An act relating to compensation and benefits for members of the Vermont General Assembly
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S.39 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S.39.
You're tracking S.39
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S.39 — An act relating to compensation and benefits for members of the Vermont General Assembly
Last action — Recommitted to Committee on Government Operations on motion of Senator Baruth
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Biennium. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An act relating to compensation and benefits for members of the Vermont General Assembly
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read S.39 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Recommitted to Committee on Government Operations on motion of Senator Baruth
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
Vetoed by Governor & placed on notice calendar for June 20, 2023
-
Governor vetoed bill
-
Senate Message: Vetoed by Governor May 31, 2023
-
Governor vetoed bill on Wednesday, May 31, 2023
-
Delivered to Governor on Friday, May 26, 2023
-
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
Rules suspended & action messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
As passed by Senate and House
-
House proposal of amendment concurred in
-
House proposal of amendment; text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House message: House passed bill in concurrence with proposal(s) of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Read third time and passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Which was disagreed to
-
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 73 of 145 to Pass -- Yeas = 35, Nays = 110
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden moved to amend the House proposal of amend
-
Rep. Donahue of Northfield moved to amend the House proposal of amendment, which was agreed to
-
Rep. Donahue of Northfield moved to amend the House proposal of amendment, which was agreed to
-
Action Calendar: Third Reading
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 73 of 146 to Pass -- Yeas = 102, Nays = 44
-
Rep. Logan of Burlington demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden moved to amend the House proposal of amendment, which was disagreed to
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden moved to amend the House proposal of amendment, which was agreed to
-
Which was disagreed to
-
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 72 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 40, Nays = 104
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Harrison of Chittenden moved to amend the House proposal of amend
-
Which was disagreed to
-
Roll Call Results Failed -- Needed 73 of 146 to Pass -- Yeas = 34, Nays = 112
-
Rep. Peterson of Clarendon demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Peterson of Clarendon moved to amend the House proposal of amend
-
Report of Committee on Government Operations and Military Affairs agreed to
-
Rep. Bluemle of Burlington recommended for the Committee on Appropriations
-
Rep. Nugent of South Burlington reported for the Committee on Government Operations and Military Affairs
-
Read second time
-
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Rule 35(a)
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Military Affairs
-
Read 3rd time & passed on division Yeas 18, Nays 9
-
New Business/Third Reading
-
3rd reading ordered on roll call, requested by Senator Mazza, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 19, Nays = 10
-
Senator McCormack explained vote
-
Senator Chittenden explained vote
-
Recommendation of amendment, as amended, agreed to on roll call requested by Senator Mazza, Passed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 19, Nays = 10
-
Motion disagreed to
-
Senator(s) Ingalls motion to amend recommendation of amendment; text
-
Recommendation of amendment by Committee on Government Operations amended as recommended by Committee on Appropriations
-
Reported favorably by Senator Baruth for Committee on Appropriations with recommendation of amendment
-
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with recommendation of amendment by Senator White for Committee on Government Operations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Government Operations
-
New Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Government Operations
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Rules per Temporary Senate Rule 44A
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Government Operations
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
-
Favorable report with recommendation of amendment by Committee on Government Operations
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Government Operations
Sponsors
- Alison Clarkson · Primary
- Kesha K Ram Hinsdale · Cosponsor
- Robert W Norris · Cosponsor
- Nader A Hashim · Cosponsor
- Martine Larocque L Gulick · Cosponsor
- Ruth E Hardy · Primary
- Rebecca "Becca" E White · Cosponsor
- Anne E Watson · Cosponsor
- Tanya C Vyhovsky · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Alison Clarkson Democrat
- Ruth E Hardy Democrat
Co-sponsors (7)
- Kesha K Ram Hinsdale Democrat
- Robert W Norris Republican
- Nader A Hashim Democrat
- Martine Larocque L Gulick Democrat
- Rebecca "Becca" E White Democrat
- Anne E Watson Democrat/Progressive
- Tanya C Vyhovsky Progressive/Democrat
Not signed on (181)
181 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 181 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S.39 do?
- An act relating to compensation and benefits for members of the Vermont General Assembly
- Who sponsors S.39?
- S.39 is sponsored by Alison Clarkson (Democrat), Kesha K Ram Hinsdale (Democrat), Robert W Norris (Republican), Nader A Hashim (Democrat), Martine Larocque L Gulick (Democrat), Ruth E Hardy (Democrat), Rebecca "Becca" E White (Democrat), Anne E Watson (Democrat/Progressive), and Tanya C Vyhovsky (Progressive/Democrat).
- What is the current status of S.39?
- This bill died with 2024 Biennium. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track S.39?
- Track S.39 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S.39
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S.39
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →