Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 9 D cosponsors

SB 343 — Relating to: requiring bicycle and pedestrian facilities in highway projects and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to repeal 84.01 (35) (d) (intro.) and 2.; to renumber 84.01 (35) (d) 1.; to amend 84.01 (35) (b); to create 84.01 (35) (c) of the statutes;

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

4 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill requires the establishment of bikeways and pedestrian ways in all new highway projects funded by state or federal funds, with specific exceptions.

  • 84.01 (35) (b)

    The department shall give due consideration to establishing → the department shall ensure that bikeways and pedestrian ways are established in all new highway construction and reconstruction projects funded in whole or in part from state funds or federal funds appropriated under s. 20.395 or 20.866.

    This change makes it mandatory for the Department of Transportation to establish bikeways and pedestrian ways in new highway projects.

  • 84.01 (35) (c)

    The department shall promulgate rules identifying exceptions to the requirement under par. (b), but these rules may provide for an exception only if any of the following applies: 2. The cost of establishing bikeways or pedestrian ways would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use of the bikeways or pedestrian ways.

    This establishes a process for the Department to create rules that allow exceptions to the requirement for bikeways and pedestrian ways under certain conditions.

  • 84.01 (35) (d)

    84.01 (35) (d) (intro.) and 2.

    This repeal removes previous provisions that limited the establishment of bikeways and pedestrian ways based on local government authorization.

  • 84.01 (35) (d) 1.

    renumbered 84.01 (35) (c) 1.

    This change renumbers an existing provision to accommodate the restructuring of related subsections.

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Representative J. Jacobson added as a cosponsor

  3. Fiscal estimate received

  4. Read first time and referred to Committee on Transportation and Local Government

  5. Introduced by Senators Larson, Carpenter, Roys, Hesselbein, Smith, Spreitzer, L. Johnson, Ratcliff and Dassler-Alfheim; cosponsored by Representatives Snodgrass, Vining, Andraca, Palmeri, Joers, Mayadev, Anderson, Bare, Brown, Clancy, DeSmidt, Madison, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Neubauer, Phelps, Roe, Sinicki and Subeck

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 27 co-sponsors · 104 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (27)

Not signed on (104)

104 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 104 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 343 do?
An Act to repeal 84.01 (35) (d) (intro.) and 2.; to renumber 84.01 (35) (d) 1.; to amend 84.01 (35) (b); to create 84.01 (35) (c) of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 343?
SB 343 is sponsored by Snodgrass, Vining, Andraca, Palmeri, Joers, Mayadev, Bare, Brown, Clancy, DeSmidt, Madison, Miresse, Moore Omokunde, Neubauer, Phelps, Roe, Sinicki, Subeck, Larson, Chris (Democrat), Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), Roys, Kelda (Democrat), Hesselbein, Dianne (Democrat), Smith, Jeff (Democrat), Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat), Ratcliff, Melissa (Democrat), Dassler-Alfheim, Kristin (Democrat), and ANDERSON, J.
What is the current status of SB 343?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 27, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 343?
Track SB 343 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 343

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 343

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →