Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 4302 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 4302.
You're tracking HB 4302
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 4302 — Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.
Last action — Left pending in committee
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 4302 on the official Texas source →AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 1 section(s) of the Texas statutes: Section 36.2031, Utilities Code.
-
Section 36.2031, Utilities Code
Sec. 36.2031. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT COST RECOVERY; ADJUSTMENT OF VEGETATION MANAGEMENT FACTOR. (a) Section 36.201 does not prohibit the commission from reviewing and providing for adjustments of an electric utility's vegetation management factor. (b) The commission by rule shall implement procedures that provide for the timely adjustment of an electric utility's vegetation management factor. The rules must require that the findings required by Section 36.058 regarding vegetation management transactions with affiliated interests be made in a vegetation management reconciliation proceeding or in a rate case filed under Subchapter C or D. The rules must ensure that: (1) the utility collects as contemporaneously as reasonably possible the vegetation management costs that the utility incurs and that the commission determines are eligible; (2) the total of the utility's eligible vegetation management costs, including any under-collected or over-collected amounts to be recovered through an interim adjustment, is allocated among customer classes based on actual historical calendar month usage; (3) any material balance of amounts under-collected or over-collected for eligible vegetation management costs is collected from or refunded to customers through an interim adjustment: (A) not later than the 90th day after the date the balance is accrued; or (B) if the adjustment would result in a total bill increase of 10 percent or more compared to the total bill in the month before implementation, not later than a date ordered by the commission which must be after the 90th day after the date the balance is accrued; and (4) an affected party will receive notice and have the opportunity to request a hearing before the commission. (c) Notwithstanding Subsection (b)(3), on a finding that an electric utility has an under-collected balance that is the result of extraordinary vegetation management costs that are unlikely to continue, the commission may approve an interim vegetation management adjustment that would defer recovery to take place over a period longer than 90 days. (d) The commission is not required to hold a hearing on the adjustment of an electric utility's vegetation management factor under this section. If the commission holds a hearing, the commission may consider at the hearing any evidence that is appropriate and in the public interest. (e) A customer of the electric utility, a municipality with original jurisdiction over the utility, or the office may protest a vegetation management factor or interim adjustment proposed under this section. The prudence of costs may not be considered in a vegetation management factor or interim adjustment proceeding and may only be considered in a vegetation management reconciliation proceeding under Subsection (h) or another appropriate proceeding. (f) The sole issue that may be considered on a protest of a vegetation management factor under Subsection (e) is whether the factor reasonably reflects costs the electric utility will incur so that the utility will not substantially under-collect or over-collect the utility's reasonably stated vegetation management costs on an ongoing basis. The commission may adjust the utility's vegetation management factor based on its determination on that issue. (g) The commission shall hold a hearing on a protest of an interim adjustment under Subsection (e) if the adjustment would result in a total bill increase of 10 percent or more as described by Subsection (b)(3) or if the adjustment results from extraordinary vegetation management costs as described by Subsection (c). In response to a protest of an interim adjustment, if the commission finds that the electric utility is in a state of material under-collection or over-collection of the utility's reasonably stated eligible vegetation management costs and is projected to remain in that state on an ongoing basis, the commission shall order the utility to establish or modify an interim adjustment to address the
added
Action History
-
Left pending in committee
-
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
-
Committee substitute considered in committee
-
Considered in public hearing
-
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
-
Referred to State Affairs
-
Read first time
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Will Metcalf · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 4302 do?
- Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.
- Who sponsors HB 4302?
- HB 4302 is sponsored by Will Metcalf.
- What is the current status of HB 4302?
- This bill died with 89th Legislature, Regular Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 4302?
- Track HB 4302 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 4302
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 4302
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →