Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 9 D cosponsors

SB 464 — Relating to: state preemption of local employment regulations. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced October 02, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to repeal 103.007 and 109.09 (3) of the statutes;

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

2 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill repeals state preemption on local regulations concerning employee hours, overtime, and wage claims.

  • 103.007

    103.007  Local regulation of hours of labor and overtime; statewide concern; uniformity. 103.007(1)(1) The legislature finds that employee hour and overtime requirements that are uniform throughout the state is a matter of statewide concern and that the enactment of an ordinance by a city, village, town, or county regulating employee hours or overtime would be logically inconsistent with, would defeat the purpose of, and would go against the spirit of the employee hour and overtime requirements. Therefore, the employee hour and overtime requirements shall be construed as an enactment of statewide concern for the purpose of providing employee hour and overtime requirements that are uniform throughout the state. 103.007(2)(2) In this section, “employee hour and overtime requirements” means the requirements set forth in ss. 103.01 to 103.03, 103.24, 103.38, 103.65 (2), 103.66 (2), 103.67 (1), 103.68, 103.85, 103.915 (4) (b), 103.93 (4), 103.935, and 104.045 (3) and in the rules promulgated under those sections. 103.007(3)(3)  103.007(3)(a)(a) Subject to par. (c), no city, village, town, or county may enact or enforce an ordinance that regulates employee hours or overtime, including scheduling employee work hours or shifts. 103.007(3)(b)(b) Subject to par. (c), if a city, village, town, or county has in effect on April 18, 2018, an ordinance that regulates employee hours or overtime, including scheduling employee work hours or shifts, the ordinance does not apply and may not be enforced. 103.007(3)(c)(c) Nothing in this section prohibits a city, village, town, or county from enacting or enforcing any of the following ordinances: 103.007(3)(c)1.1. An ordinance that limits the hours that a business may operate. 103.007(3)(c)2.2. An ordinance described in s. 103.34 (14) (b) that regulates hours or overtime of a traveling sales crew worker, as defined in s. 103.34 (1) (f).

    Local governments will have the authority to enact their own regulations regarding employee hours, overtime, and wage claims.

  • 109.09 (3)

    109.09(3)(3) 

    Local governments will be allowed to regulate wage claims and collections without state preemption.

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  3. Representative Sinicki added as a cosponsor

  4. Fiscal estimate received

  5. Read first time and referred to Committee on Government Operations, Labor and Economic Development

  6. Introduced by Senators Smith, Pfaff, Carpenter, Roys, Larson, Wirch, Dassler-Alfheim, Spreitzer and Habush Sinykin; cosponsored by Representatives Haywood, Moore Omokunde, McCarville, Snodgrass, Brown, Roe, Miresse, DeSmidt, Stubbs, Arney, Udell, Clancy, Andraca, Phelps, Joers, Hysell and Johnson

Sponsors

  • Habush Sinykin · Cosponsor
  • Haywood · Cosponsor
  • Moore Omokunde · Cosponsor
  • McCarville · Cosponsor
  • Snodgrass · Cosponsor
  • Brown · Cosponsor
  • Roe · Cosponsor
  • Miresse · Cosponsor
  • DeSmidt · Cosponsor
  • Stubbs · Cosponsor
  • Arney · Cosponsor
  • Udell · Cosponsor
  • Clancy · Cosponsor
  • Andraca · Cosponsor
  • Phelps · Cosponsor
  • Joers · Cosponsor
  • Hysell · Cosponsor
  • Jeff Smith · Primary
  • Brad Pfaff · Cosponsor
  • Tim Carpenter · Cosponsor
  • Kelda Roys · Cosponsor
  • Chris Larson · Cosponsor
  • Robert Wirch · Cosponsor
  • Kristin Dassler-Alfheim · Cosponsor
  • Mark Spreitzer · Cosponsor
  • LaTonya Johnson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 106 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (25)

Not signed on (106)

106 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 106 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 464 do?
An Act to repeal 103.007 and 109.09 (3) of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 464?
SB 464 is sponsored by Habush Sinykin, Haywood, Moore Omokunde, McCarville, Snodgrass, Brown, Roe, Miresse, DeSmidt, Stubbs, Arney, Udell, Clancy, Andraca, Phelps, Joers, Hysell, Smith, Jeff (Democrat), Pfaff, Brad (Democrat), Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), Roys, Kelda (Democrat), Larson, Chris (Democrat), Wirch, Robert (Democrat), Dassler-Alfheim, Kristin (Democrat), Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), and Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 464?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced October 02, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 464?
Track SB 464 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 464

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 464

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →