Wisconsin 2025 Regular Session Status: Introduced 12 D cosponsors

SB 329 — Relating to: extreme risk protection temporary restraining orders and injunctions, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 19, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.

Prognosis

Not enough signal yet

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

An Act to amend 165.63 (3), 165.63 (4) (d), 175.35 (1) (at), 175.60 (9g) (a) 2., 175.60 (11) (a) 2. f., 801.58 (2m), 813.06, 813.126 (1), 813.127, 813.128 (2g) (b) and 941.29 (1m) (f); to create 16.316, 20.505 (1) (ft), 801.50 (5sb) and 813.124 of the statutes;

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill introduces procedures for extreme risk protection temporary restraining orders and injunctions to prevent individuals deemed likely to harm themselves or others from possessing firearms.

  • 165.63 (3)

    In making a determination required under s. 813.1285 (7) (a) or 968.20 (1m) (d) 1., → In making a determination required under s. 813.124 (7) (a), 813.1285 (7) (a), or 968.20 (1m) (d) 1.,

    Expands the situations in which judges must request information from the Department of Justice to include extreme risk protection injunctions.

  • 165.63 (4) (d)

    Aid the court in making a determination required under s. 813.1285 (7) (a) or 968.20 (1m) (d) 1. or aid an entity in making a determination required under s. 968.20 (1m) (d) 2. → Aid the court in making a determination required under s. 813.124 (7) (a), 813.1285 (7) (a), or 968.20 (1m) (d) 1. or aid an entity in making a determination required under s. 968.20 (1m) (d) 2.

    Ensures that law enforcement assists courts in determining extreme risk protection injunctions.

  • 175.35 (1) (at)

    a search to determine whether a person is prohibited from possessing a firearm under s. 813.12 or 813.122, → a search to determine whether the person is subject to a temporary restraining order or injunction under s. 813.124, and

    Includes checks for temporary restraining orders related to extreme risk protection in firearm purchase background checks.

  • 175.60 (9g) (a) 2.

    whether the applicant is subject to an injunction under s. 813.12 or 813.122, → whether the applicant is subject to a temporary restraining order or injunction under s. 813.124; and

    Expands background checks for concealed weapon applicants to include pending temporary restraining orders related to extreme risk.

  • 175.60 (11) (a) 2. f.

    The individual becomes subject to an → The individual becomes subject to an a temporary restraining order or injunction described in s. 941.29 (1m) (f) or

    Clarifies the conditions under which an individual's firearm possession is prohibited due to temporary restraining orders.

  • 801.58 (2m)

    any ex parte order granted by the original judge remains in effect according to the terms, except that a temporary restraining order issued under s. 813.12 (3), 813.122 (4), 813.123 (4), or 813. → any ex parte order granted by the original judge remains in effect according to the terms, except that a temporary restraining order issued under s. 813.124, or 813.

    Updates the provision regarding the validity of ex parte orders to include those related to the new extreme risk protection orders.

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Representative Billings added as a cosponsor

  3. Representative Rivera-Wagner added as a cosponsor

  4. Representative McCarville added as a cosponsor

  5. Fiscal estimate received

  6. Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs

  7. Introduced by Senators L. Johnson, Larson, Hesselbein, Roys, Drake, Keyeski, Smith, Ratcliff, Habush Sinykin, Carpenter, Dassler-Alfheim and Spreitzer; cosponsored by Representatives Andraca, Stubbs, Fitzgerald, Joers, Subeck, Vining, Kirsch, Bare, Brown, Sinicki, Roe, Hysell, Neubauer, Taylor, Snodgrass, Mayadev, Sheehan, Miresse, Udell, Arney, Emerson, Prado, Tenorio, Moore Omokunde, Palmeri, DeSmidt, Stroud, Anderson, Cruz, Goodwin, Johnson and Haywood

Sponsors

  • Habush Sinykin · Cosponsor
  • Andraca · Cosponsor
  • Stubbs · Cosponsor
  • Fitzgerald · Cosponsor
  • Joers · Cosponsor
  • Subeck · Cosponsor
  • Vining · Cosponsor
  • Kirsch · Cosponsor
  • Bare · Cosponsor
  • Brown · Cosponsor
  • Sinicki · Cosponsor
  • Roe · Cosponsor
  • Hysell · Cosponsor
  • Neubauer · Cosponsor
  • Taylor · Cosponsor
  • Snodgrass · Cosponsor
  • Mayadev · Cosponsor
  • Sheehan · Cosponsor
  • Miresse · Cosponsor
  • Udell · Cosponsor
  • Arney · Cosponsor
  • Emerson · Cosponsor
  • Prado · Cosponsor
  • Tenorio · Cosponsor
  • Moore Omokunde · Cosponsor
  • Palmeri · Cosponsor
  • DeSmidt · Cosponsor
  • Stroud · Cosponsor
  • LaTonya Johnson · Primary
  • Chris Larson · Cosponsor
  • Dianne Hesselbein · Cosponsor
  • Kelda Roys · Cosponsor
  • Dora Drake · Cosponsor
  • Cruz · Cosponsor
  • Goodwin · Cosponsor
  • Haywood · Cosponsor
  • Sarah Keyeski · Cosponsor
  • Jeff Smith · Cosponsor
  • Melissa Ratcliff · Cosponsor
  • Tim Carpenter · Cosponsor
  • Kristin Dassler-Alfheim · Cosponsor
  • Mark Spreitzer · Cosponsor
  • J ANDERSON · Cosponsor
  • LaTonya Johnson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 43 co-sponsors · 88 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (43)

Not signed on (88)

88 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 88 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety elections labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 329 do?
An Act to amend 165.63 (3), 165.63 (4) (d), 175.35 (1) (at), 175.60 (9g) (a) 2., 175.60 (11) (a) 2. f., 801.58 (2m), 813.06, 813.126 (1), 813.127, 813.128 (2g) (b) and 941.29 (1m) (f); to create 16.316, 20.505 (1) (ft), 801.50 (5sb) and 813.124 of the statutes;
Who sponsors SB 329?
SB 329 is sponsored by Habush Sinykin, Andraca, Stubbs, Fitzgerald, Joers, Subeck, Vining, Kirsch, Bare, Brown, Sinicki, Roe, Hysell, Neubauer, Taylor, Snodgrass, Mayadev, Sheehan, Miresse, Udell, Arney, Emerson, Prado, Tenorio, Moore Omokunde, Palmeri, DeSmidt, Stroud, Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat), Larson, Chris (Democrat), Hesselbein, Dianne (Democrat), Roys, Kelda (Democrat), Drake, Dora (Democrat), Cruz, Goodwin, Haywood, Keyeski, Sarah (Democrat), Smith, Jeff (Democrat), Ratcliff, Melissa (Democrat), Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), Dassler-Alfheim, Kristin (Democrat), Spreitzer, Mark (Democrat), and ANDERSON, J.
What is the current status of SB 329?
This bill has been introduced in the Senate. Introduced June 19, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 329?
Track SB 329 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 329

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 329

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →