Relating to: limitations on extraterritorial subdivision ordinances of incorporated municipalities.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 873 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 873.
You're tracking SB 873
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 873 — Relating to: limitations on extraterritorial subdivision ordinances of incorporated municipalities.
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to renumber and amend 236.45 (3) (b); to create 236.45 (3) (b) 1. to 4. and 236.45 (7) of the statutes;
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
This bill restricts incorporated municipalities from denying subdivision approvals in extraterritorial areas based on certain criteria and allows towns to recover attorney fees in enforcement actions.
-
236.45 (3) (b)
on the basis of the proposed use of land within the extraterritorial plat approval jurisdiction of the municipality, unless the denial is based on a plan or regulations, or amendments thereto, adopted by the governing body of the municipality under s. 62.23 (7a) (c).→ on the basis of any of the following: 1. The proposed use of the land. 2. Specifications related to public improvements on the land. 3. Land division design standards. 4. An agreement or lack of agreement related to the annexation of the land.The bill specifies that municipalities cannot deny approval of subdivisions based on the proposed use of land, public improvement specifications, design standards, or annexation agreements.
-
236.45 (7)
In any action brought by a town to enforce sub. (3) (b), the town is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees if the town is the prevailing party.
Towns can recover attorney fees if they win an enforcement action regarding subdivision approval denials.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government
-
Introduced by Senators Testin, Jacque, Marklein and Stafsholt; cosponsored by Representatives Hurd, Armstrong, Dittrich, Kitchens, Kreibich, Melotik, Moses, Mursau, O'Connor, Summerfield and Swearingen
Sponsors
- Hurd · Cosponsor
- Armstrong · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Kitchens · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Melotik · Cosponsor
- Moses · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Summerfield · Cosponsor
- Swearingen · Cosponsor
- Patrick Testin · Primary
- André Jacque · Cosponsor
- Howard Marklein · Cosponsor
- Rob Stafsholt · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 14 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Testin, Patrick Republican
Co-sponsors (14)
- Hurd
- Armstrong
- Dittrich
- Kitchens
- Kreibich
- Melotik
- Moses
- Mursau
- O'Connor
- Summerfield
- Swearingen
- Jacque, André Republican
- Marklein, Howard Republican
- Stafsholt, Rob Republican
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 873 do?
- An Act to renumber and amend 236.45 (3) (b); to create 236.45 (3) (b) 1. to 4. and 236.45 (7) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 873?
- SB 873 is sponsored by Hurd, Armstrong, Dittrich, Kitchens, Kreibich, Melotik, Moses, Mursau, O'Connor, Summerfield, Swearingen, Testin, Patrick (Republican), Jacque, André (Republican), Marklein, Howard (Republican), and Stafsholt, Rob (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 873?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 873?
- Track SB 873 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 873
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 873
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →