Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 5 R cosponsors

SB 381 — Relating to: suspension without pay in cases of judicial misconduct or pending final determination in proceedings involving alleged judicial misconduct or permanent disability.

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced July 28, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • Introduced

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 20 sponsors

    1 primary, 19 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (5 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

50 added · 15 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 381 adds language specifying that judges can be suspended without pay in cases involving criminal misconduct. It also states that if a judge is ultimately found not guilty of any wrongdoing, they will receive back pay from the time of their suspension until the final decision. This change is important because it clarifies the circumstances under which pay can be withheld, helping to protect judges' rights while maintaining accountability in cases of alleged misconduct.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRBa0450/1 JK:cdc SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 381 October 2, 2025 - Offered by SenaOMCZYK .
- 2026 LEGISLATURE LRB-4090/1 KRP:cdc SENATE BILL 381 July 28, 2025 - Introduced by SenaOMCZYK , ABRAL -GUEVARA, BRADLEY, ASS and Q UINN, cosponsored by Representatives S ORTWELL , A UGUST, B.
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
JACOBSON , G REEN, P ENTERMAN , KNODL , D ONOVAN , DITTRICH, M AXEY, O'CONNOR , GOEBEN , BEHNKE, ALLEN , REIBICH and M URPHY .
1.
Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
Page 2, line 5:
A N A CT to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;
after XforY insert XcriminalY.
relating to:
2.
suspension without pay in cases of judicial misconduct or pending final determination in proceedings involving alleged judicial misconduct or permanent disability.
Page 2, line 15:
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau The Wisconsin Constitution authorizes the supreme court to reprimand, censure, suspend, or remove for cause or for disability any judge or justice pursuant to procedures established by the legislature by law.
after XsectionY insert Xon the basis of a complaint establishing probable cause of criminal misconductY.
Under current law, the supreme court’s disciplinary authority also extends to court commissioners.
3.
The Judicial Commission currently is charged with investigating alleged misconduct or permanent disability of a judge, justice, or court commissioner (judge).
Page 2, line 15:
Under current law, if the Judicial Commission finds probable cause that a judge has engaged or is engaging in misconduct, it files a formal complaint with the supreme court, and, if the Judicial Commission finds probable cause that a judge has a permanent disability, it files a petition with the supreme court.
after XpayY insert X, except that if, upon the final determination of the proceedings, the supreme court imposes no discipline on the judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner, the judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner is entitled to back pay accrued from the first day of the suspension to the date of the final determinationY.
Under current law, after a formal complaint or petition is filed, the supreme court may temporarily suspend a judge pending final determination of the proceedings.
The supreme court ultimately determines the appropriate discipline or action in each proceeding.
This bill specifies that, if the supreme court imposes a temporary suspension pending final determination of proceedings or imposes a suspension as a disciplinary sanction in a case of misconduct, the suspension must be without pay.
- 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-4090/1 KRP:cdc SENATE BILL 381 SECTION 1 The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
757.91 of the statutes is amended to read:
757.91 Supreme court;
disposition.
The supreme court shall review the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations under s.
757.89 and determine appropriate discipline in cases of misconduct and appropriate action in cases of permanent disabilityIf the supreme court imposes a suspension for misconduct, the suspension shall be without pay.
The rules of the supreme court applicable to civil cases in the supreme court govern the review proceedings under this section.
S ECTION 2.
757.95 of the statutes is amended to read:
757.95 Temporary suspension by supreme court.
The supreme court may, following the filing of a formal complaint or a petition by the commission, prohibit a judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner from exercising the powers of a judge or circuit or supplemental court commissioner pending final determination of the proceedingsIf the supreme court imposes a temporary suspension under this section, the suspension shall be without pay.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Available for scheduling

  3. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  4. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  5. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 3

  6. Executive action taken

  7. Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator Tomczyk

  8. Public hearing held

  9. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Tomczyk

  10. Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  11. Introduced by Senators Tomczyk, Cabral-Guevara, Bradley, Nass and Quinn; cosponsored by Representatives Sortwell, August, B. Jacobson, Green, Penterman, Knodl, Donovan, Dittrich, Maxey, O'Connor, Goeben, Behnke, Allen, Kreibich and Murphy

Sponsors

  • Sortwell · Cosponsor
  • August · Cosponsor
  • B. Jacobson · Cosponsor
  • Green · Cosponsor
  • Penterman · Cosponsor
  • Knodl · Cosponsor
  • Donovan · Cosponsor
  • Dittrich · Cosponsor
  • Maxey · Cosponsor
  • O'Connor · Cosponsor
  • Goeben · Cosponsor
  • Behnke · Cosponsor
  • Allen · Cosponsor
  • Kreibich · Cosponsor
  • Murphy · Cosponsor
  • Cory Tomczyk · Primary
  • Rachael Cabral-Guevara · Cosponsor
  • Julian Bradley · Cosponsor
  • Steve Nass · Cosponsor
  • Romaine Quinn · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 19 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (19)

Not signed on (112)

112 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 112 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 381 do?
An Act to amend 757.91 and 757.95 of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 381?
SB 381 is sponsored by Sortwell, August, B. Jacobson, Green, Penterman, Knodl, Donovan, Dittrich, Maxey, O'Connor, Goeben, Behnke, Allen, Kreibich, Murphy, Tomczyk, Cory (Republican), Cabral-Guevara, Rachael (Republican), Bradley, Julian (Republican), Nass, Steve (Republican), and Quinn, Romaine (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 381?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced July 28, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 381?
Track SB 381 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 381

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 381

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →