Relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 5595 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 5595.
You're tracking HB 5595
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 5595 — Relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.
Last action — Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker: Apr 7 2025 5:28PM
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 5595 on the official Texas source →Compared against the Texas statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 2 section(s) of the Texas statutes: Section 153.002, Family Code, Section 156.101, Family Code.
-
Section 153.002, Family Code
(a) (b) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, it is a rebuttable presumption that: (1) a parent acts in the best interest of the parent's child; and (2) it is in the best interest of a child to be in the care, custody, and control of a parent. (c) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, the nonparent may overcome the presumption under Subsection (b) by proving by clear and convincing evidence that denial of the relief requested by the nonparent would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development.
amended
-
Section 156.101, Family Code
(c) Subject to Subsections (d) and (e), in determining the best interest of a child under this section with respect to a request to modify an order to grant possession of or access to the child to a nonparent, the presumption under Section 153.002(b) applies. (d) Except as provided by Subsection (f), in a suit for modification between a parent and a nonparent, the presumption under Section 153.002(b) is rebutted with respect to the parent who is a party to the suit if the order subject to modification: (1) expressly states that the presumption was rebutted with respect to the parent; (2) appoints a nonparent as conservator of the child; (3) subject to Subsection (e), grants a nonparent possession of or access to the child; or (4) is the result of the parent's voluntary relinquishment of the actual care, control, or possession of the child to a nonparent as described by Section 153.373. (e) The presumption under Section 153.002(b) may be rebutted as provided by Subsection (d)(3) only in a suit for modification in which a nonparent seeks possession of or access to the child. The presumption may not be rebutted as provided by that subdivision in a suit for modification in which a nonparent seeks conservatorship of the child. (f) Subsection (d) does not apply: (1) to a temporary order rendered under Section 156.006; or (2) if the order subject to modification expressly states that the parties agree the presumption under Section 153.002(b) is not rebutted.
amended
Action History
-
Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker
-
Read first time
-
Filed
Sponsors
- David Cook · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 5595 do?
- Relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.
- Who sponsors HB 5595?
- HB 5595 is sponsored by David Cook.
- What is the current status of HB 5595?
- This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 5595?
- Track HB 5595 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5595
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5595
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →