Relating to: notifying counties and tribes of an exceedance of groundwater protection standards or standard...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 628 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 628.
You're tracking SB 628
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 628 — Relating to: notifying counties and tribes of an exceedance of groundwater protection standards or standards for PFAS. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
49 sponsors
1 primary, 48 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
An Act to create 283.90 of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
59 added · 19 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to SB 628 changed the wording from "finds" to "verifies" regarding how the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) determines groundwater standard exceedances, which adds clarity about the verification process. Additionally, it specified that notification is only required once per exceedance rather than multiple times, which streamlines communication. The amendment also clarified which specific standards are applicable and made it mandatory for DNR to notify health departments rather than leaving it to their discretion. These updates enhance the effectiveness of monitoring groundwater quality and ensure that communities are promptly informed of potential health risks.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa1124/1LRB-5324/1 ZDW:cdcZDW:cdc&cjs SENATE AMENDMENTBILL 1,628 TONovember SENATE14, BILL2025 628- FebruaryIntroduced 17,by 2026SenatorsAMES, -JACQUE Offeredand W ANGGAARD , cosponsored by SenaAMESJ.RepresentativesILLING, NOVAK, ANDERSON , RNEY, BARE, BEHNKE , CLANCY, CRUZ, DESANTO , ES MIDT, DONOVAN, DOYLE, EMERSON , FITZGERALD, G OODWIN, G UNDRUM , HAYWOOD , HYSELL, JOERS, K AUFERT, K IRSCH, KITCHENS, K REIBIC, M ADISON, M AYADEV, M ELOTIK, MIRESSE, M OORE OMOKUNDE , MURSAU , NEYLON , ORTIZ-ELEZ, P ALMERI, RIVERA- W AGNER, ROE, SHEEHAN , SINICK, SNODGRASS , NYDER , TROUD , STUBBS, SUBECK , TENORIO, TUCKER , UDELL, V INING and JOHNSON .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendNatural theResources, billVeteran asand follows:Military Affairs.
1.A N A CT to create 283.90 of the statutes;
Pagerelating 2,to: line 3:
substitutenotifying “verifies”counties and tribes of an exceedance of groundwater protection standards or standards for “finds”.PFAS.
2.Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under this bill, if the Department of Natural Resources finds that there has been an exceedance of groundwater standards or of any standard for perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance (commonly known as PFAS) in a proposed or promulgated DNR rule, DNR must notify the county health department, tribal health department, and county land and conservation department in the affected county.
PageDNR 2,must linealso 4:notify the county health department, tribal health department, and county land and conservation department in any adjacent county that DNR determines may be negatively affected by the exceedancThe bill requires DNR to provide these notices within seven business days after verifying that an exceedance has occurred.The bill also requires DNR to create and maintain a notification system for notifying county health departments, tribal health departments, and county land and conservation departments of the types of exceedances that trigger the notice requirement.
deleteFor linesfurther 4information andsee 5the andstate substitutefiscal “anyestimate, groundwaterwhich enforcementwill standardsbe underprinted ch.as an appendix to this bill.
160- or2026 ofLegislature a- department2 of- naturalLRB-5324/1 resourcesZDW:cdc&cjs drinkingSENATE waterBILL standard628 forSECTION PFAS,1 asThe definedpeople of the state of Wisconsin, represented in s.senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
299.48S (1)ECTION (b),”.1.
3.283.90 of the statutes is created to read:
Page283.90 2,Notification lineof 12:exceedances.
after(1) Whenever on the basis of any information available to it the department finds that linethere insert:has been a exceedance of any groundwater protection standards under ch.
“(2)160 Theor departmentof isany notstandard requiredfor toPFAS, provideas noticedefined underin sub.s.
299.48 (1) more(b), thanin oncea forproposed or promulgated rule of the department, the department shall notify the county health department, tribal health department, and county land and conservation department in the affected county and the county health department, tribal health department, and county land and conservation department in any adjacent county that the department determines may be negatively affected as a singleresult exceedance.”.of the exceedance.
4.The department shall provide notice within 7 business days after verifying that an exceedance has occurred.
PageThe 2,notice lineis 13:subject to public inspection and copying under s.
substitute19.35 “(3)”(1). for “(2)”.
5.(2) The department shall create and maintain a notification system for notifying county health departments, tribal health departments, and county land and conservation departments of the exceedances described in this section.
Page(3) 2,The linedepartment 16:may establish procedures for providing notice under this section.
substituteS “(4)”ECTION for2. “(3)”.
-Effective 2026date. Legislature - 2 - LRBa1124/1 ZDW:cdc 6.
Page(1) 2,This lineact 16:takes effect on the first day of the 7th month beginning after publication.
substitute(END) “shall” for “may”.
(END )
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 1 Current pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Natural Resources, Veteran and Military Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Natural Resources, Veteran and Military Affairs, Ayes 4, Noes 1
-
Executive action taken
-
Representative Hong added as a cosponsor
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator James
-
Representative McCarville added as a cosponsor
-
Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor
-
Representative McGuire added as a cosponsor
-
LRB correction
-
Representatives B. Jacobson and Franklin added as cosponsors
-
Representative Phelps added as a cosponsor
-
Representative Andraca added as a cosponsor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Public hearing held
-
Representative Brown added as a cosponsor
-
Senator Dassler-Alfheim added as a coauthor
-
Senator Larson added as a coauthor
-
Senators Pfaff, Wall, Ratcliff, Spreitzer, Smith and Hesselbein added as coauthors
-
Senators Keyeski and Habush Sinykin added as coauthors
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Natural Resources, Veteran and Military Affairs
-
Introduced by Senators James, Jacque and Wanggaard; cosponsored by Representatives Billings, Novak, Anderson, Arney, Bare, Behnke, Clancy, Cruz, DeSanto, DeSmidt, Donovan, Doyle, Emerson, Fitzgerald, Goodwin, Gundrum, Haywood, Hysell, Joers, Kaufert, Kirsch, Kitchens, Kreibich, Madison, Mayadev, Melotik, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Mursau, Neylon, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Sheehan, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Snyder, Stroud, Stubbs, Subeck, Tenorio, Tucker, Udell, Vining and Johnson
Sponsors
- Billings · Cosponsor
- Novak · Cosponsor
- Jesse James · Primary
- Arney · Cosponsor
- Bare · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Clancy · Cosponsor
- Cruz · Cosponsor
- DeSanto · Cosponsor
- DeSmidt · Cosponsor
- Donovan · Cosponsor
- Doyle · Cosponsor
- Emerson · Cosponsor
- Fitzgerald · Cosponsor
- Goodwin · Cosponsor
- Gundrum · Cosponsor
- Haywood · Cosponsor
- Hysell · Cosponsor
- Joers · Cosponsor
- Kaufert · Cosponsor
- Kirsch · Cosponsor
- Kitchens · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Madison · Cosponsor
- Mayadev · Cosponsor
- Melotik · Cosponsor
- Miresse · Cosponsor
- Moore Omokunde · Cosponsor
- Mursau · Cosponsor
- Neylon · Cosponsor
- Ortiz-Velez · Cosponsor
- Palmeri · Cosponsor
- Rivera-Wagner · Cosponsor
- Roe · Cosponsor
- Sheehan · Cosponsor
- Sinicki · Cosponsor
- Snodgrass · Cosponsor
- Snyder · Cosponsor
- Stroud · Cosponsor
- Stubbs · Cosponsor
- Subeck · Cosponsor
- Tenorio · Cosponsor
- Tucker · Cosponsor
- Udell · Cosponsor
- Vining · Cosponsor
- André Jacque · Cosponsor
- Van Wanggaard · Cosponsor
- J ANDERSON · Cosponsor
- LaTonya Johnson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 48 co-sponsors · 83 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- James, Jesse Republican
Co-sponsors (48)
- Billings
- Novak
- Arney
- Bare
- Behnke
- Clancy
- Cruz
- DeSanto
- DeSmidt
- Donovan
- Doyle
- Emerson
- Fitzgerald
- Goodwin
- Gundrum
- Haywood
- Hysell
- Joers
- Kaufert
- Kirsch
- Kitchens
- Kreibich
- Madison
- Mayadev
- Melotik
- Miresse
- Moore Omokunde
- Mursau
- Neylon
- Ortiz-Velez
- Palmeri
- Rivera-Wagner
- Roe
- Sheehan
- Sinicki
- Snodgrass
- Snyder
- Stroud
- Stubbs
- Subeck
- Tenorio
- Tucker
- Udell
- Vining
- Jacque, André Republican
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- ANDERSON, J
- Johnson, LaTonya Democrat
Not signed on (83)
83 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 83 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 628 do?
- An Act to create 283.90 of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 628?
- SB 628 is sponsored by Billings, Novak, James, Jesse (Republican), Arney, Bare, Behnke, Clancy, Cruz, DeSanto, DeSmidt, Donovan, Doyle, Emerson, Fitzgerald, Goodwin, Gundrum, Haywood, Hysell, Joers, Kaufert, Kirsch, Kitchens, Kreibich, Madison, Mayadev, Melotik, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Mursau, Neylon, Ortiz-Velez, Palmeri, Rivera-Wagner, Roe, Sheehan, Sinicki, Snodgrass, Snyder, Stroud, Stubbs, Subeck, Tenorio, Tucker, Udell, Vining, Jacque, André (Republican), Wanggaard, Van (Republican), ANDERSON, J, and Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 628?
- This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced November 14, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 628?
- Track SB 628 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 628
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 628
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →