Relating to: residency requirements for certain employees of a local governmental unit. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1181 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1181.
You're tracking SB 1181
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1181 — Relating to: residency requirements for certain employees of a local governmental unit. (FE)
Last action — Fiscal estimate received
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to repeal 64.09 (3); to create 66.0502 (4) (e) and 66.0502 (4) (f) of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill allows certain local governmental units to impose residency requirements on specific employees, including city managers and school district administrators, reversing the existing prohibition on such requirements.
-
64.09(3)
Residence in the city or state shall not be a qualification for the office of city manager.The bill removes the prohibition on residency requirements for city managers.
-
66.0502 (4)(e)
Any of the following bodies may impose on the designated employee a residency requirement that contains the terms and conditions that the body considers appropriate: 1. A police department, fire department, or combined protective services department, on the chief of that department. 2. A city or village, on a city or village administrator. 3. A county without an elected county executive, on a county administrator. 4. A school board, on a school district administrator, as defined in s. 115.001 (8).
The bill introduces a provision allowing various local governmental bodies to impose residency requirements on specific employees.
-
66.0502 (4)(f)
A city or village that has elected, or is in the process of electing, a city manager under s. 64.09 may impose on the city manager a residency requirement that contains terms and conditions that the city or village considers appropriate.
The bill allows cities or villages with a city manager to set residency requirements for that position.
Action History
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government
-
Introduced by Senators Spreitzer, Carpenter, Larson and Roys; cosponsored by Representatives Anderson, Brown, Clancy, Emerson, Palmeri, Sinicki and Udell
Sponsors
- Brown · Cosponsor
- Clancy · Cosponsor
- Emerson · Cosponsor
- Palmeri · Cosponsor
- Sinicki · Cosponsor
- Udell · Cosponsor
- Mark Spreitzer · Primary
- Tim Carpenter · Cosponsor
- Chris Larson · Cosponsor
- Kelda Roys · Cosponsor
- J ANDERSON · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Spreitzer, Mark Democrat
Co-sponsors (10)
- Brown
- Clancy
- Emerson
- Palmeri
- Sinicki
- Udell
- Carpenter, Tim Democrat
- Larson, Chris Democrat
- Roys, Kelda Democrat
- ANDERSON, J
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1181 do?
- An Act to repeal 64.09 (3); to create 66.0502 (4) (e) and 66.0502 (4) (f) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 1181?
- SB 1181 is sponsored by Brown, Clancy, Emerson, Palmeri, Sinicki, Udell, Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), Larson, Chris (Democrat), Roys, Kelda (Democrat), and ANDERSON, J.
- What is the current status of SB 1181?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced March 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 1181?
- Track SB 1181 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1181
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1181
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →