amendment agreed to
-
Recommendation of amendment by Senator(s) Lyons, Gulick, Hardy, Weeks, and Williams, text
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary agreed to
-
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator Sears for Committee on Judiciary
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Judiciary
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Judiciary
Sponsors
- Sen. Richard Sears Jr. · Primary
- Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons · Primary
- Philip E Baruth · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 187 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Sen. Richard Sears Jr.
- Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons Democrat
- Philip E Baruth Democrat/Progressive
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (187)
187 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 187 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S.89 do?
- An act relating to establishing a forensic facility
- Who sponsors S.89?
- S.89 is sponsored by Sen. Richard Sears Jr., Virginia "Ginny" V Lyons (Democrat), and Philip E Baruth (Democrat/Progressive).
- What is the current status of S.89?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 16, 2023. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track S.89?
- Track S.89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S.89
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S.89
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →