SB 270 — Relating to: the right of appeal for complainants aggrieved by decisions of the Elections Commission concerning the conduct of election officials.
Last action — Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced May 20, 2025. It awaits signature.
Vetoed by Governor Tony Evers (Democratic) on December 05, 2025.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
18 sponsors
1 primary, 17 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
An Act to amend 5.06 (8) of the statutes;
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
17 added · 51 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SB 270 clarifies the process for individuals who wish to appeal decisions made by the Elections Commission regarding election officials. Specifically, it now allows anyone who feels harmed by these decisions to appeal, even if they cannot prove a specific legal injury. This change matters because it broadens the ability of complainants to challenge decisions, potentially leading to better accountability in the election process and ensuring that concerns are heard more openly.
-Date 2026of LEGISLATUREenactment: LRB-2416/1 MPG:cjs SENATE BILL 270 May 20, 2025 - Introduced by Senators W ANGGAARD and N ASS, cosponsored by Representatives W ITTKE, NEYLON , LLEN , O'CONNOR , ENTERMAN , M URPHY, ARMSTRONG , DITTRICH , MOSES , PIWOWARCZYK , BRILL, W ICHGERS, K NODL, BEHNKE , KREIBICH and G OEBEN .
ReferredSenate toBill Committee270 onDate Licensing,of Regulatorypublication*: Reform, State and Federal Affairs.
WISCONSIN ACT A N A CT to amend 5.06 (8) of the statutes;
Analysisplainant byresides theno Legislativelater Referencethan Bureau30 Underdays currentafter law,issuance anyof personThe eligiblepeople toof vote in Wisconsin may file a complaint with the Electionsstate Commissionof allegingWisconsin, thatrepresented anin electionsen- officialate servingand theassembly, voter’sdo jurisdictionenact hasas failedfollows: to comply with certain election laws or has abused his or her discretion with respect to the administration of such election laws.
After investigation of a complaint, current law authorizes the commissionorder. to issue an order requiring an election official to conform his or her conduct to the law, restraining an election official from taking any action inconsistent with the law, or requiring an election official to correct any action or decision inconsistent with the law.
Additionally,Pendency currentof law authorizes any complainant who is aggrieved by an orderappeal ofdoes thenot commissionstay on the complainteffect toSECTION appeal1. the commission’s decision in court.
The5.06 law(8) doesof notthe specificallystatutes defineis theamended termto “aggrieved”of foran purposesorder ofunless thisthe rightcourt ofso appeal.orders.
However,A incomplainant Brownshall v.be considered aggrieved under this subsection re- read:
Wisconsingardless Electionsof Commission,whether 2025 WI 5, the Wisconsincomplainant Supremehas Courtsuffered heldan thatin- a5.06 complainant(8) notAny receivingelection aofficial favorableor decisioncomplainant fromwho theis Electionsjury Commissionto on a complaintlegally isrecognized aggrieved,interest and thereforemay has a right to appeal thatany decisionaggrieved inby court, only if the complainant has suffered an injuryorder toissued aunder legallysub. recognized interest as a result of the decision.
-(6) 2026 Legislature - 2 - LRB-2416/1 MPG:cjs SENATE BILL 270 SECTION 1 This bill provides that a complainant must be considered aggrieved for purposes of that right of appeal regardless of whether the complainant has suffered an injury to a legally recognized interest and that a complainant may appeal any commission order thatissued dismissesunder thesub. complaint or otherwise does not grant the relief requested in the complaint.
The(6) peoplethat ofdismisses the statecomplaint the decision of Wisconsin,the representedcommission to circuit court for the or otherwise does not grant the relief requested in senatethe andcounty assembly,where dothe enactofficial asconducts follows:business or the com- complaint.
S* ECTIONSection 1.991.11, ISCONSINSTATUTES :
5.06Effective (8)date of theacts. statutes is amended to read:
5.06“Every (8)act Anyand electionevery officialportion orof complainantan whoact isenacted aggrieved by anthe orderlegislature issuedover underthe sub.gov- ernor's partial veto which does not expressly prescribe the time when it takes effect shall take effect on the day after its date of publication.”
(6) may appeal the decision of the commission to circuit court for the county where the official conducts business or the complainant resides no later than 30 days after issuance of the order.
Pendency of an appeal does not stay the effect of an order unless the court so orders.
A complainant shall be considered aggrieved under this subsection regardless of whether the complainant has suffered an injury to a legally recognized interest and may appeal any order issued under sub.
(6) that dismisses the complaint or otherwise does not grant the relief requested in the complaint.
(END )
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Text as Enrolled pdf
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill expands the definition of 'aggrieved' complainants, allowing appeals regardless of injury to a legally recognized interest.
-
5.06(8)
A complainant shall be considered aggrieved under this subsection regardless of whether the complainant has suffered an injury to a legally recognized interest and may appeal any order issued under sub. (6) that dismisses the complaint or otherwise does not grant the relief requested in the complaint.→ A complainant shall be considered aggrieved under this subsection regardless of whether the complainant has suffered an injury to a legally recognized interest and may appeal any order issued under sub. (6) that dismisses the complaint or otherwise does not grant the relief requested in the complaint.This change clarifies that any complainant may appeal the commission's decision even if they haven't suffered legal injury.
Action History
-
Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82
-
Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)
-
Report vetoed by the Governor on 12-5-2025
-
Presented to the Governor on 12-4-2025
-
Report correctly enrolled
-
Received from Assembly concurred in
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and concurred in, Ayes 54, Noes 43
-
Rules suspended
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Rules suspended to withdraw from calendar and take up
-
Placed on calendar 11-19-2025 by Committee on Rules
-
Read first time and referred to committee on Rules
-
Received from Senate
-
Ordered immediately messaged
-
Read a third time and passed
-
Rules suspended to give bill its third reading
-
Ordered to a third reading
-
Read a second time
-
Placed on calendar 10-14-2025 pursuant to Senate Rule 18(1)
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage recommended by Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs, Ayes 3, Noes 2
-
Executive action taken
-
Public hearing held
-
Senator Kapenga added as a coauthor
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Licensing, Regulatory Reform, State and Federal Affairs
-
Introduced by Senators Wanggaard and Nass; cosponsored by Representatives Wittke, Neylon, Allen, O'Connor, Penterman, Murphy, Armstrong, Dittrich, Moses, Piwowarczyk, Brill, Wichgers, Knodl, Behnke, Kreibich and Goeben
Sponsors
- Wittke · Cosponsor
- Neylon · Cosponsor
- Allen · Cosponsor
- O'Connor · Cosponsor
- Penterman · Cosponsor
- Murphy · Cosponsor
- Armstrong · Cosponsor
- Dittrich · Cosponsor
- Moses · Cosponsor
- Piwowarczyk · Cosponsor
- Brill · Cosponsor
- Wichgers · Cosponsor
- Knodl · Cosponsor
- Behnke · Cosponsor
- Kreibich · Cosponsor
- Goeben · Cosponsor
- Steve Nass · Cosponsor
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 17 co-sponsors · 114 not signed on · 41 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
Co-sponsors (17)
- Wittke
- Neylon
- Allen
- O'Connor
- Penterman
- Murphy
- Armstrong
- Dittrich
- Moses
- Piwowarczyk
- Brill
- Wichgers
- Knodl
- Behnke
- Kreibich
- Goeben
- Nass, Steve Republican
Not signed on (114)
114 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 114 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 41 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 54 | 43 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 43% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (99)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON | — | Nay |
| MOORE OMOKUNDE | — | Nay |
| SPEAKER | — | Yea |
| Anderson, Clinton | Democrat | Nay |
| Andraca, Deb | Democrat | Nay |
| Arney, Margaret | Democrat | Nay |
| Bare, Mike | Democrat | Nay |
| Billings, Jill | Democrat | Nay |
| Brown, Brienne | Democrat | Nay |
| Clancy, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Cruz, Angelina | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSanto, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| DeSmidt, Ben | Democrat | Nay |
| Doyle, Steve | Democrat | Nay |
| Emerson, Jodi | Democrat | Nay |
| Fitzgerald, Joan | Democrat | Nay |
| Goodwin, Russell | Democrat | Nay |
| Haywood, Kalan | Democrat | Nay |
| Hong, Francesca | Democrat | Nay |
| Hysell, Andrew | Democrat | Nay |
| Jacobson, Jenna | Democrat | Nay |
| Joers, Alex | Democrat | Nay |
| Kirsch, Karen | Democrat | Nay |
| Madison, Darrin | Democrat | Nay |
| Mayadev, Renuka | Democrat | Nay |
| McCarville, Maureen | Democrat | Nay |
| McGuire, Tip | Democrat | Nay |
| Miresse, Vincent | Democrat | Nay |
| Neubauer, Greta | Democrat | Nay |
| Ortiz-Velez, Sylvia | Democrat | Nay |
| Palmeri, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Phelps, Christian | Democrat | Nay |
| Prado, Priscilla | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Rivera-Wagner, Amaad | Democrat | Nay |
| Roe, Ann | Democrat | Nay |
| Sheehan, Joe | Democrat | Nay |
| Sinicki, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Snodgrass, Lee | Democrat | Nay |
| Spaude, Ryan | Democrat | Nay |
| Stroud, Angela | Democrat | Nay |
| Stubbs, Shelia | Democrat | Nay |
| Subeck, Lisa | Democrat | Nay |
| Taylor, Sequanna | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tenorio, Angelito | Democrat | Nay |
| Udell, Randy | Democrat | Nay |
| Vining, Robyn | Democrat | Nay |
| Allen, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Armstrong, David | Republican | Yea |
| August, Tyler | Republican | Yea |
| Behnke, Elijah | Republican | Yea |
| Born, Mark | Republican | Yea |
| Brill, Lindee | Republican | Yea |
| Brooks, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Callahan, Calvin | Republican | Yea |
| Dallman, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Dittrich, Barbara | Republican | Yea |
| Donovan, Bob | Republican | Yea |
| Duchow, Cindi | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin, Benjamin | Republican | Yea |
| Goeben, Joy | Republican | Yea |
| Green, Chanz | Republican | Yea |
| Gundrum, Rick | Republican | Yea |
| Gustafson, Nate | Republican | Yea |
| Hurd, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Jacobson, Brent | Republican | Yea |
| Kaufert, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Kitchens, Joel | Republican | Yea |
| Knodl, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Kreibich, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Krug, Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Kurtz, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Maxey, Dave | Republican | Yea |
| Melotik, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Moses, Clint | Republican | Yea |
| Murphy, David | Republican | Yea |
| Mursau, Jeffrey | Republican | Yea |
| Nedweski, Amanda | Republican | Yea |
| Neylon, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Novak, Todd | Republican | Yea |
| O'Connor, Jerry | Republican | Yea |
| Penterman, William | Republican | Yea |
| Petersen, Kevin | Republican | Yea |
| Piwowarczyk, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Pronschinske, Treig | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Jessie | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, Patrick | Republican | Yea |
| Sortwell, Shae | Republican | Yea |
| Spiros, John | Republican | Yea |
| Steffen, David | Republican | Yea |
| Summerfield, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Swearingen, Rob | Republican | Yea |
| Tittl, Paul | Republican | Yea |
| Tranel, Travis | Republican | Yea |
| Tucker, Duke | Republican | Yea |
| Tusler, Ron | Republican | Yea |
| VanderMeer, Nancy | Republican | Yea |
| Wichgers, Chuck | Republican | Yea |
| Wittke, Robert | Republican | Yea |
| Zimmerman, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 270 do?
- An Act to amend 5.06 (8) of the statutes;
- Who sponsors SB 270?
- SB 270 is sponsored by Wittke, Neylon, Allen, O'Connor, Penterman, Murphy, Armstrong, Dittrich, Moses, Piwowarczyk, Brill, Wichgers, Knodl, Behnke, Kreibich, Goeben, Nass, Steve (Republican), and Wanggaard, Van (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 270?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced May 20, 2025. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SB 270?
- Track SB 270 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 270
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 270
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →