Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 1 R cosponsors

SB 393 — Relating to: school bus operation by drivers over 70 and drivers with medical conditions.

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced August 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    1 primary, 10 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to amend 343.16 (5) (b) and 343.20 (1) (c); to create 343.12 (3m) and 343.20 (1) (cm) of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

109 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 393 makes it easier for school bus drivers who are over 70 or have medical conditions to regain their ability to operate a school bus. Previously, if their "S" endorsement was canceled due to health issues, they had to go through a formal review process to see if they could be reinstated. Now, they can simply provide documentation from a healthcare provider stating they are fit to drive, streamlining the process. This change is important because it helps ensure that experienced drivers can return to work without unnecessary hurdles, which could help address driver shortages in schools.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0692/1 ZDW:wlj SENATE AMENDMENT 2, TO SENATE BILL 393 December 2, 2025 - Offered by SenatAMES.
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-3535/2 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 393 August 25, 2025 - Introduced by Senator AMES , cosponsored by Representatives SORTWELL , PENTERMAN , DITTRICH, GOEBEN , GOODWIN , KNODL , KREIBICH, M ELOTIK, MURSAU and O'C ONNOR .
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government.
1.
A N A CT to amend 343.16 (5) (b) and 343.20 (1) (c);
Page 2, line 1:
to create 343.12 (3m) and 343.20 (1) (cm) of the statutes;
delete lines 1 to 9.
relating to:
END )
school bus operation by drivers over 70 and drivers with medical conditions.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a person may not operate a school bus unless the Department of Transportation has issued a school bus or “S” endorsement to their operator’s license.
A person must meet several requirements to be issued an “S” endorsement, including meeting certain physical standards, and a person’s “S” endorsement can be canceled for medical reasons.
A person whose “S” endorsement has been canceled can apply to reinstate the endorsement.
The application is considered by a medical review board that makes a final recommendation to DOT.
Under administrative rules promulgated by DOT, a review board may recommend that an exception be granted by DOT if the review board determines the person’s medical condition does not impair their ability to safely operate a school bus.
This bill provides that a person whose “S” endorsement has been cancelled for medical reasons that would require a medical review board exception may reinstate the endorsement by providing DOT documentation prepared by a health care provider stating that the person is able to resume operating a school bus.
When DOT receives the documentation, DOT must reinstate the person’s “S” endorsement, which remains valid unless the medical review board determines the reinstatement is improper.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-3535/2 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 393 S ECTION 1 Under current law, review boards must consist of licensed physicians or optometrists, to be appointed by the secretary of transportation.
The bill provides that physician assistants and advanced practice nurses are also eligible to be appointed to review boards.
Under current law, DOT may, by rule, require any person who is issued an operator’s license that is valid for more than two years to demonstrate continuing qualifications to hold the license at two-year intervals.
The bill authorizes DOT, by rule, to require testing in intervals of not less than two years.
The bill also provides that DOT must require any person who is 70 years of age or older and holds an “S” endorsement to file a medical certification annually and demonstrate their continuing ability to hold a license at four-year intervals.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
343.12 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:
343.12 (3m) (a) A person whose school bus endorsement is cancelled for medical reasons that would require a medical review board exception to allow the person to continue operating a school bus may reinstate their school bus endorsement by providing the department documentation prepared by a health care provider stating that the person is able to resume operating a school bus.
(b) Upon receipt of documentation under par.
(a), the department shall reinstate the person’s school bus endorsement, which shall remain valid unless the reviewing board under s.
343.16 (5) (b) determines the reinstatement is improper.
S ECTION 2.
343.16 (5) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
343.16 (5) (b) Whenever the department receives the results of a special examination required under this subsection, the department shall give fair consideration to the recommendation of the examining person or agency together with other evidence in determining if it is in the interest of public safety to issue, renew, deny or cancel a license.
If a license is denied or canceled by the department after a special examination as provided in par.
(a), such denial or cancellation shall - 2026 Legislature - 3 - LRB-3535/2 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 393 SECTION 2 be reviewed by a reviewing board upon written request of the applicant filed with the department within 10 days after receipt of notice of such denial or cancellation.
Notice of denial or cancellation shall be in writing and contain specific reasons.
The notice shall contain a statement that the applicant has 10 days within which to file a written request with the department for review of the department’s decision by the reviewing board.
The applicant shall have the right to appear personally before the review board, to present witnesses and additional information, and to be represented by counsel.
The department’s representative may administer oaths, issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of relevant documents and may require a reexamination of the applicant.
No law enforcement officer or other witness produced by the applicant to testify on the applicant’s behalf shall be paid a witness fee nor shall any law enforcement officer called to appear for the department be paid any witness fee.
A record including the recommendations of the board shall be made of the proceeding.
If a license is denied or canceled, the applicant shall be given specific reasons in writing.
Review boards shall consist of the department’s representative and at least 2 members appointed by the secretary from a list of physicians licensed to practice medicine in this state and a list of optometrists licensed to practice optometry physicians, physician assistants, advanced practice nurses, and optometrists licensed to practice in this state.
Optometrists shall be limited to reviewing cases concerning vision only.
In cases concerning mental disability or disease at least one of the physicians shall have specialized training in psychiatry.In cases concerning seizure disorders at least one of the physicians shall have specialized training in neurology.
Show all 57 changed rows (17 more)
Previous
Latest
The members of the board shall receive the per diem and expenses - 2026 Legislature - 4 - LRB-3535/2 ZDW:klm SENATE BILL 393 SECTION 2 provided in s.
15.08 (7) which shall be charged to the appropriation under s.
20.395 (5) (cq).
A decision of the department based on the recommendation of a reviewing board is subject to judicial review under s.
343.40.
S ECTION 3.
343.20 (1) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:
343.20 (1) (c) The department may, by rule, require any person who is issued an operator’s license that is valid for a period of more than 2 years to demonstrate continuing qualifications to hold a license under this chapter at 2-year intervals of not less than 2 years.
The rules may include, without limitation, requiring examination under s.
343.16 (6) (a) or requiring current medical certification under s.
343.16 (5).
The department rules shall require cancellation or suspension of the license for noncompliance and shall permit surrender of the operator’s license under s.
343.265.
S ECTION 4.
343.20 (1) (cm) of the statutes is created to read:
343.20 (1) (cm) The department shall require any person who is 70 years of age or older and holds a school bus endorsement to file a medical certification annually and demonstrate their continuing ability to hold a license under this chapter at 4-year intervals, as measured from the date of their preceding examination.
(END)
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Available for scheduling

  3. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  4. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 3 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  5. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Transportation and Local Government, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  6. Executive action taken

  7. Senate Amendment 3 offered by Senator James

  8. Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator James

  9. Public hearing held

  10. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator James

  11. Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  12. Introduced by Senator James; cosponsored by Representatives Sortwell, Penterman, Dittrich, Goeben, Goodwin, Knodl, Kreibich, Melotik, Mursau and O'Connor

Sponsors

  • Sortwell · Cosponsor
  • Penterman · Cosponsor
  • Dittrich · Cosponsor
  • Goeben · Cosponsor
  • Goodwin · Cosponsor
  • Knodl · Cosponsor
  • Kreibich · Cosponsor
  • Melotik · Cosponsor
  • Mursau · Cosponsor
  • O'Connor · Cosponsor
  • Jesse James · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (10)

  • Sortwell
  • Penterman
  • Dittrich
  • Goeben
  • Goodwin
  • Knodl
  • Kreibich
  • Melotik
  • Mursau
  • O'Connor

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 393 do?
An Act to amend 343.16 (5) (b) and 343.20 (1) (c); to create 343.12 (3m) and 343.20 (1) (cm) of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 393?
SB 393 is sponsored by Sortwell, Penterman, Dittrich, Goeben, Goodwin, Knodl, Kreibich, Melotik, Mursau, O'Connor, and James, Jesse (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 393?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced August 25, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 393?
Track SB 393 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 393

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 393

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →