An act relating to enhancing consumer privacy and the age-appropriate design code
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H.121 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H.121.
You're tracking H.121
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H.121 — An act relating to enhancing consumer privacy and the age-appropriate design code
Last action — Senate Message: Governor's veto sustained
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Biennium. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
An act relating to enhancing consumer privacy and the age-appropriate design code
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read H.121 on the official Vermont source →Action History
-
Senate Message: Governor's veto sustained
-
Veto of the Governor sustained on a roll call Yeas = 14, Nays = 15
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House message: Bill passed, the veto of the Governor notwithstanding
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Veto of the Governor overridden by a vote of Yeas = 128, Nays = 17
-
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 97 of 145 to Pass -- Yeas = 128, Nays = 17
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Notice Calendar: Governor’s Veto
-
House message: Governor vetoed bill on June 13, 2024
-
Vetoed by the Governor on June 13, 2024
-
Delivered to the Governor on June 7, 2024
-
House message: House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment
-
Senate proposal of amendment to House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment concurred in
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Senate Message: House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment thereto
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House proposal of amendment concurred in with further proposal of amendment as moved by Senator(s) Ram Hinsdale, Bray, Clarkson, Hashim, and Lyons
-
House proposal of amendment to Senate proposal of amendment, text
-
Rules suspended & taken up for immediate consideration, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
House proposal of amendment
-
House message: House concurred in Senate proposal of amendment with proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. Toof of St. Albans Town
-
Senate proposal of amendment concurred in with further amendment thereto, as offered by Rep. Priestley of Bradford, Carroll of Bennington, Chase of Chester, Duke of Burlington, Graning of Jericho, Jerome of Brandon, Marcotte of Coventry, Nicoll of Ludlow, Sammis of Castleton, White of Bethel, and Williams of Barre City
-
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 71 of 142 to Pass -- Yeas = 139, Nays = 3
-
Rep. Chase of Chester demanded yeas and nays
-
Rep. Priestley of Bradford, Carroll of Bennington, Chase of Chester, Duke of Burlington, Graning of Jericho, Jerome of Brandon, Marcotte of Coventry, Nicoll of Ludlow, Sammis of Castleton, White of Bethel, and Williams of Barre City moved to concur in the Senate proposal of amendment with a further amendment thereto
-
Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
-
Notice Calendar: Senate Proposal of Amendment
-
Senate Message: Passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
Read 3rd time & passed in concurrence with proposal of amendment
-
Proposal of amendment agreed to
-
Pending third reading, motion to amend Senate proposal of amendment offered by Senator(s) Ram Hinsdale
-
Rules suspended & bill placed on all remaining stages of passage, on motion of Senator Baruth
-
3rd reading ordered
-
Proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs, as amended, agreed to
-
Remaining (2,3,5,6) instances of amendment agreed to
-
1st instance of amend. disagreed to on division Yeas=14, Nays-15
-
2nd division of amendment further divided by Sen. Ram Hinsdale, taking 1st instance of amend. 1st
-
Floor amendment divided at request of Senator Ram Hinsdale
-
Roll Call, requested by Senator Sears, Failed -- Needed 15 of 29 to Pass -- Yeas = 13, Nays = 16
-
1st division of amendment (4th instance of the proposal of amendment) disagreed to.
-
1st division of amendment-4th instance of amend., 2nd division of amendment-instances 1-3,5,6
-
Floor amendment divided at request of Senator Sears
-
Proposal of amendment by Senator(s) Lyons, Gulick, and Hardy; text
-
Reported favorably by Senator Perchlik for Committee on Appropriations
-
Read 2nd time, reported favorably with proposal of amendment by Senator Ram Hinsdale for Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Unfinished Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
New Business/Second Reading
-
Favorable report by Committee on Appropriations
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Referred to Committee on Appropriations per Senate Rule 31
-
Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Second Reading
-
Entered on Notice Calendar
-
Read 1st time & referred to Committee on Economic Development, Housing and General Affairs
-
Passed
-
Roll Call Results Passed -- Needed 70 of 139 to Pass -- Yeas = 139, Nays = 0
-
Rep. Marcotte of Coventry demanded yeas and nays
-
Read third time
-
Action Calendar: Third Reading
-
Third Reading ordered
-
Report of Committee on Commerce and Economic Development, as amended, agreed to
-
Rep. Andriano of Orwell moved to amend the report of the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development, which was agreed to
-
Rep. Priestley of Bradford reported for the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
-
Read second time
-
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Rep. Priestley of Bradford moved to postpone action until 03/21/2024
-
Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
-
Read first time and referred to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
Sponsors
- Rep. James Carroll · Cosponsor
- Rep. Stephanie Jerome · Cosponsor
- Rep. Emma Mulvaney-Stanak · Cosponsor
- Rep. Logan Nicoll · Cosponsor
- Rep. Jarrod Sammis · Cosponsor
- Kirk White · Cosponsor
- Monique Priestley · Cosponsor
- Edye Graning · Cosponsor
- Michael J Marcotte · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michael J Marcotte Republican
Co-sponsors (8)
- Rep. James Carroll
- Rep. Stephanie Jerome
- Rep. Emma Mulvaney-Stanak
- Rep. Logan Nicoll
- Rep. Jarrod Sammis
- Kirk White Democrat
- Monique Priestley Democrat
- Edye Graning Democrat
Not signed on (181)
181 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 181 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H.121 do?
- An act relating to enhancing consumer privacy and the age-appropriate design code
- Who sponsors H.121?
- H.121 is sponsored by Rep. James Carroll, Rep. Stephanie Jerome, Rep. Emma Mulvaney-Stanak, Rep. Logan Nicoll, Rep. Jarrod Sammis, Kirk White (Democrat), Monique Priestley (Democrat), Edye Graning (Democrat), and Michael J Marcotte (Republican).
- What is the current status of H.121?
- This bill died with 2024 Biennium. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track H.121?
- Track H.121 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H.121
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H.121
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →